Cargando…
The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Healthy children achieve better educational outcomes which, in turn, are associated with improved health later in life. The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools (HPS) framework is a holistic approach to promoting health and educational attainment in school. The effectiven...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1360-y |
_version_ | 1782358833672224768 |
---|---|
author | Langford, Rebecca Bonell, Christopher Jones, Hayley Pouliou, Theodora Murphy, Simon Waters, Elizabeth Komro, Kelli Gibbs, Lisa Magnus, Daniel Campbell, Rona |
author_facet | Langford, Rebecca Bonell, Christopher Jones, Hayley Pouliou, Theodora Murphy, Simon Waters, Elizabeth Komro, Kelli Gibbs, Lisa Magnus, Daniel Campbell, Rona |
author_sort | Langford, Rebecca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthy children achieve better educational outcomes which, in turn, are associated with improved health later in life. The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools (HPS) framework is a holistic approach to promoting health and educational attainment in school. The effectiveness of this approach has not yet been rigorously reviewed. METHODS: We searched 20 health, education and social science databases, and trials registries and relevant websites in 2011 and 2013. We included cluster randomised controlled trials. Participants were children and young people aged four to 18 years attending schools/colleges. HPS interventions had to include the following three elements: input into the curriculum; changes to the school’s ethos or environment; and engagement with families and/or local communities. Two reviewers identified relevant trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We grouped studies according to the health topic(s) targeted. Where data permitted, we performed random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: We identified 67 eligible trials tackling a range of health issues. Few studies included any academic/attendance outcomes. We found positive average intervention effects for: body mass index (BMI), physical activity, physical fitness, fruit and vegetable intake, tobacco use, and being bullied. Intervention effects were generally small. On average across studies, we found little evidence of effectiveness for zBMI (BMI, standardized for age and gender), and no evidence for fat intake, alcohol use, drug use, mental health, violence and bullying others. It was not possible to meta-analyse data on other health outcomes due to lack of data. Methodological limitations were identified including reliance on self-reported data, lack of long-term follow-up, and high attrition rates. CONCLUSION: This Cochrane review has found the WHO HPS framework is effective at improving some aspects of student health. The effects are small but potentially important at a population level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4339015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43390152015-02-25 The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis Langford, Rebecca Bonell, Christopher Jones, Hayley Pouliou, Theodora Murphy, Simon Waters, Elizabeth Komro, Kelli Gibbs, Lisa Magnus, Daniel Campbell, Rona BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Healthy children achieve better educational outcomes which, in turn, are associated with improved health later in life. The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools (HPS) framework is a holistic approach to promoting health and educational attainment in school. The effectiveness of this approach has not yet been rigorously reviewed. METHODS: We searched 20 health, education and social science databases, and trials registries and relevant websites in 2011 and 2013. We included cluster randomised controlled trials. Participants were children and young people aged four to 18 years attending schools/colleges. HPS interventions had to include the following three elements: input into the curriculum; changes to the school’s ethos or environment; and engagement with families and/or local communities. Two reviewers identified relevant trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We grouped studies according to the health topic(s) targeted. Where data permitted, we performed random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: We identified 67 eligible trials tackling a range of health issues. Few studies included any academic/attendance outcomes. We found positive average intervention effects for: body mass index (BMI), physical activity, physical fitness, fruit and vegetable intake, tobacco use, and being bullied. Intervention effects were generally small. On average across studies, we found little evidence of effectiveness for zBMI (BMI, standardized for age and gender), and no evidence for fat intake, alcohol use, drug use, mental health, violence and bullying others. It was not possible to meta-analyse data on other health outcomes due to lack of data. Methodological limitations were identified including reliance on self-reported data, lack of long-term follow-up, and high attrition rates. CONCLUSION: This Cochrane review has found the WHO HPS framework is effective at improving some aspects of student health. The effects are small but potentially important at a population level. BioMed Central 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4339015/ /pubmed/25886385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1360-y Text en © Langford et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Langford, Rebecca Bonell, Christopher Jones, Hayley Pouliou, Theodora Murphy, Simon Waters, Elizabeth Komro, Kelli Gibbs, Lisa Magnus, Daniel Campbell, Rona The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The World Health Organization’s Health Promoting Schools framework: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | world health organization’s health promoting schools framework: a cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1360-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langfordrebecca theworldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bonellchristopher theworldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT joneshayley theworldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT poulioutheodora theworldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT murphysimon theworldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT waterselizabeth theworldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT komrokelli theworldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gibbslisa theworldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT magnusdaniel theworldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT campbellrona theworldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT langfordrebecca worldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bonellchristopher worldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT joneshayley worldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT poulioutheodora worldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT murphysimon worldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT waterselizabeth worldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT komrokelli worldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gibbslisa worldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT magnusdaniel worldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT campbellrona worldhealthorganizationshealthpromotingschoolsframeworkacochranesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |