Cargando…

Increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf

Leaf hydraulic conductance (k (leaf)) is a central element in the regulation of leaf water balance but the properties of k (leaf) remain uncertain. Here, the evidence for the following two models for k (leaf) in well-hydrated plants is evaluated: (i) k (leaf) is constant or (ii) k (leaf) increases a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simonin, Kevin A., Burns, Emily, Choat, Brendan, Barbour, Margaret M., Dawson, Todd E., Franks, Peter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25547915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru481
Descripción
Sumario:Leaf hydraulic conductance (k (leaf)) is a central element in the regulation of leaf water balance but the properties of k (leaf) remain uncertain. Here, the evidence for the following two models for k (leaf) in well-hydrated plants is evaluated: (i) k (leaf) is constant or (ii) k (leaf) increases as transpiration rate (E) increases. The difference between stem and leaf water potential (ΔΨ(stem–leaf)), stomatal conductance (g (s)), k (leaf), and E over a diurnal cycle for three angiosperm and gymnosperm tree species growing in a common garden, and for Helianthus annuus plants grown under sub-ambient, ambient, and elevated atmospheric CO(2) concentration were evaluated. Results show that for well-watered plants k (leaf) is positively dependent on E. Here, this property is termed the dynamic conductance, k (leaf(E)), which incorporates the inherent k (leaf) at zero E, which is distinguished as the static conductance, k (leaf(0)). Growth under different CO(2) concentrations maintained the same relationship between k (leaf) and E, resulting in similar k (leaf(0)), while operating along different regions of the curve owing to the influence of CO(2) on g (s). The positive relationship between k (leaf) and E minimized variation in ΔΨ(stem–leaf). This enables leaves to minimize variation in Ψ(leaf) and maximize g (s) and CO(2) assimilation rate over the diurnal course of evaporative demand.