Cargando…

The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics

The language of “personalized medicine” and “personal genomics” has now entered the common lexicon. The idea of personalized medicine is the integration of genomic risk assessment alongside other clinical investigations. Consistent with this approach, testing is delivered by health care professional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Brenda J, Nicholls, Stuart G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4337712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25733939
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S58728
_version_ 1782481104227270656
author Wilson, Brenda J
Nicholls, Stuart G
author_facet Wilson, Brenda J
Nicholls, Stuart G
author_sort Wilson, Brenda J
collection PubMed
description The language of “personalized medicine” and “personal genomics” has now entered the common lexicon. The idea of personalized medicine is the integration of genomic risk assessment alongside other clinical investigations. Consistent with this approach, testing is delivered by health care professionals who are not medical geneticists, and where results represent risks, as opposed to clinical diagnosis of disease, to be interpreted alongside the entirety of a patient’s health and medical data. In this review we consider the evidence concerning the application of such personalized genomics within the context of population screening, and potential implications that arise from this. We highlight two general approaches which illustrate potential uses of genomic information in screening. The first is a narrowly targeted approach in which genetic profiling is linked with standard population-based screening for diseases; the second is a broader targeting of variants associated with multiple single gene disorders, performed opportunistically on patients being investigated for unrelated conditions. In doing so we consider the organization and evaluation of tests and services, the challenge of interpretation with less targeted testing, professional confidence, barriers in practice, and education needs. We conclude by discussing several issues pertinent to health policy, namely: avoiding the conflation of genetics with biological determinism, resisting the “technological imperative”, due consideration of the organization of screening services, the need for professional education, as well as informed decision making and public understanding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4337712
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43377122015-03-02 The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics Wilson, Brenda J Nicholls, Stuart G Risk Manag Healthc Policy Review The language of “personalized medicine” and “personal genomics” has now entered the common lexicon. The idea of personalized medicine is the integration of genomic risk assessment alongside other clinical investigations. Consistent with this approach, testing is delivered by health care professionals who are not medical geneticists, and where results represent risks, as opposed to clinical diagnosis of disease, to be interpreted alongside the entirety of a patient’s health and medical data. In this review we consider the evidence concerning the application of such personalized genomics within the context of population screening, and potential implications that arise from this. We highlight two general approaches which illustrate potential uses of genomic information in screening. The first is a narrowly targeted approach in which genetic profiling is linked with standard population-based screening for diseases; the second is a broader targeting of variants associated with multiple single gene disorders, performed opportunistically on patients being investigated for unrelated conditions. In doing so we consider the organization and evaluation of tests and services, the challenge of interpretation with less targeted testing, professional confidence, barriers in practice, and education needs. We conclude by discussing several issues pertinent to health policy, namely: avoiding the conflation of genetics with biological determinism, resisting the “technological imperative”, due consideration of the organization of screening services, the need for professional education, as well as informed decision making and public understanding. Dove Medical Press 2015-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4337712/ /pubmed/25733939 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S58728 Text en © 2015 Wilson and Nicholls. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Wilson, Brenda J
Nicholls, Stuart G
The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics
title The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics
title_full The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics
title_fullStr The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics
title_full_unstemmed The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics
title_short The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics
title_sort human genome project, and recent advances in personalized genomics
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4337712/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25733939
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S58728
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonbrendaj thehumangenomeprojectandrecentadvancesinpersonalizedgenomics
AT nichollsstuartg thehumangenomeprojectandrecentadvancesinpersonalizedgenomics
AT wilsonbrendaj humangenomeprojectandrecentadvancesinpersonalizedgenomics
AT nichollsstuartg humangenomeprojectandrecentadvancesinpersonalizedgenomics