Cargando…

Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?

BACKGROUND: Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive (13)C-urea b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida, Nuno, Donato, Maria Manuel, Romãozinho, José Manuel, Luxo, Cristina, Cardoso, Olga, Cipriano, Maria Augusta, Marinho, Carol, Fernandes, Alexandra, Calhau, Carlos, Sofia, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0245-y
_version_ 1782358865290985472
author Almeida, Nuno
Donato, Maria Manuel
Romãozinho, José Manuel
Luxo, Cristina
Cardoso, Olga
Cipriano, Maria Augusta
Marinho, Carol
Fernandes, Alexandra
Calhau, Carlos
Sofia, Carlos
author_facet Almeida, Nuno
Donato, Maria Manuel
Romãozinho, José Manuel
Luxo, Cristina
Cardoso, Olga
Cipriano, Maria Augusta
Marinho, Carol
Fernandes, Alexandra
Calhau, Carlos
Sofia, Carlos
author_sort Almeida, Nuno
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive (13)C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients with no previous H. pylori treatments (Group A, n = 103) received pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and clarithromycin (CLARI) 500 mg 12/12 h, for 14 days. Patients with previous failed treatments (Group B, n = 51) and no history of levofloxacin (LVX) consumption were prescribed pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and LVX 250 mg 12/12 h, for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by UBT 6–10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed by verbal and written questionnaires. Risk factors for eradication failure were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were Group A: 68.9% (95% CI: 59.4–77.1%) and 68.8% (95% CI: 58.9–77.2%); Group B: 52.9% (95% CI: 39.5–66%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 41.3–68.2%), with 43.7% of Group A and 31.4% of Group B reporting adverse events. Main risk factors for failure were H. pylori resistance to CLARI and LVX in Groups A and B, respectively. Another independent risk factor in Group A was history of frequent infections (OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.04–17.24). For patients with no H. pylori resistance to CLARI, a history of frequent infections (OR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.24–18.27) and active tobacco consumption (OR = 5.25; 95% CI 1.22–22.69) were also associated with eradication failure. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric first and second-line triple treatments have unacceptable eradication rates in the central region of Portugal and cannot be used, according to Maastricht recommendations. Even for cases with no H. pylori resistance to the used antibiotics, results were unacceptable and, at least for CLARI, are influenced by history of frequent infections and tobacco consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4339300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43393002015-02-26 Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country? Almeida, Nuno Donato, Maria Manuel Romãozinho, José Manuel Luxo, Cristina Cardoso, Olga Cipriano, Maria Augusta Marinho, Carol Fernandes, Alexandra Calhau, Carlos Sofia, Carlos BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Empiric triple treatments for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) are increasingly unsuccessful. We evaluated factors associated with failure of these treatments in the central region of Portugal. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study included 154 patients with positive (13)C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients with no previous H. pylori treatments (Group A, n = 103) received pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and clarithromycin (CLARI) 500 mg 12/12 h, for 14 days. Patients with previous failed treatments (Group B, n = 51) and no history of levofloxacin (LVX) consumption were prescribed pantoprazole 40 mg 2×/day, amoxicillin 1000 mg 12/12 h and LVX 250 mg 12/12 h, for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by UBT 6–10 weeks after treatment. Compliance and adverse events were assessed by verbal and written questionnaires. Risk factors for eradication failure were determined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were Group A: 68.9% (95% CI: 59.4–77.1%) and 68.8% (95% CI: 58.9–77.2%); Group B: 52.9% (95% CI: 39.5–66%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 41.3–68.2%), with 43.7% of Group A and 31.4% of Group B reporting adverse events. Main risk factors for failure were H. pylori resistance to CLARI and LVX in Groups A and B, respectively. Another independent risk factor in Group A was history of frequent infections (OR = 4.24; 95% CI 1.04–17.24). For patients with no H. pylori resistance to CLARI, a history of frequent infections (OR = 4.76; 95% CI 1.24–18.27) and active tobacco consumption (OR = 5.25; 95% CI 1.22–22.69) were also associated with eradication failure. CONCLUSIONS: Empiric first and second-line triple treatments have unacceptable eradication rates in the central region of Portugal and cannot be used, according to Maastricht recommendations. Even for cases with no H. pylori resistance to the used antibiotics, results were unacceptable and, at least for CLARI, are influenced by history of frequent infections and tobacco consumption. BioMed Central 2015-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4339300/ /pubmed/25886722 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0245-y Text en © Almeida et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Almeida, Nuno
Donato, Maria Manuel
Romãozinho, José Manuel
Luxo, Cristina
Cardoso, Olga
Cipriano, Maria Augusta
Marinho, Carol
Fernandes, Alexandra
Calhau, Carlos
Sofia, Carlos
Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title_full Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title_fullStr Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title_full_unstemmed Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title_short Beyond Maastricht IV: are standard empiric triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori still useful in a South-European country?
title_sort beyond maastricht iv: are standard empiric triple therapies for helicobacter pylori still useful in a south-european country?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25886722
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-015-0245-y
work_keys_str_mv AT almeidanuno beyondmaastrichtivarestandardempirictripletherapiesforhelicobacterpyloristillusefulinasoutheuropeancountry
AT donatomariamanuel beyondmaastrichtivarestandardempirictripletherapiesforhelicobacterpyloristillusefulinasoutheuropeancountry
AT romaozinhojosemanuel beyondmaastrichtivarestandardempirictripletherapiesforhelicobacterpyloristillusefulinasoutheuropeancountry
AT luxocristina beyondmaastrichtivarestandardempirictripletherapiesforhelicobacterpyloristillusefulinasoutheuropeancountry
AT cardosoolga beyondmaastrichtivarestandardempirictripletherapiesforhelicobacterpyloristillusefulinasoutheuropeancountry
AT ciprianomariaaugusta beyondmaastrichtivarestandardempirictripletherapiesforhelicobacterpyloristillusefulinasoutheuropeancountry
AT marinhocarol beyondmaastrichtivarestandardempirictripletherapiesforhelicobacterpyloristillusefulinasoutheuropeancountry
AT fernandesalexandra beyondmaastrichtivarestandardempirictripletherapiesforhelicobacterpyloristillusefulinasoutheuropeancountry
AT calhaucarlos beyondmaastrichtivarestandardempirictripletherapiesforhelicobacterpyloristillusefulinasoutheuropeancountry
AT sofiacarlos beyondmaastrichtivarestandardempirictripletherapiesforhelicobacterpyloristillusefulinasoutheuropeancountry