Cargando…

The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio

Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) have been measured for various features of sounds, but despite its importance to communication, there is no benchmark for what is a just-noticeable—and possibly meaningful—difference in speech-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNR plays a crucial role in speech communication f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McShefferty, David, Whitmer, William M., Akeroyd, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4335553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25681327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515572316
_version_ 1782358361835044864
author McShefferty, David
Whitmer, William M.
Akeroyd, Michael A.
author_facet McShefferty, David
Whitmer, William M.
Akeroyd, Michael A.
author_sort McShefferty, David
collection PubMed
description Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) have been measured for various features of sounds, but despite its importance to communication, there is no benchmark for what is a just-noticeable—and possibly meaningful—difference in speech-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNR plays a crucial role in speech communication for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Difficulty hearing speech in background noise—a poor SNR—often leads to dissatisfaction with hearing-assistance devices. While such devices attempt through various strategies to address this problem, it is not currently known how much improvement in SNR is needed to provide a noticeable benefit. To investigate what is a noticeable benefit, we measured the JND in SNR for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Here, we report the SNR JNDs of 69 participants of varying hearing ability, estimated using either an adaptive or fixed-level procedure. The task was to judge which of the two intervals containing a sentence in speech-spectrum noise presented over headphones was clearer. The level of each interval was roved to reduce the influence of absolute level cues. The results of both procedures showed an average SNR JND of 3 dB that was independent of hearing ability. Further experiments using a subset of normal-hearing listeners showed that level roving does elevate threshold. These results suggest that noise reduction schemes may need to achieve a benefit greater than 3 dB to be reliably discriminable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4335553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43355532015-02-23 The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio McShefferty, David Whitmer, William M. Akeroyd, Michael A. Trends Hear Original Articles Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) have been measured for various features of sounds, but despite its importance to communication, there is no benchmark for what is a just-noticeable—and possibly meaningful—difference in speech-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNR plays a crucial role in speech communication for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Difficulty hearing speech in background noise—a poor SNR—often leads to dissatisfaction with hearing-assistance devices. While such devices attempt through various strategies to address this problem, it is not currently known how much improvement in SNR is needed to provide a noticeable benefit. To investigate what is a noticeable benefit, we measured the JND in SNR for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Here, we report the SNR JNDs of 69 participants of varying hearing ability, estimated using either an adaptive or fixed-level procedure. The task was to judge which of the two intervals containing a sentence in speech-spectrum noise presented over headphones was clearer. The level of each interval was roved to reduce the influence of absolute level cues. The results of both procedures showed an average SNR JND of 3 dB that was independent of hearing ability. Further experiments using a subset of normal-hearing listeners showed that level roving does elevate threshold. These results suggest that noise reduction schemes may need to achieve a benefit greater than 3 dB to be reliably discriminable. SAGE Publications 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4335553/ /pubmed/25681327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515572316 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Original Articles
McShefferty, David
Whitmer, William M.
Akeroyd, Michael A.
The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio
title The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio
title_full The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio
title_fullStr The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio
title_full_unstemmed The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio
title_short The Just-Noticeable Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio
title_sort just-noticeable difference in speech-to-noise ratio
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4335553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25681327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216515572316
work_keys_str_mv AT mcsheffertydavid thejustnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio
AT whitmerwilliamm thejustnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio
AT akeroydmichaela thejustnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio
AT mcsheffertydavid justnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio
AT whitmerwilliamm justnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio
AT akeroydmichaela justnoticeabledifferenceinspeechtonoiseratio