Cargando…

Incidence of Defibrillator Shocks After Elective Generator Exchange Following Uneventful First Battery Life

BACKGROUND: A significant number of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) patients do not experience shocks after ICD implant. Elective generator exchange (GE) has been associated with increased risk of infection and ICD lead failure. There is a paucity of contemporary data reporting on shock...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merchant, Faisal M., Jones, Paul, Wehrenberg, Scott, Lloyd, Michael S., Saxon, Leslie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25385346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001289
_version_ 1782481262194196480
author Merchant, Faisal M.
Jones, Paul
Wehrenberg, Scott
Lloyd, Michael S.
Saxon, Leslie A.
author_facet Merchant, Faisal M.
Jones, Paul
Wehrenberg, Scott
Lloyd, Michael S.
Saxon, Leslie A.
author_sort Merchant, Faisal M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A significant number of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) patients do not experience shocks after ICD implant. Elective generator exchange (GE) has been associated with increased risk of infection and ICD lead failure. There is a paucity of contemporary data reporting on shock incidence with replacement devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing elective GE (n=24 203) who transmit data remotely via a remote monitoring system were analyzed to determine the incidence of ICD shocks after GE. A total of 16 230 patients (67%) did not experience a shock with the first ICD (group A), and 7973 (33%) received at least 1 shock (group B). Patients in group A were older (71.3 versus 68.8 years, P<0.001) and more often female (71% versus 77% male, P<0.001). Over an average follow‐up of 1.9±1.2 years after GE, the proportion of patients with shocks and risk of ICD shocks was lower for those who did not receive a shock during the first battery life (group A: 9.9% versus 27.7%, hazard ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.38, P<0.001). The cumulative rate of ICD shocks at 5 years after GE was 25.7% in group A and 51.1% in group B. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of ICD patients implanted across the United States, two thirds did not receive ICD shock therapy prior to GE. The occurrence of ICD shocks prior to GE is an important predictor of shocks after GE; however, even among those without shocks during first battery life, the incidence of shocks at 5 years following GE is >25%. These data should support informed decision making for patients and physicians at the time of ICD generator end of service.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4338723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43387232015-02-27 Incidence of Defibrillator Shocks After Elective Generator Exchange Following Uneventful First Battery Life Merchant, Faisal M. Jones, Paul Wehrenberg, Scott Lloyd, Michael S. Saxon, Leslie A. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: A significant number of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) patients do not experience shocks after ICD implant. Elective generator exchange (GE) has been associated with increased risk of infection and ICD lead failure. There is a paucity of contemporary data reporting on shock incidence with replacement devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing elective GE (n=24 203) who transmit data remotely via a remote monitoring system were analyzed to determine the incidence of ICD shocks after GE. A total of 16 230 patients (67%) did not experience a shock with the first ICD (group A), and 7973 (33%) received at least 1 shock (group B). Patients in group A were older (71.3 versus 68.8 years, P<0.001) and more often female (71% versus 77% male, P<0.001). Over an average follow‐up of 1.9±1.2 years after GE, the proportion of patients with shocks and risk of ICD shocks was lower for those who did not receive a shock during the first battery life (group A: 9.9% versus 27.7%, hazard ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.38, P<0.001). The cumulative rate of ICD shocks at 5 years after GE was 25.7% in group A and 51.1% in group B. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of ICD patients implanted across the United States, two thirds did not receive ICD shock therapy prior to GE. The occurrence of ICD shocks prior to GE is an important predictor of shocks after GE; however, even among those without shocks during first battery life, the incidence of shocks at 5 years following GE is >25%. These data should support informed decision making for patients and physicians at the time of ICD generator end of service. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2014-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4338723/ /pubmed/25385346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001289 Text en © 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Merchant, Faisal M.
Jones, Paul
Wehrenberg, Scott
Lloyd, Michael S.
Saxon, Leslie A.
Incidence of Defibrillator Shocks After Elective Generator Exchange Following Uneventful First Battery Life
title Incidence of Defibrillator Shocks After Elective Generator Exchange Following Uneventful First Battery Life
title_full Incidence of Defibrillator Shocks After Elective Generator Exchange Following Uneventful First Battery Life
title_fullStr Incidence of Defibrillator Shocks After Elective Generator Exchange Following Uneventful First Battery Life
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of Defibrillator Shocks After Elective Generator Exchange Following Uneventful First Battery Life
title_short Incidence of Defibrillator Shocks After Elective Generator Exchange Following Uneventful First Battery Life
title_sort incidence of defibrillator shocks after elective generator exchange following uneventful first battery life
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4338723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25385346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.114.001289
work_keys_str_mv AT merchantfaisalm incidenceofdefibrillatorshocksafterelectivegeneratorexchangefollowinguneventfulfirstbatterylife
AT jonespaul incidenceofdefibrillatorshocksafterelectivegeneratorexchangefollowinguneventfulfirstbatterylife
AT wehrenbergscott incidenceofdefibrillatorshocksafterelectivegeneratorexchangefollowinguneventfulfirstbatterylife
AT lloydmichaels incidenceofdefibrillatorshocksafterelectivegeneratorexchangefollowinguneventfulfirstbatterylife
AT saxonlesliea incidenceofdefibrillatorshocksafterelectivegeneratorexchangefollowinguneventfulfirstbatterylife