Cargando…

Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae

Pathogenic strains of Vibrio cholerae are responsible for endemic and pandemic outbreaks of the disease cholera. The complete toxigenic mechanisms underlying virulence in Vibrio strains are poorly understood. The hypothesis of this work was that virulent versus non-virulent strains of V. cholerae ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mukherjee, Munmun, Kakarla, Prathusha, Kumar, Sanath, Gonzalez, Esmeralda, Floyd, Jared T., Inupakutika, Madhuri, Devireddy, Amith Reddy, Tirrell, Selena R., Bruns, Merissa, He, Guixin, Lindquist, Ingrid E., Sundararajan, Anitha, Schilkey, Faye D., Mudge, Joann, Varela, Manuel F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722857
http://dx.doi.org/10.7243/2052-7993-2-1
_version_ 1782481235086409728
author Mukherjee, Munmun
Kakarla, Prathusha
Kumar, Sanath
Gonzalez, Esmeralda
Floyd, Jared T.
Inupakutika, Madhuri
Devireddy, Amith Reddy
Tirrell, Selena R.
Bruns, Merissa
He, Guixin
Lindquist, Ingrid E.
Sundararajan, Anitha
Schilkey, Faye D.
Mudge, Joann
Varela, Manuel F.
author_facet Mukherjee, Munmun
Kakarla, Prathusha
Kumar, Sanath
Gonzalez, Esmeralda
Floyd, Jared T.
Inupakutika, Madhuri
Devireddy, Amith Reddy
Tirrell, Selena R.
Bruns, Merissa
He, Guixin
Lindquist, Ingrid E.
Sundararajan, Anitha
Schilkey, Faye D.
Mudge, Joann
Varela, Manuel F.
author_sort Mukherjee, Munmun
collection PubMed
description Pathogenic strains of Vibrio cholerae are responsible for endemic and pandemic outbreaks of the disease cholera. The complete toxigenic mechanisms underlying virulence in Vibrio strains are poorly understood. The hypothesis of this work was that virulent versus non-virulent strains of V. cholerae harbor distinctive genomic elements that encode virulence. The purpose of this study was to elucidate genomic differences between the O1 serotypes and non-O1 V. cholerae PS15, a non-toxigenic strain, in order to identify novel genes potentially responsible for virulence. In this study, we compared the whole genome of the non-O1 PS15 strain to the whole genomes of toxigenic serotypes at the phylogenetic level, and found that the PS15 genome was distantly related to those of toxigenic V. cholerae. Thus we focused on a detailed gene comparison between PS15 and the distantly related O1 V. cholerae N16961. Based on sequence alignment we tentatively assigned chromosome numbers 1 and 2 to elements within the genome of non-O1 V. cholerae PS15. Further, we found that PS15 and O1 V. cholerae N16961 shared 98% identity and 766 genes, but of the genes present in N16961 that were missing in the non-O1 V. cholerae PS15 genome, 56 were predicted to encode not only for virulence–related genes (colonization, antimicrobial resistance, and regulation of persister cells) but also genes involved in the metabolic biosynthesis of lipids, nucleosides and sulfur compounds. Additionally, we found 113 genes unique to PS15 that were predicted to encode other properties related to virulence, disease, defense, membrane transport, and DNA metabolism. Here, we identified distinctive and novel genomic elements between O1 and non-O1 V. cholerae genomes as potential virulence factors and, thus, targets for future therapeutics. Modulation of such novel targets may eventually enhance eradication efforts of endemic and pandemic disease cholera in afflicted nations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4338557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43385572015-02-24 Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae Mukherjee, Munmun Kakarla, Prathusha Kumar, Sanath Gonzalez, Esmeralda Floyd, Jared T. Inupakutika, Madhuri Devireddy, Amith Reddy Tirrell, Selena R. Bruns, Merissa He, Guixin Lindquist, Ingrid E. Sundararajan, Anitha Schilkey, Faye D. Mudge, Joann Varela, Manuel F. Genom Discov Article Pathogenic strains of Vibrio cholerae are responsible for endemic and pandemic outbreaks of the disease cholera. The complete toxigenic mechanisms underlying virulence in Vibrio strains are poorly understood. The hypothesis of this work was that virulent versus non-virulent strains of V. cholerae harbor distinctive genomic elements that encode virulence. The purpose of this study was to elucidate genomic differences between the O1 serotypes and non-O1 V. cholerae PS15, a non-toxigenic strain, in order to identify novel genes potentially responsible for virulence. In this study, we compared the whole genome of the non-O1 PS15 strain to the whole genomes of toxigenic serotypes at the phylogenetic level, and found that the PS15 genome was distantly related to those of toxigenic V. cholerae. Thus we focused on a detailed gene comparison between PS15 and the distantly related O1 V. cholerae N16961. Based on sequence alignment we tentatively assigned chromosome numbers 1 and 2 to elements within the genome of non-O1 V. cholerae PS15. Further, we found that PS15 and O1 V. cholerae N16961 shared 98% identity and 766 genes, but of the genes present in N16961 that were missing in the non-O1 V. cholerae PS15 genome, 56 were predicted to encode not only for virulence–related genes (colonization, antimicrobial resistance, and regulation of persister cells) but also genes involved in the metabolic biosynthesis of lipids, nucleosides and sulfur compounds. Additionally, we found 113 genes unique to PS15 that were predicted to encode other properties related to virulence, disease, defense, membrane transport, and DNA metabolism. Here, we identified distinctive and novel genomic elements between O1 and non-O1 V. cholerae genomes as potential virulence factors and, thus, targets for future therapeutics. Modulation of such novel targets may eventually enhance eradication efforts of endemic and pandemic disease cholera in afflicted nations. 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4338557/ /pubmed/25722857 http://dx.doi.org/10.7243/2052-7993-2-1 Text en © 2014 Varela et al; licensee Herbert Publications Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0). This permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Mukherjee, Munmun
Kakarla, Prathusha
Kumar, Sanath
Gonzalez, Esmeralda
Floyd, Jared T.
Inupakutika, Madhuri
Devireddy, Amith Reddy
Tirrell, Selena R.
Bruns, Merissa
He, Guixin
Lindquist, Ingrid E.
Sundararajan, Anitha
Schilkey, Faye D.
Mudge, Joann
Varela, Manuel F.
Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae
title Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae
title_full Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae
title_fullStr Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae
title_full_unstemmed Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae
title_short Comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-O1 versus toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae
title_sort comparative genome analysis of non-toxigenic non-o1 versus toxigenic o1 vibrio cholerae
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722857
http://dx.doi.org/10.7243/2052-7993-2-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mukherjeemunmun comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT kakarlaprathusha comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT kumarsanath comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT gonzalezesmeralda comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT floydjaredt comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT inupakutikamadhuri comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT devireddyamithreddy comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT tirrellselenar comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT brunsmerissa comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT heguixin comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT lindquistingride comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT sundararajananitha comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT schilkeyfayed comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT mudgejoann comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae
AT varelamanuelf comparativegenomeanalysisofnontoxigenicnono1versustoxigenico1vibriocholerae