Cargando…
Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae
Pathogenic strains of Vibrio cholerae are responsible for endemic and pandemic outbreaks of the disease cholera. The complete toxigenic mechanisms underlying virulence in Vibrio strains are poorly understood. The hypothesis of this work was that virulent versus non-virulent strains of V. cholerae ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722857 http://dx.doi.org/10.7243/2052-7993-2-1 |
_version_ | 1782481235086409728 |
---|---|
author | Mukherjee, Munmun Kakarla, Prathusha Kumar, Sanath Gonzalez, Esmeralda Floyd, Jared T. Inupakutika, Madhuri Devireddy, Amith Reddy Tirrell, Selena R. Bruns, Merissa He, Guixin Lindquist, Ingrid E. Sundararajan, Anitha Schilkey, Faye D. Mudge, Joann Varela, Manuel F. |
author_facet | Mukherjee, Munmun Kakarla, Prathusha Kumar, Sanath Gonzalez, Esmeralda Floyd, Jared T. Inupakutika, Madhuri Devireddy, Amith Reddy Tirrell, Selena R. Bruns, Merissa He, Guixin Lindquist, Ingrid E. Sundararajan, Anitha Schilkey, Faye D. Mudge, Joann Varela, Manuel F. |
author_sort | Mukherjee, Munmun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pathogenic strains of Vibrio cholerae are responsible for endemic and pandemic outbreaks of the disease cholera. The complete toxigenic mechanisms underlying virulence in Vibrio strains are poorly understood. The hypothesis of this work was that virulent versus non-virulent strains of V. cholerae harbor distinctive genomic elements that encode virulence. The purpose of this study was to elucidate genomic differences between the O1 serotypes and non-O1 V. cholerae PS15, a non-toxigenic strain, in order to identify novel genes potentially responsible for virulence. In this study, we compared the whole genome of the non-O1 PS15 strain to the whole genomes of toxigenic serotypes at the phylogenetic level, and found that the PS15 genome was distantly related to those of toxigenic V. cholerae. Thus we focused on a detailed gene comparison between PS15 and the distantly related O1 V. cholerae N16961. Based on sequence alignment we tentatively assigned chromosome numbers 1 and 2 to elements within the genome of non-O1 V. cholerae PS15. Further, we found that PS15 and O1 V. cholerae N16961 shared 98% identity and 766 genes, but of the genes present in N16961 that were missing in the non-O1 V. cholerae PS15 genome, 56 were predicted to encode not only for virulence–related genes (colonization, antimicrobial resistance, and regulation of persister cells) but also genes involved in the metabolic biosynthesis of lipids, nucleosides and sulfur compounds. Additionally, we found 113 genes unique to PS15 that were predicted to encode other properties related to virulence, disease, defense, membrane transport, and DNA metabolism. Here, we identified distinctive and novel genomic elements between O1 and non-O1 V. cholerae genomes as potential virulence factors and, thus, targets for future therapeutics. Modulation of such novel targets may eventually enhance eradication efforts of endemic and pandemic disease cholera in afflicted nations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4338557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43385572015-02-24 Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae Mukherjee, Munmun Kakarla, Prathusha Kumar, Sanath Gonzalez, Esmeralda Floyd, Jared T. Inupakutika, Madhuri Devireddy, Amith Reddy Tirrell, Selena R. Bruns, Merissa He, Guixin Lindquist, Ingrid E. Sundararajan, Anitha Schilkey, Faye D. Mudge, Joann Varela, Manuel F. Genom Discov Article Pathogenic strains of Vibrio cholerae are responsible for endemic and pandemic outbreaks of the disease cholera. The complete toxigenic mechanisms underlying virulence in Vibrio strains are poorly understood. The hypothesis of this work was that virulent versus non-virulent strains of V. cholerae harbor distinctive genomic elements that encode virulence. The purpose of this study was to elucidate genomic differences between the O1 serotypes and non-O1 V. cholerae PS15, a non-toxigenic strain, in order to identify novel genes potentially responsible for virulence. In this study, we compared the whole genome of the non-O1 PS15 strain to the whole genomes of toxigenic serotypes at the phylogenetic level, and found that the PS15 genome was distantly related to those of toxigenic V. cholerae. Thus we focused on a detailed gene comparison between PS15 and the distantly related O1 V. cholerae N16961. Based on sequence alignment we tentatively assigned chromosome numbers 1 and 2 to elements within the genome of non-O1 V. cholerae PS15. Further, we found that PS15 and O1 V. cholerae N16961 shared 98% identity and 766 genes, but of the genes present in N16961 that were missing in the non-O1 V. cholerae PS15 genome, 56 were predicted to encode not only for virulence–related genes (colonization, antimicrobial resistance, and regulation of persister cells) but also genes involved in the metabolic biosynthesis of lipids, nucleosides and sulfur compounds. Additionally, we found 113 genes unique to PS15 that were predicted to encode other properties related to virulence, disease, defense, membrane transport, and DNA metabolism. Here, we identified distinctive and novel genomic elements between O1 and non-O1 V. cholerae genomes as potential virulence factors and, thus, targets for future therapeutics. Modulation of such novel targets may eventually enhance eradication efforts of endemic and pandemic disease cholera in afflicted nations. 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4338557/ /pubmed/25722857 http://dx.doi.org/10.7243/2052-7993-2-1 Text en © 2014 Varela et al; licensee Herbert Publications Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0). This permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Mukherjee, Munmun Kakarla, Prathusha Kumar, Sanath Gonzalez, Esmeralda Floyd, Jared T. Inupakutika, Madhuri Devireddy, Amith Reddy Tirrell, Selena R. Bruns, Merissa He, Guixin Lindquist, Ingrid E. Sundararajan, Anitha Schilkey, Faye D. Mudge, Joann Varela, Manuel F. Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae |
title | Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae |
title_full | Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae |
title_fullStr | Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae |
title_short | Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae |
title_sort | comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-o1 versus toxigenic o1 vibrio cholerae |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722857 http://dx.doi.org/10.7243/2052-7993-2-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mukherjeemunmun comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT kakarlaprathusha comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT kumarsanath comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT gonzalezesmeralda comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT floydjaredt comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT inupakutikamadhuri comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT devireddyamithreddy comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT tirrellselenar comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT brunsmerissa comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT heguixin comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT lindquistingride comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT sundararajananitha comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT schilkeyfayed comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT mudgejoann comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae AT varelamanuelf comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae |