Cargando…

Trends in Diabetes Incidence: The Framingham Heart Study

OBJECTIVE: Obesity and type 2 diabetes continue to increase in prevalence in the U.S. Whether diabetes incidence continues to increase in recent times is less well documented. We examined trends in diabetes incidence over the previous four decades. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Framingham Heart Study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abraham, Tobin M., Pencina, Karol M., Pencina, Michael J., Fox, Caroline S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25552418
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc14-1432
_version_ 1782481228351406080
author Abraham, Tobin M.
Pencina, Karol M.
Pencina, Michael J.
Fox, Caroline S.
author_facet Abraham, Tobin M.
Pencina, Karol M.
Pencina, Michael J.
Fox, Caroline S.
author_sort Abraham, Tobin M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Obesity and type 2 diabetes continue to increase in prevalence in the U.S. Whether diabetes incidence continues to increase in recent times is less well documented. We examined trends in diabetes incidence over the previous four decades. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Framingham Heart Study participants ages 40–55 years and free of diabetes at baseline (n = 4,795; mean age 45.3 years; 51.6% women) were followed for the development of diabetes in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. Diabetes was defined as either fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL or use of antidiabetes medication. Poisson regression was used to calculate sex-specific diabetes incidence rates for a 47-year-old individual in each decade. Rates were also calculated among obese, overweight, and normal weight individuals. RESULTS: The annualized rates of diabetes per 1,000 individuals were 2.6, 3.8, 4.7, and 3.0 (women) and 3.4, 4.5, 7.4, and 7.3 (men) in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, respectively. Compared with the 1970s, the age- and sex-adjusted relative risks of diabetes were 1.37 (95% CI 0.87–2.16; P = 0.17), 1.99 (95% CI 1.30–3.03; P = 0.001), and 1.81 (95% CI 1.16–2.82; P = 0.01) in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, respectively. Compared with the 1990s, the relative risk of diabetes in the 2000s was 0.85 (95% CI 0.61–1.20; P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: In our community-based sample, the risk of new-onset diabetes continued to be higher in the 2000s compared with the 1970s. In the past decade, diabetes incidence remained steady despite the ongoing trend of rising adiposity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4338506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43385062016-03-01 Trends in Diabetes Incidence: The Framingham Heart Study Abraham, Tobin M. Pencina, Karol M. Pencina, Michael J. Fox, Caroline S. Diabetes Care Epidemiology/Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: Obesity and type 2 diabetes continue to increase in prevalence in the U.S. Whether diabetes incidence continues to increase in recent times is less well documented. We examined trends in diabetes incidence over the previous four decades. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Framingham Heart Study participants ages 40–55 years and free of diabetes at baseline (n = 4,795; mean age 45.3 years; 51.6% women) were followed for the development of diabetes in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. Diabetes was defined as either fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL or use of antidiabetes medication. Poisson regression was used to calculate sex-specific diabetes incidence rates for a 47-year-old individual in each decade. Rates were also calculated among obese, overweight, and normal weight individuals. RESULTS: The annualized rates of diabetes per 1,000 individuals were 2.6, 3.8, 4.7, and 3.0 (women) and 3.4, 4.5, 7.4, and 7.3 (men) in the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, respectively. Compared with the 1970s, the age- and sex-adjusted relative risks of diabetes were 1.37 (95% CI 0.87–2.16; P = 0.17), 1.99 (95% CI 1.30–3.03; P = 0.001), and 1.81 (95% CI 1.16–2.82; P = 0.01) in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s, respectively. Compared with the 1990s, the relative risk of diabetes in the 2000s was 0.85 (95% CI 0.61–1.20; P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: In our community-based sample, the risk of new-onset diabetes continued to be higher in the 2000s compared with the 1970s. In the past decade, diabetes incidence remained steady despite the ongoing trend of rising adiposity. American Diabetes Association 2015-03 2014-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4338506/ /pubmed/25552418 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc14-1432 Text en © 2015 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.
spellingShingle Epidemiology/Health Services Research
Abraham, Tobin M.
Pencina, Karol M.
Pencina, Michael J.
Fox, Caroline S.
Trends in Diabetes Incidence: The Framingham Heart Study
title Trends in Diabetes Incidence: The Framingham Heart Study
title_full Trends in Diabetes Incidence: The Framingham Heart Study
title_fullStr Trends in Diabetes Incidence: The Framingham Heart Study
title_full_unstemmed Trends in Diabetes Incidence: The Framingham Heart Study
title_short Trends in Diabetes Incidence: The Framingham Heart Study
title_sort trends in diabetes incidence: the framingham heart study
topic Epidemiology/Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25552418
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc14-1432
work_keys_str_mv AT abrahamtobinm trendsindiabetesincidencetheframinghamheartstudy
AT pencinakarolm trendsindiabetesincidencetheframinghamheartstudy
AT pencinamichaelj trendsindiabetesincidencetheframinghamheartstudy
AT foxcarolines trendsindiabetesincidencetheframinghamheartstudy