Cargando…

Radiographic adenoid evaluation: proposal of an objective parameter

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate current radiographic parameters designed to investigate adenoid hypertrophy and nasopharyngeal obstruction, and to present an alternative radiographic assessment method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to do so, children (4 to14 years old...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feres, Murilo Fernando Neuppmann, Hermann, Juliana Sato, Sallum, Ana Carolina, Pignatari, Shirley Shizue Nagata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4337152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25741053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-39842014000200008
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to evaluate current radiographic parameters designed to investigate adenoid hypertrophy and nasopharyngeal obstruction, and to present an alternative radiographic assessment method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In order to do so, children (4 to14 years old) who presented with nasal obstruction or oral breathing complaints were submitted to cavum radiographic examination. One hundred and twenty records were evaluated according to quantitative radiographic parameters, and data were correlated with a gold-standard videonasopharyngoscopic study, in relation to the percentage of choanal obstruction. Subsequently, a regression analysis was performed in order to create an original model so the percentage of the choanal obstruction could be predicted. RESULTS: The quantitative parameters demonstrated moderate, if not weak correlation with the real percentage of choanal obstruction. The regression model (110.119*A/N) demonstrated a satisfactory ability to "predict" the actual percentage of choanal obstruction. CONCLUSION: Since current adenoid quantitative radiographic parameters present limitations, the model presented by the present study might be considered as an alternative assessment method in cases where videonasopharyngoscopic evaluation is unavailable.