Cargando…
The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics
The language of “personalized medicine” and “personal genomics” has now entered the common lexicon. The idea of personalized medicine is the integration of genomic risk assessment alongside other clinical investigations. Consistent with this approach, testing is delivered by health care professional...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4337712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25733939 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S58728 |
_version_ | 1782481104227270656 |
---|---|
author | Wilson, Brenda J Nicholls, Stuart G |
author_facet | Wilson, Brenda J Nicholls, Stuart G |
author_sort | Wilson, Brenda J |
collection | PubMed |
description | The language of “personalized medicine” and “personal genomics” has now entered the common lexicon. The idea of personalized medicine is the integration of genomic risk assessment alongside other clinical investigations. Consistent with this approach, testing is delivered by health care professionals who are not medical geneticists, and where results represent risks, as opposed to clinical diagnosis of disease, to be interpreted alongside the entirety of a patient’s health and medical data. In this review we consider the evidence concerning the application of such personalized genomics within the context of population screening, and potential implications that arise from this. We highlight two general approaches which illustrate potential uses of genomic information in screening. The first is a narrowly targeted approach in which genetic profiling is linked with standard population-based screening for diseases; the second is a broader targeting of variants associated with multiple single gene disorders, performed opportunistically on patients being investigated for unrelated conditions. In doing so we consider the organization and evaluation of tests and services, the challenge of interpretation with less targeted testing, professional confidence, barriers in practice, and education needs. We conclude by discussing several issues pertinent to health policy, namely: avoiding the conflation of genetics with biological determinism, resisting the “technological imperative”, due consideration of the organization of screening services, the need for professional education, as well as informed decision making and public understanding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4337712 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43377122015-03-02 The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics Wilson, Brenda J Nicholls, Stuart G Risk Manag Healthc Policy Review The language of “personalized medicine” and “personal genomics” has now entered the common lexicon. The idea of personalized medicine is the integration of genomic risk assessment alongside other clinical investigations. Consistent with this approach, testing is delivered by health care professionals who are not medical geneticists, and where results represent risks, as opposed to clinical diagnosis of disease, to be interpreted alongside the entirety of a patient’s health and medical data. In this review we consider the evidence concerning the application of such personalized genomics within the context of population screening, and potential implications that arise from this. We highlight two general approaches which illustrate potential uses of genomic information in screening. The first is a narrowly targeted approach in which genetic profiling is linked with standard population-based screening for diseases; the second is a broader targeting of variants associated with multiple single gene disorders, performed opportunistically on patients being investigated for unrelated conditions. In doing so we consider the organization and evaluation of tests and services, the challenge of interpretation with less targeted testing, professional confidence, barriers in practice, and education needs. We conclude by discussing several issues pertinent to health policy, namely: avoiding the conflation of genetics with biological determinism, resisting the “technological imperative”, due consideration of the organization of screening services, the need for professional education, as well as informed decision making and public understanding. Dove Medical Press 2015-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4337712/ /pubmed/25733939 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S58728 Text en © 2015 Wilson and Nicholls. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Wilson, Brenda J Nicholls, Stuart G The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics |
title | The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics |
title_full | The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics |
title_fullStr | The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics |
title_full_unstemmed | The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics |
title_short | The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics |
title_sort | human genome project, and recent advances in personalized genomics |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4337712/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25733939 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S58728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wilsonbrendaj thehumangenomeprojectandrecentadvancesinpersonalizedgenomics AT nichollsstuartg thehumangenomeprojectandrecentadvancesinpersonalizedgenomics AT wilsonbrendaj humangenomeprojectandrecentadvancesinpersonalizedgenomics AT nichollsstuartg humangenomeprojectandrecentadvancesinpersonalizedgenomics |