Cargando…

Study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an employer-led intervention to increase walking during the daily commute: the Travel to Work randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity increases the risk of many chronic diseases including coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes and some cancers. It is recommended that adults should undertake at least 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity throughout the week but many adults do not achie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Audrey, Suzanne, Cooper, Ashley R, Hollingworth, William, Metcalfe, Chris, Procter, Sunita, Davis, Adrian, Campbell, Rona, Gillison, Fiona, Rodgers, Sarah E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1464-4
_version_ 1782358876879847424
author Audrey, Suzanne
Cooper, Ashley R
Hollingworth, William
Metcalfe, Chris
Procter, Sunita
Davis, Adrian
Campbell, Rona
Gillison, Fiona
Rodgers, Sarah E
author_facet Audrey, Suzanne
Cooper, Ashley R
Hollingworth, William
Metcalfe, Chris
Procter, Sunita
Davis, Adrian
Campbell, Rona
Gillison, Fiona
Rodgers, Sarah E
author_sort Audrey, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity increases the risk of many chronic diseases including coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes and some cancers. It is recommended that adults should undertake at least 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity throughout the week but many adults do not achieve this. An opportunity for working adults to accumulate the recommended activity levels is through the daily commute. METHODS: Employees will be recruited from workplaces in south-west England and south Wales. In the intervention arm, workplace Walk-to-Work promoters will be recruited and trained. Participating employees will receive Walk-to-Work materials and support will be provided through four contacts from the promoters over 10 weeks. Workplaces in the control arm will continue with their usual practice. The intervention will be evaluated by a cluster randomized controlled trial including economic and process evaluations. The primary outcome is daily minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Secondary outcomes are: overall physical activity; sedentary time; modal shift away from private car use during the commute; and physical activity/MVPA during the commute. Accelerometers, GPS receivers and travel diaries will be used at baseline and one year follow-up. Questionnaires will be used at baseline, immediately post intervention, and one year follow-up. The process evaluation will examine the context, delivery and response to the intervention from the perspectives of employers, Walk-to-Work promoters and employees using questionnaires, descriptive statistics, fieldnotes and interviews. A cost-consequence study will include employer, employee and health service costs and outcomes. Time and consumables used in implementing the intervention will be measured. Journey time, household commuting costs and expenses will be recorded using travel diaries to estimate costs to employees. Presenteeism, absenteeism, employee wellbeing and health service use will be recorded. DISCUSSION: Compared with other forms of physical activity, walking is a popular, familiar and convenient, and the main option for increasing physical activity in sedentary populations. To our knowledge, this is the first full-scale randomised controlled trial to objectively measure (using accelerometers and GPS receivers) the effectiveness of a workplace intervention to promote walking during the commute to and from work. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN15009100 (10 December 2014).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4339476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43394762015-02-26 Study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an employer-led intervention to increase walking during the daily commute: the Travel to Work randomised controlled trial Audrey, Suzanne Cooper, Ashley R Hollingworth, William Metcalfe, Chris Procter, Sunita Davis, Adrian Campbell, Rona Gillison, Fiona Rodgers, Sarah E BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity increases the risk of many chronic diseases including coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes and some cancers. It is recommended that adults should undertake at least 150 minutes of moderate intensity physical activity throughout the week but many adults do not achieve this. An opportunity for working adults to accumulate the recommended activity levels is through the daily commute. METHODS: Employees will be recruited from workplaces in south-west England and south Wales. In the intervention arm, workplace Walk-to-Work promoters will be recruited and trained. Participating employees will receive Walk-to-Work materials and support will be provided through four contacts from the promoters over 10 weeks. Workplaces in the control arm will continue with their usual practice. The intervention will be evaluated by a cluster randomized controlled trial including economic and process evaluations. The primary outcome is daily minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Secondary outcomes are: overall physical activity; sedentary time; modal shift away from private car use during the commute; and physical activity/MVPA during the commute. Accelerometers, GPS receivers and travel diaries will be used at baseline and one year follow-up. Questionnaires will be used at baseline, immediately post intervention, and one year follow-up. The process evaluation will examine the context, delivery and response to the intervention from the perspectives of employers, Walk-to-Work promoters and employees using questionnaires, descriptive statistics, fieldnotes and interviews. A cost-consequence study will include employer, employee and health service costs and outcomes. Time and consumables used in implementing the intervention will be measured. Journey time, household commuting costs and expenses will be recorded using travel diaries to estimate costs to employees. Presenteeism, absenteeism, employee wellbeing and health service use will be recorded. DISCUSSION: Compared with other forms of physical activity, walking is a popular, familiar and convenient, and the main option for increasing physical activity in sedentary populations. To our knowledge, this is the first full-scale randomised controlled trial to objectively measure (using accelerometers and GPS receivers) the effectiveness of a workplace intervention to promote walking during the commute to and from work. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN15009100 (10 December 2014). BioMed Central 2015-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4339476/ /pubmed/25884986 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1464-4 Text en © Audrey et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Audrey, Suzanne
Cooper, Ashley R
Hollingworth, William
Metcalfe, Chris
Procter, Sunita
Davis, Adrian
Campbell, Rona
Gillison, Fiona
Rodgers, Sarah E
Study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an employer-led intervention to increase walking during the daily commute: the Travel to Work randomised controlled trial
title Study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an employer-led intervention to increase walking during the daily commute: the Travel to Work randomised controlled trial
title_full Study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an employer-led intervention to increase walking during the daily commute: the Travel to Work randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an employer-led intervention to increase walking during the daily commute: the Travel to Work randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an employer-led intervention to increase walking during the daily commute: the Travel to Work randomised controlled trial
title_short Study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an employer-led intervention to increase walking during the daily commute: the Travel to Work randomised controlled trial
title_sort study protocol: the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of an employer-led intervention to increase walking during the daily commute: the travel to work randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884986
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1464-4
work_keys_str_mv AT audreysuzanne studyprotocoltheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofanemployerledinterventiontoincreasewalkingduringthedailycommutethetraveltoworkrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT cooperashleyr studyprotocoltheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofanemployerledinterventiontoincreasewalkingduringthedailycommutethetraveltoworkrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hollingworthwilliam studyprotocoltheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofanemployerledinterventiontoincreasewalkingduringthedailycommutethetraveltoworkrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT metcalfechris studyprotocoltheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofanemployerledinterventiontoincreasewalkingduringthedailycommutethetraveltoworkrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT proctersunita studyprotocoltheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofanemployerledinterventiontoincreasewalkingduringthedailycommutethetraveltoworkrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT davisadrian studyprotocoltheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofanemployerledinterventiontoincreasewalkingduringthedailycommutethetraveltoworkrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT campbellrona studyprotocoltheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofanemployerledinterventiontoincreasewalkingduringthedailycommutethetraveltoworkrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT gillisonfiona studyprotocoltheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofanemployerledinterventiontoincreasewalkingduringthedailycommutethetraveltoworkrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT rodgerssarahe studyprotocoltheeffectivenessandcosteffectivenessofanemployerledinterventiontoincreasewalkingduringthedailycommutethetraveltoworkrandomisedcontrolledtrial