Cargando…

What’s New in the Toolbox for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence?

Constipation and fecal incontinence (FI) are common complaints predominantly affecting the elderly and women. They are associated with significant morbidity and high healthcare costs. The causes are often multi-factorial and overlapping. With the advent of new technologies, we have a better understa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lee, Yeong Yeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4335388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25705618
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2014.00005
_version_ 1782358335618547712
author Lee, Yeong Yeh
author_facet Lee, Yeong Yeh
author_sort Lee, Yeong Yeh
collection PubMed
description Constipation and fecal incontinence (FI) are common complaints predominantly affecting the elderly and women. They are associated with significant morbidity and high healthcare costs. The causes are often multi-factorial and overlapping. With the advent of new technologies, we have a better understanding of their underlying pathophysiology which may involve disruption at any levels along the gut–brain–microbiota axis. Initial approach to management should always be the exclusion of secondary causes. Mild symptoms can be approached with conservative measures that may include dietary modifications, exercise, and medications. New prokinetics (e.g., prucalopride) and secretagogues (e.g., lubiprostone and linaclotide) are effective and safe in constipation. Biofeedback is the treatment of choice for dyssynergic defecation. Refractory constipation may respond to neuromodulation therapy with colectomy as the last resort especially for slow-transit constipation of neuropathic origin. Likewise, in refractory FI, less invasive approach can be tried first before progressing to more invasive surgical approach. Injectable bulking agents, sacral nerve stimulation, and SECCA procedure have modest efficacy but safe and less invasive. Surgery has equivocal efficacy but there are promising new techniques including dynamic graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter, and magnetic anal sphincter. Despite being challenging, there are no short of alternatives in our toolbox for the management of constipation and FI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4335388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43353882015-02-20 What’s New in the Toolbox for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence? Lee, Yeong Yeh Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Constipation and fecal incontinence (FI) are common complaints predominantly affecting the elderly and women. They are associated with significant morbidity and high healthcare costs. The causes are often multi-factorial and overlapping. With the advent of new technologies, we have a better understanding of their underlying pathophysiology which may involve disruption at any levels along the gut–brain–microbiota axis. Initial approach to management should always be the exclusion of secondary causes. Mild symptoms can be approached with conservative measures that may include dietary modifications, exercise, and medications. New prokinetics (e.g., prucalopride) and secretagogues (e.g., lubiprostone and linaclotide) are effective and safe in constipation. Biofeedback is the treatment of choice for dyssynergic defecation. Refractory constipation may respond to neuromodulation therapy with colectomy as the last resort especially for slow-transit constipation of neuropathic origin. Likewise, in refractory FI, less invasive approach can be tried first before progressing to more invasive surgical approach. Injectable bulking agents, sacral nerve stimulation, and SECCA procedure have modest efficacy but safe and less invasive. Surgery has equivocal efficacy but there are promising new techniques including dynamic graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter, and magnetic anal sphincter. Despite being challenging, there are no short of alternatives in our toolbox for the management of constipation and FI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4335388/ /pubmed/25705618 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2014.00005 Text en Copyright © 2014 Lee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Lee, Yeong Yeh
What’s New in the Toolbox for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence?
title What’s New in the Toolbox for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence?
title_full What’s New in the Toolbox for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence?
title_fullStr What’s New in the Toolbox for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence?
title_full_unstemmed What’s New in the Toolbox for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence?
title_short What’s New in the Toolbox for Constipation and Fecal Incontinence?
title_sort what’s new in the toolbox for constipation and fecal incontinence?
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4335388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25705618
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2014.00005
work_keys_str_mv AT leeyeongyeh whatsnewinthetoolboxforconstipationandfecalincontinence