Cargando…

Activity of Heat Shock Genes’ Promoters in Thermally Contrasting Animal Species

Heat shock gene promoters represent a highly conserved and universal system for the rapid induction of transcription after various stressful stimuli. We chose pairs of mammalian and insect species that significantly differ in their thermoresistance and constitutive levels of Hsp70 to compare hsp pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astakhova, Lyubov N., Zatsepina, Olga G., Funikov, Sergei Yu., Zelentsova, Elena S., Schostak, Natalia G., Orishchenko, Konstantin E., Evgen’ev, Michael B., Garbuz, David G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4336284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25700087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115536
_version_ 1782358443113316352
author Astakhova, Lyubov N.
Zatsepina, Olga G.
Funikov, Sergei Yu.
Zelentsova, Elena S.
Schostak, Natalia G.
Orishchenko, Konstantin E.
Evgen’ev, Michael B.
Garbuz, David G.
author_facet Astakhova, Lyubov N.
Zatsepina, Olga G.
Funikov, Sergei Yu.
Zelentsova, Elena S.
Schostak, Natalia G.
Orishchenko, Konstantin E.
Evgen’ev, Michael B.
Garbuz, David G.
author_sort Astakhova, Lyubov N.
collection PubMed
description Heat shock gene promoters represent a highly conserved and universal system for the rapid induction of transcription after various stressful stimuli. We chose pairs of mammalian and insect species that significantly differ in their thermoresistance and constitutive levels of Hsp70 to compare hsp promoter strength under normal conditions and after heat shock (HS). The first pair includes the HSPA1 gene promoter of camel (Camelus dromedarius) and humans. It was demonstrated that the camel HSPA1A and HSPA1L promoters function normally in vitro in human cell cultures and exceed the strength of orthologous human promoters under basal conditions. We used the same in vitro assay for Drosophila melanogaster Schneider-2 (S2) cells to compare the activity of the hsp70 and hsp83 promoters of the second species pair represented by Diptera, i.e., Stratiomys singularior and D. melanogaster, which dramatically differ in thermoresistance and the pattern of Hsp70 accumulation. Promoter strength was also monitored in vivo in D. melanogaster strains transformed with constructs containing the S. singularior hsp70 ORF driven either by its own promoter or an orthologous promoter from the D. melanogaster hsp70Aa gene. Analysis revealed low S. singularior hsp70 promoter activity in vitro and in vivo under basal conditions and after HS in comparison with the endogenous promoter in D. melanogaster cells, which correlates with the absence of canonical GAGA elements in the promoters of the former species. Indeed, the insertion of GAGA elements into the S. singularior hsp70 regulatory region resulted in a dramatic increase in promoter activity in vitro but only modestly enhanced the promoter strength in the larvae of the transformed strains. In contrast with hsp70 promoters, hsp83 promoters from both of the studied Diptera species demonstrated high conservation and universality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4336284
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43362842015-02-24 Activity of Heat Shock Genes’ Promoters in Thermally Contrasting Animal Species Astakhova, Lyubov N. Zatsepina, Olga G. Funikov, Sergei Yu. Zelentsova, Elena S. Schostak, Natalia G. Orishchenko, Konstantin E. Evgen’ev, Michael B. Garbuz, David G. PLoS One Research Article Heat shock gene promoters represent a highly conserved and universal system for the rapid induction of transcription after various stressful stimuli. We chose pairs of mammalian and insect species that significantly differ in their thermoresistance and constitutive levels of Hsp70 to compare hsp promoter strength under normal conditions and after heat shock (HS). The first pair includes the HSPA1 gene promoter of camel (Camelus dromedarius) and humans. It was demonstrated that the camel HSPA1A and HSPA1L promoters function normally in vitro in human cell cultures and exceed the strength of orthologous human promoters under basal conditions. We used the same in vitro assay for Drosophila melanogaster Schneider-2 (S2) cells to compare the activity of the hsp70 and hsp83 promoters of the second species pair represented by Diptera, i.e., Stratiomys singularior and D. melanogaster, which dramatically differ in thermoresistance and the pattern of Hsp70 accumulation. Promoter strength was also monitored in vivo in D. melanogaster strains transformed with constructs containing the S. singularior hsp70 ORF driven either by its own promoter or an orthologous promoter from the D. melanogaster hsp70Aa gene. Analysis revealed low S. singularior hsp70 promoter activity in vitro and in vivo under basal conditions and after HS in comparison with the endogenous promoter in D. melanogaster cells, which correlates with the absence of canonical GAGA elements in the promoters of the former species. Indeed, the insertion of GAGA elements into the S. singularior hsp70 regulatory region resulted in a dramatic increase in promoter activity in vitro but only modestly enhanced the promoter strength in the larvae of the transformed strains. In contrast with hsp70 promoters, hsp83 promoters from both of the studied Diptera species demonstrated high conservation and universality. Public Library of Science 2015-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4336284/ /pubmed/25700087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115536 Text en © 2015 Astakhova et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Astakhova, Lyubov N.
Zatsepina, Olga G.
Funikov, Sergei Yu.
Zelentsova, Elena S.
Schostak, Natalia G.
Orishchenko, Konstantin E.
Evgen’ev, Michael B.
Garbuz, David G.
Activity of Heat Shock Genes’ Promoters in Thermally Contrasting Animal Species
title Activity of Heat Shock Genes’ Promoters in Thermally Contrasting Animal Species
title_full Activity of Heat Shock Genes’ Promoters in Thermally Contrasting Animal Species
title_fullStr Activity of Heat Shock Genes’ Promoters in Thermally Contrasting Animal Species
title_full_unstemmed Activity of Heat Shock Genes’ Promoters in Thermally Contrasting Animal Species
title_short Activity of Heat Shock Genes’ Promoters in Thermally Contrasting Animal Species
title_sort activity of heat shock genes’ promoters in thermally contrasting animal species
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4336284/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25700087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115536
work_keys_str_mv AT astakhovalyubovn activityofheatshockgenespromotersinthermallycontrastinganimalspecies
AT zatsepinaolgag activityofheatshockgenespromotersinthermallycontrastinganimalspecies
AT funikovsergeiyu activityofheatshockgenespromotersinthermallycontrastinganimalspecies
AT zelentsovaelenas activityofheatshockgenespromotersinthermallycontrastinganimalspecies
AT schostaknataliag activityofheatshockgenespromotersinthermallycontrastinganimalspecies
AT orishchenkokonstantine activityofheatshockgenespromotersinthermallycontrastinganimalspecies
AT evgenevmichaelb activityofheatshockgenespromotersinthermallycontrastinganimalspecies
AT garbuzdavidg activityofheatshockgenespromotersinthermallycontrastinganimalspecies