Cargando…

Stability of changes in mandibular intermolar and intercuspid distances following orthodontic treatment

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the pattern and amount of change exhibited in mandibular intercanine and intermolar width during treatment and assessing its stability1-3 years post-retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The material consisted of 70 cases of which 20 cases were treated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motamedi, Alimohammad K., Dadgar, Sepideh, Teimouri, Fatemeh, Aslani, Farzin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4336975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709678
_version_ 1782358534819676160
author Motamedi, Alimohammad K.
Dadgar, Sepideh
Teimouri, Fatemeh
Aslani, Farzin
author_facet Motamedi, Alimohammad K.
Dadgar, Sepideh
Teimouri, Fatemeh
Aslani, Farzin
author_sort Motamedi, Alimohammad K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the pattern and amount of change exhibited in mandibular intercanine and intermolar width during treatment and assessing its stability1-3 years post-retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The material consisted of 70 cases of which 20 cases were treated without extraction and 30 cases were treated with extraction, which were compared with 20 untreated cases which served as a control group. A series of three measurements were made for each case of the treated group: At the beginning of treatment, end of active treatment and 1-3 years post-retention; and for the control group: At 12, 15 and 18 years of age. The Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used to evaluate treatment changes in each group. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare the treatment changes between the 3 groups (α = 0.05). SPSS 16 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: Mean changes of intercanine width for three groups was −0.5 mm for control group, −0.26 mm for non-extraction group and +0.18 mm for extraction group. Intermolar width of the extraction group decreased significantly during treatment. In contrast to the extraction group, the control and non-extraction groups both demonstrated an increase in mean intermolar width which was 0.66 mm and 0.91 mm respectively. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that although mean changes of intercanine and intermolar width were statistically significant but they were not perceptible clinically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4336975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43369752015-02-23 Stability of changes in mandibular intermolar and intercuspid distances following orthodontic treatment Motamedi, Alimohammad K. Dadgar, Sepideh Teimouri, Fatemeh Aslani, Farzin Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the pattern and amount of change exhibited in mandibular intercanine and intermolar width during treatment and assessing its stability1-3 years post-retention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The material consisted of 70 cases of which 20 cases were treated without extraction and 30 cases were treated with extraction, which were compared with 20 untreated cases which served as a control group. A series of three measurements were made for each case of the treated group: At the beginning of treatment, end of active treatment and 1-3 years post-retention; and for the control group: At 12, 15 and 18 years of age. The Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used to evaluate treatment changes in each group. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare the treatment changes between the 3 groups (α = 0.05). SPSS 16 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to evaluate the data. RESULTS: Mean changes of intercanine width for three groups was −0.5 mm for control group, −0.26 mm for non-extraction group and +0.18 mm for extraction group. Intermolar width of the extraction group decreased significantly during treatment. In contrast to the extraction group, the control and non-extraction groups both demonstrated an increase in mean intermolar width which was 0.66 mm and 0.91 mm respectively. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that although mean changes of intercanine and intermolar width were statistically significant but they were not perceptible clinically. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4336975/ /pubmed/25709678 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Motamedi, Alimohammad K.
Dadgar, Sepideh
Teimouri, Fatemeh
Aslani, Farzin
Stability of changes in mandibular intermolar and intercuspid distances following orthodontic treatment
title Stability of changes in mandibular intermolar and intercuspid distances following orthodontic treatment
title_full Stability of changes in mandibular intermolar and intercuspid distances following orthodontic treatment
title_fullStr Stability of changes in mandibular intermolar and intercuspid distances following orthodontic treatment
title_full_unstemmed Stability of changes in mandibular intermolar and intercuspid distances following orthodontic treatment
title_short Stability of changes in mandibular intermolar and intercuspid distances following orthodontic treatment
title_sort stability of changes in mandibular intermolar and intercuspid distances following orthodontic treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4336975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25709678
work_keys_str_mv AT motamedialimohammadk stabilityofchangesinmandibularintermolarandintercuspiddistancesfollowingorthodontictreatment
AT dadgarsepideh stabilityofchangesinmandibularintermolarandintercuspiddistancesfollowingorthodontictreatment
AT teimourifatemeh stabilityofchangesinmandibularintermolarandintercuspiddistancesfollowingorthodontictreatment
AT aslanifarzin stabilityofchangesinmandibularintermolarandintercuspiddistancesfollowingorthodontictreatment