Cargando…
The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio
Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) have been measured for various features of sounds, but despite its importance to communication, there is no benchmark for what is a just-noticeable—and possibly meaningful—difference in speech-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNR plays a crucial role in speech communication f...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4335553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25681327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515572316 |
_version_ | 1782358361835044864 |
---|---|
author | McShefferty, David Whitmer, William M. Akeroyd, Michael A. |
author_facet | McShefferty, David Whitmer, William M. Akeroyd, Michael A. |
author_sort | McShefferty, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) have been measured for various features of sounds, but despite its importance to communication, there is no benchmark for what is a just-noticeable—and possibly meaningful—difference in speech-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNR plays a crucial role in speech communication for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Difficulty hearing speech in background noise—a poor SNR—often leads to dissatisfaction with hearing-assistance devices. While such devices attempt through various strategies to address this problem, it is not currently known how much improvement in SNR is needed to provide a noticeable benefit. To investigate what is a noticeable benefit, we measured the JND in SNR for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Here, we report the SNR JNDs of 69 participants of varying hearing ability, estimated using either an adaptive or fixed-level procedure. The task was to judge which of the two intervals containing a sentence in speech-spectrum noise presented over headphones was clearer. The level of each interval was roved to reduce the influence of absolute level cues. The results of both procedures showed an average SNR JND of 3 dB that was independent of hearing ability. Further experiments using a subset of normal-hearing listeners showed that level roving does elevate threshold. These results suggest that noise reduction schemes may need to achieve a benefit greater than 3 dB to be reliably discriminable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4335553 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43355532015-02-23 The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio McShefferty, David Whitmer, William M. Akeroyd, Michael A. Trends Hear Original Articles Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) have been measured for various features of sounds, but despite its importance to communication, there is no benchmark for what is a just-noticeable—and possibly meaningful—difference in speech-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNR plays a crucial role in speech communication for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Difficulty hearing speech in background noise—a poor SNR—often leads to dissatisfaction with hearing-assistance devices. While such devices attempt through various strategies to address this problem, it is not currently known how much improvement in SNR is needed to provide a noticeable benefit. To investigate what is a noticeable benefit, we measured the JND in SNR for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Here, we report the SNR JNDs of 69 participants of varying hearing ability, estimated using either an adaptive or fixed-level procedure. The task was to judge which of the two intervals containing a sentence in speech-spectrum noise presented over headphones was clearer. The level of each interval was roved to reduce the influence of absolute level cues. The results of both procedures showed an average SNR JND of 3 dB that was independent of hearing ability. Further experiments using a subset of normal-hearing listeners showed that level roving does elevate threshold. These results suggest that noise reduction schemes may need to achieve a benefit greater than 3 dB to be reliably discriminable. SAGE Publications 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4335553/ /pubmed/25681327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515572316 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles McShefferty, David Whitmer, William M. Akeroyd, Michael A. The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio |
title | The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio |
title_full | The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio |
title_fullStr | The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio |
title_full_unstemmed | The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio |
title_short | The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio |
title_sort | just-noticeable difference in speech-to-noise ratio |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4335553/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25681327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515572316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcsheffertydavid thejustnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio AT whitmerwilliamm thejustnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio AT akeroydmichaela thejustnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio AT mcsheffertydavid justnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio AT whitmerwilliamm justnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio AT akeroydmichaela justnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio |