Cargando…

Increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf

Leaf hydraulic conductance (k (leaf)) is a central element in the regulation of leaf water balance but the properties of k (leaf) remain uncertain. Here, the evidence for the following two models for k (leaf) in well-hydrated plants is evaluated: (i) k (leaf) is constant or (ii) k (leaf) increases a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simonin, Kevin A., Burns, Emily, Choat, Brendan, Barbour, Margaret M., Dawson, Todd E., Franks, Peter J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25547915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru481
_version_ 1782358889119875072
author Simonin, Kevin A.
Burns, Emily
Choat, Brendan
Barbour, Margaret M.
Dawson, Todd E.
Franks, Peter J.
author_facet Simonin, Kevin A.
Burns, Emily
Choat, Brendan
Barbour, Margaret M.
Dawson, Todd E.
Franks, Peter J.
author_sort Simonin, Kevin A.
collection PubMed
description Leaf hydraulic conductance (k (leaf)) is a central element in the regulation of leaf water balance but the properties of k (leaf) remain uncertain. Here, the evidence for the following two models for k (leaf) in well-hydrated plants is evaluated: (i) k (leaf) is constant or (ii) k (leaf) increases as transpiration rate (E) increases. The difference between stem and leaf water potential (ΔΨ(stem–leaf)), stomatal conductance (g (s)), k (leaf), and E over a diurnal cycle for three angiosperm and gymnosperm tree species growing in a common garden, and for Helianthus annuus plants grown under sub-ambient, ambient, and elevated atmospheric CO(2) concentration were evaluated. Results show that for well-watered plants k (leaf) is positively dependent on E. Here, this property is termed the dynamic conductance, k (leaf(E)), which incorporates the inherent k (leaf) at zero E, which is distinguished as the static conductance, k (leaf(0)). Growth under different CO(2) concentrations maintained the same relationship between k (leaf) and E, resulting in similar k (leaf(0)), while operating along different regions of the curve owing to the influence of CO(2) on g (s). The positive relationship between k (leaf) and E minimized variation in ΔΨ(stem–leaf). This enables leaves to minimize variation in Ψ(leaf) and maximize g (s) and CO(2) assimilation rate over the diurnal course of evaporative demand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4339593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43395932015-06-26 Increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf Simonin, Kevin A. Burns, Emily Choat, Brendan Barbour, Margaret M. Dawson, Todd E. Franks, Peter J. J Exp Bot Research Paper Leaf hydraulic conductance (k (leaf)) is a central element in the regulation of leaf water balance but the properties of k (leaf) remain uncertain. Here, the evidence for the following two models for k (leaf) in well-hydrated plants is evaluated: (i) k (leaf) is constant or (ii) k (leaf) increases as transpiration rate (E) increases. The difference between stem and leaf water potential (ΔΨ(stem–leaf)), stomatal conductance (g (s)), k (leaf), and E over a diurnal cycle for three angiosperm and gymnosperm tree species growing in a common garden, and for Helianthus annuus plants grown under sub-ambient, ambient, and elevated atmospheric CO(2) concentration were evaluated. Results show that for well-watered plants k (leaf) is positively dependent on E. Here, this property is termed the dynamic conductance, k (leaf(E)), which incorporates the inherent k (leaf) at zero E, which is distinguished as the static conductance, k (leaf(0)). Growth under different CO(2) concentrations maintained the same relationship between k (leaf) and E, resulting in similar k (leaf(0)), while operating along different regions of the curve owing to the influence of CO(2) on g (s). The positive relationship between k (leaf) and E minimized variation in ΔΨ(stem–leaf). This enables leaves to minimize variation in Ψ(leaf) and maximize g (s) and CO(2) assimilation rate over the diurnal course of evaporative demand. Oxford University Press 2015-03 2014-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4339593/ /pubmed/25547915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru481 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Simonin, Kevin A.
Burns, Emily
Choat, Brendan
Barbour, Margaret M.
Dawson, Todd E.
Franks, Peter J.
Increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf
title Increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf
title_full Increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf
title_fullStr Increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf
title_full_unstemmed Increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf
title_short Increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf
title_sort increasing leaf hydraulic conductance with transpiration rate minimizes the water potential drawdown from stem to leaf
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25547915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru481
work_keys_str_mv AT simoninkevina increasingleafhydraulicconductancewithtranspirationrateminimizesthewaterpotentialdrawdownfromstemtoleaf
AT burnsemily increasingleafhydraulicconductancewithtranspirationrateminimizesthewaterpotentialdrawdownfromstemtoleaf
AT choatbrendan increasingleafhydraulicconductancewithtranspirationrateminimizesthewaterpotentialdrawdownfromstemtoleaf
AT barbourmargaretm increasingleafhydraulicconductancewithtranspirationrateminimizesthewaterpotentialdrawdownfromstemtoleaf
AT dawsontodde increasingleafhydraulicconductancewithtranspirationrateminimizesthewaterpotentialdrawdownfromstemtoleaf
AT frankspeterj increasingleafhydraulicconductancewithtranspirationrateminimizesthewaterpotentialdrawdownfromstemtoleaf