Cargando…

Periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteoconductive bone graft versus combination of osteoconductive and osteostimulative bone graft: A comparative study

BACKGROUND: Bone loss is one of the hallmarks of periodontitis. Hence, a major focus of research into periodontal regeneration has concentrated on the initiation of Osteogenesis. Osteoinduction requires the differentiation of mesenchymal cells into osteoblasts with subsequent formation of new bone....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahajan, Anushi, Kedige, Suresh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4336968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709671
_version_ 1782358532425777152
author Mahajan, Anushi
Kedige, Suresh
author_facet Mahajan, Anushi
Kedige, Suresh
author_sort Mahajan, Anushi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bone loss is one of the hallmarks of periodontitis. Hence, a major focus of research into periodontal regeneration has concentrated on the initiation of Osteogenesis. Osteoinduction requires the differentiation of mesenchymal cells into osteoblasts with subsequent formation of new bone. The present study has been carried out to evaluate periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteostimulative oleaginous calcium hydroxide suspension Osteora(®) (Metacura, Germany) in combination with osteoconductive bone graft Ossifi™ (Equinox Medical Technologies, Holland). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 sites in patients within the age range of 25-50 years, with intrabony defects were selected and divided into two groups (Group A and Group B) by using the split-mouth design technique. All the selected sites were assessed with the clinical parameters such as - Plaque Index, Gingival Index, Sulcus Bleeding Index, Periodontal Probing Depth, Clinical Attachment Level, Gingival Recession and radiographic parameter to assess the amount of Defect Fill. Mann-Whitey U-test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test has been used to find the significance of study parameters on continuous scale for the comparison between the mesial and distal bone levels. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Osteora(®) in combination with osteoconductive Ossifi™ showed better regenerative potential and more significant amount of bone fill in periodontal intrabony defects than when Ossifi™ was used alone (P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Osteora(®) can be used as an adjunct to osteoconductive bone grafts, as an osteo-stimulating agent in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4336968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43369682015-02-23 Periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteoconductive bone graft versus combination of osteoconductive and osteostimulative bone graft: A comparative study Mahajan, Anushi Kedige, Suresh Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Bone loss is one of the hallmarks of periodontitis. Hence, a major focus of research into periodontal regeneration has concentrated on the initiation of Osteogenesis. Osteoinduction requires the differentiation of mesenchymal cells into osteoblasts with subsequent formation of new bone. The present study has been carried out to evaluate periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteostimulative oleaginous calcium hydroxide suspension Osteora(®) (Metacura, Germany) in combination with osteoconductive bone graft Ossifi™ (Equinox Medical Technologies, Holland). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 22 sites in patients within the age range of 25-50 years, with intrabony defects were selected and divided into two groups (Group A and Group B) by using the split-mouth design technique. All the selected sites were assessed with the clinical parameters such as - Plaque Index, Gingival Index, Sulcus Bleeding Index, Periodontal Probing Depth, Clinical Attachment Level, Gingival Recession and radiographic parameter to assess the amount of Defect Fill. Mann-Whitey U-test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test has been used to find the significance of study parameters on continuous scale for the comparison between the mesial and distal bone levels. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Osteora(®) in combination with osteoconductive Ossifi™ showed better regenerative potential and more significant amount of bone fill in periodontal intrabony defects than when Ossifi™ was used alone (P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Osteora(®) can be used as an adjunct to osteoconductive bone grafts, as an osteo-stimulating agent in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4336968/ /pubmed/25709671 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mahajan, Anushi
Kedige, Suresh
Periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteoconductive bone graft versus combination of osteoconductive and osteostimulative bone graft: A comparative study
title Periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteoconductive bone graft versus combination of osteoconductive and osteostimulative bone graft: A comparative study
title_full Periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteoconductive bone graft versus combination of osteoconductive and osteostimulative bone graft: A comparative study
title_fullStr Periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteoconductive bone graft versus combination of osteoconductive and osteostimulative bone graft: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteoconductive bone graft versus combination of osteoconductive and osteostimulative bone graft: A comparative study
title_short Periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteoconductive bone graft versus combination of osteoconductive and osteostimulative bone graft: A comparative study
title_sort periodontal bone regeneration in intrabony defects using osteoconductive bone graft versus combination of osteoconductive and osteostimulative bone graft: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4336968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709671
work_keys_str_mv AT mahajananushi periodontalboneregenerationinintrabonydefectsusingosteoconductivebonegraftversuscombinationofosteoconductiveandosteostimulativebonegraftacomparativestudy
AT kedigesuresh periodontalboneregenerationinintrabonydefectsusingosteoconductivebonegraftversuscombinationofosteoconductiveandosteostimulativebonegraftacomparativestudy