Cargando…
Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD
[Purpose] We aimed to determine the effects of ventilation feedback using electrical stimulation on ventilation pattern during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and develop new rehabilitation methods. [Subjects] This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.325 |
_version_ | 1782358840489017344 |
---|---|
author | Ito, Kenichi Nozoe, Tatsuo Okuda, Miyuki Nonaka, Koji Yamahara, Jun Horie, Jun Hayama, Yuka Kawamura, Hirobumi |
author_facet | Ito, Kenichi Nozoe, Tatsuo Okuda, Miyuki Nonaka, Koji Yamahara, Jun Horie, Jun Hayama, Yuka Kawamura, Hirobumi |
author_sort | Ito, Kenichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] We aimed to determine the effects of ventilation feedback using electrical stimulation on ventilation pattern during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and develop new rehabilitation methods. [Subjects] This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial included 24 patients with COPD. [Methods] Phasic electrical stimulation during expiration (PESE) or a placebo was given to all the cases. Minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume (TV), respiratory rate (RR), expiratory time (Te), total respiratory time (Ttot), dead-space gas volume to tidal gas volume (VD/VT), oxygen uptake (VO(2)), carbon dioxide output (VCO(2)), Borg scale (Borg), and percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) during rest and exercise were assessed. [Results] The placebo group showed no obvious change in ventilation measurements at rest or during exercise. However, in the PESE group, TV, Te, and Ttot significantly increased, while RR and VD/VT significantly decreased during exercise compared with the baseline measurements. Borg scores, SpO(2), VO(2), or VCO(2) did not differ significantly. [Conclusion] PESE improves the ventilation pattern during rest and exercise. Furthermore, PESE does not increase VO(2), which may indicate an increased workload. Biofeedback may contribute to PESE effects. Stimulation applied during expiration may evoke sensations increasing prolonged expiration awareness, facilitating prolongation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4339131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43391312015-02-27 Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD Ito, Kenichi Nozoe, Tatsuo Okuda, Miyuki Nonaka, Koji Yamahara, Jun Horie, Jun Hayama, Yuka Kawamura, Hirobumi J Phys Ther Sci Original Article [Purpose] We aimed to determine the effects of ventilation feedback using electrical stimulation on ventilation pattern during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and develop new rehabilitation methods. [Subjects] This randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial included 24 patients with COPD. [Methods] Phasic electrical stimulation during expiration (PESE) or a placebo was given to all the cases. Minute ventilation (VE), tidal volume (TV), respiratory rate (RR), expiratory time (Te), total respiratory time (Ttot), dead-space gas volume to tidal gas volume (VD/VT), oxygen uptake (VO(2)), carbon dioxide output (VCO(2)), Borg scale (Borg), and percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) during rest and exercise were assessed. [Results] The placebo group showed no obvious change in ventilation measurements at rest or during exercise. However, in the PESE group, TV, Te, and Ttot significantly increased, while RR and VD/VT significantly decreased during exercise compared with the baseline measurements. Borg scores, SpO(2), VO(2), or VCO(2) did not differ significantly. [Conclusion] PESE improves the ventilation pattern during rest and exercise. Furthermore, PESE does not increase VO(2), which may indicate an increased workload. Biofeedback may contribute to PESE effects. Stimulation applied during expiration may evoke sensations increasing prolonged expiration awareness, facilitating prolongation. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2015-02-17 2015-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4339131/ /pubmed/25729161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.325 Text en 2015©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ito, Kenichi Nozoe, Tatsuo Okuda, Miyuki Nonaka, Koji Yamahara, Jun Horie, Jun Hayama, Yuka Kawamura, Hirobumi Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern in patients with COPD |
title | Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern
in patients with COPD |
title_full | Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern
in patients with COPD |
title_fullStr | Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern
in patients with COPD |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern
in patients with COPD |
title_short | Electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern
in patients with COPD |
title_sort | electrically stimulated ventilation feedback improves the ventilation pattern
in patients with copd |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT itokenichi electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd AT nozoetatsuo electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd AT okudamiyuki electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd AT nonakakoji electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd AT yamaharajun electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd AT horiejun electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd AT hayamayuka electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd AT kawamurahirobumi electricallystimulatedventilationfeedbackimprovestheventilationpatterninpatientswithcopd |