Cargando…
Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The effect of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the mortality rates and benefits of norepinephrine and vasopressin. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library database were searched from database inception t...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4336114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-9369-1-6 |
_version_ | 1782358425071517696 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Fei-Hu Song, Qing |
author_facet | Zhou, Fei-Hu Song, Qing |
author_sort | Zhou, Fei-Hu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The effect of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the mortality rates and benefits of norepinephrine and vasopressin. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library database were searched from database inception to December 2013. We selected randomized controlled trials in adults with septic shock and compared norepinephrine with vasopressin. After assessing the heterogeneity of treatment effects across trials using the I(2) statistic, we used a fixed effects model (P ≥ 0.1) and expressed the results as risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes or as standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.1 software. RESULTS: Seven trials (n = 2323) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the mortality rate in these seven trials was 36.2% (840/2323). There was no difference in mortality following the use of norepinephrine or vasopressin (RR 1.07; 95%CI 0.97-1.20; P = 0.19). Compared to norepinephrine, vasopressin had no significant effect on heart rate (HR) (SMD 0.21; 95%CI −0.08-0.50; P = 0.15), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (SMD 0.15; 95%CI −0.15-0.44; P = 0.33), cardiac index (CI) (SMD −0.10; 95%CI −0.64-0.44; P = 0.73), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (SMD 0.15; 95%CI −0.39-0.70; P = 0.58), oxygen delivery (DO(2)) (SMD −0.06; 95%CI −0.62-0.49; P = 0.82), oxygen consumption (VO(2)) (SMD 0.03; 95%CI −0.52-0.59; P = 0.91) or lactic acid (SMD 0.07; 95%CI −0.23-0.36; P = 0.66). No significant heterogeneity was found in these comparisons (P ≥ 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: There is not sufficient evidence to prove conclusively that norepinephrine is superior to vasopressin in terms of mortality and hemodynamics. The effects of norepinephrine and vasopressin on patients with septic shock require further study in large randomized controlled trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4336114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43361142015-02-26 Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis Zhou, Fei-Hu Song, Qing Mil Med Res Research BACKGROUND: The effect of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the mortality rates and benefits of norepinephrine and vasopressin. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library database were searched from database inception to December 2013. We selected randomized controlled trials in adults with septic shock and compared norepinephrine with vasopressin. After assessing the heterogeneity of treatment effects across trials using the I(2) statistic, we used a fixed effects model (P ≥ 0.1) and expressed the results as risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes or as standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.1 software. RESULTS: Seven trials (n = 2323) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the mortality rate in these seven trials was 36.2% (840/2323). There was no difference in mortality following the use of norepinephrine or vasopressin (RR 1.07; 95%CI 0.97-1.20; P = 0.19). Compared to norepinephrine, vasopressin had no significant effect on heart rate (HR) (SMD 0.21; 95%CI −0.08-0.50; P = 0.15), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (SMD 0.15; 95%CI −0.15-0.44; P = 0.33), cardiac index (CI) (SMD −0.10; 95%CI −0.64-0.44; P = 0.73), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (SMD 0.15; 95%CI −0.39-0.70; P = 0.58), oxygen delivery (DO(2)) (SMD −0.06; 95%CI −0.62-0.49; P = 0.82), oxygen consumption (VO(2)) (SMD 0.03; 95%CI −0.52-0.59; P = 0.91) or lactic acid (SMD 0.07; 95%CI −0.23-0.36; P = 0.66). No significant heterogeneity was found in these comparisons (P ≥ 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: There is not sufficient evidence to prove conclusively that norepinephrine is superior to vasopressin in terms of mortality and hemodynamics. The effects of norepinephrine and vasopressin on patients with septic shock require further study in large randomized controlled trials. BioMed Central 2014-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4336114/ /pubmed/25722864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-9369-1-6 Text en © Zhou and Song; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhou, Fei-Hu Song, Qing Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis |
title | Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4336114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2054-9369-1-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoufeihu clinicaltrialscomparingnorepinephrinewithvasopressininpatientswithsepticshockametaanalysis AT songqing clinicaltrialscomparingnorepinephrinewithvasopressininpatientswithsepticshockametaanalysis |