Cargando…

Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD

[Purpose] We aimed to determine the effects of ventilation feedback using electrical stimulation on ventilation pattern during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and develop new rehabilitation methods. [Subjects] This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ito, Kenichi, Nozoe, Tatsuo, Okuda, Miyuki, Nonaka, Koji, Yamahara, Jun, Horie, Jun, Hayama, Yuka, Kawamura, Hirobumi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.325
_version_ 1782358840489017344
author Ito, Kenichi
Nozoe, Tatsuo
Okuda, Miyuki
Nonaka, Koji
Yamahara, Jun
Horie, Jun
Hayama, Yuka
Kawamura, Hirobumi
author_facet Ito, Kenichi
Nozoe, Tatsuo
Okuda, Miyuki
Nonaka, Koji
Yamahara, Jun
Horie, Jun
Hayama, Yuka
Kawamura, Hirobumi
author_sort Ito, Kenichi
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] We aimed to determine the effects of ventilation feedback using electrical stimulation on ventilation pattern during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and develop new rehabilitation methods. [Subjects] This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial included 24 patients with COPD. [Methods] Phasic electrical stimulation during expiration (PESE) or a placebo was given to all the cases. Minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume (TV), respiratory rate (RR), expiratory time (Te), total respiratory time (Ttot), dead-space gas volume to tidal gas volume (VD/VT), oxygen uptake (VO(2)), carbon dioxide output (VCO(2)), Borg scale (Borg), and percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) during rest and exercise were assessed. [Results] The placebo group showed no obvious change in ventilation measurements at rest or during exercise. However, in the PESE group, TV, Te, and Ttot significantly increased, while RR and VD/VT significantly decreased during exercise compared with the baseline measurements. Borg scores, SpO(2), VO(2), or VCO(2) did not differ significantly. [Conclusion] PESE improves the ventilation pattern during rest and exercise. Furthermore, PESE does not increase VO(2), which may indicate an increased workload. Biofeedback may contribute to PESE effects. Stimulation applied during expiration may evoke sensations increasing prolonged expiration awareness, facilitating prolongation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4339131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43391312015-02-27 Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD Ito, Kenichi Nozoe, Tatsuo Okuda, Miyuki Nonaka, Koji Yamahara, Jun Horie, Jun Hayama, Yuka Kawamura, Hirobumi J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] We aimed to determine the effects of ventilation feedback using electrical stimulation on ventilation pattern during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and develop new rehabilitation methods. [Subjects] This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial included 24 patients with COPD. [Methods] Phasic electrical stimulation during expiration (PESE) or a placebo was given to all the cases. Minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume (TV), respiratory rate (RR), expiratory time (Te), total respiratory time (Ttot), dead-space gas volume to tidal gas volume (VD/VT), oxygen uptake (VO(2)), carbon dioxide output (VCO(2)), Borg scale (Borg), and percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) during rest and exercise were assessed. [Results] The placebo group showed no obvious change in ventilation measurements at rest or during exercise. However, in the PESE group, TV, Te, and Ttot significantly increased, while RR and VD/VT significantly decreased during exercise compared with the baseline measurements. Borg scores, SpO(2), VO(2), or VCO(2) did not differ significantly. [Conclusion] PESE improves the ventilation pattern during rest and exercise. Furthermore, PESE does not increase VO(2), which may indicate an increased workload. Biofeedback may contribute to PESE effects. Stimulation applied during expiration may evoke sensations increasing prolonged expiration awareness, facilitating prolongation. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-02-17 2015-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4339131/ /pubmed/25729161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.325 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ito, Kenichi
Nozoe, Tatsuo
Okuda, Miyuki
Nonaka, Koji
Yamahara, Jun
Horie, Jun
Hayama, Yuka
Kawamura, Hirobumi
Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD
title Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD
title_full Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD
title_fullStr Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD
title_full_unstemmed Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD
title_short Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD
title_sort electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with copd
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729161
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.325
work_keys_str_mv AT itokenichi electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd
AT nozoetatsuo electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd
AT okudamiyuki electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd
AT nonakakoji electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd
AT yamaharajun electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd
AT horiejun electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd
AT hayamayuka electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd
AT kawamurahirobumi electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd