Cargando…
Improving the estimation of the burden of risk factors: an illustrative comparison of methods to measure smoking-attributable mortality
BACKGROUND: Prevention efforts are informed by the numbers of deaths or cases of disease caused by specific risk factors, but these are challenging to estimate in a population. Fortunately, an increasing number of jurisdictions have increasingly rich individual-level, population-based data linking e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-015-0039-z |
_version_ | 1782358894222245888 |
---|---|
author | Tanuseputro, Peter Perez, Richard Rosella, Laura Wilson, Kumanan Bennett, Carol Tuna, Meltem Hennessy, Deirdre Manson, Heather Manuel, Douglas |
author_facet | Tanuseputro, Peter Perez, Richard Rosella, Laura Wilson, Kumanan Bennett, Carol Tuna, Meltem Hennessy, Deirdre Manson, Heather Manuel, Douglas |
author_sort | Tanuseputro, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prevention efforts are informed by the numbers of deaths or cases of disease caused by specific risk factors, but these are challenging to estimate in a population. Fortunately, an increasing number of jurisdictions have increasingly rich individual-level, population-based data linking exposures and outcomes. These linkages enable multivariable approaches to risk assessment. We demonstrate how this approach can estimate the population burden of risk factors and illustrate its advantages over often-used population-attributable fraction methods. METHODS: We obtained risk factor information for 78,597 individuals from a series of population-based health surveys. Each respondent was linked to death registry (568,997 person-years of follow-up, 6,399 deaths).Two methods were used to obtain population-attributable fractions. First, the mortality rate difference between the entire population and the population of non-smokers was divided by the total mortality rate. Second, often-used attributable fraction formulas were used to combine summary measures of smoking prevalence with relative risks of death for select diseases. The respective fractions were then multiplied to summary measures of mortality to obtain smoking-attributable mortality. Alternatively, for our multivariable approach, we created algorithms for risk of death, predicted by health behaviors and various covariates (age, sex, socioeconomic position, etc.). The burden of smoking was determined by comparing the predicted mortality of the current population with that of a counterfactual population where smoking is eliminated. RESULTS: Our multivariable algorithms accurately predicted an individual’s risk of death based on their health behaviors and other variables in the models. These algorithms estimated that 23.7% of all deaths can be attributed to smoking in Ontario. This is higher than the 20.0% estimated using population-attributable risk methods that considered only select diseases and lower than the 35.4% estimated from population-attributable risk methods that examine the excess burden of all deaths due to smoking. CONCLUSIONS: The multivariable algorithms presented have several advantages, including: controlling for confounders, accounting for complexities in the relationship between multiple exposures and covariates, using consistent definitions of exposure, and using specific measures of risk derived internally from the study population. We propose the wider use of multivariable risk assessment approach as an alternative to population-attributable fraction methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4339639 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43396392015-02-26 Improving the estimation of the burden of risk factors: an illustrative comparison of methods to measure smoking-attributable mortality Tanuseputro, Peter Perez, Richard Rosella, Laura Wilson, Kumanan Bennett, Carol Tuna, Meltem Hennessy, Deirdre Manson, Heather Manuel, Douglas Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: Prevention efforts are informed by the numbers of deaths or cases of disease caused by specific risk factors, but these are challenging to estimate in a population. Fortunately, an increasing number of jurisdictions have increasingly rich individual-level, population-based data linking exposures and outcomes. These linkages enable multivariable approaches to risk assessment. We demonstrate how this approach can estimate the population burden of risk factors and illustrate its advantages over often-used population-attributable fraction methods. METHODS: We obtained risk factor information for 78,597 individuals from a series of population-based health surveys. Each respondent was linked to death registry (568,997 person-years of follow-up, 6,399 deaths).Two methods were used to obtain population-attributable fractions. First, the mortality rate difference between the entire population and the population of non-smokers was divided by the total mortality rate. Second, often-used attributable fraction formulas were used to combine summary measures of smoking prevalence with relative risks of death for select diseases. The respective fractions were then multiplied to summary measures of mortality to obtain smoking-attributable mortality. Alternatively, for our multivariable approach, we created algorithms for risk of death, predicted by health behaviors and various covariates (age, sex, socioeconomic position, etc.). The burden of smoking was determined by comparing the predicted mortality of the current population with that of a counterfactual population where smoking is eliminated. RESULTS: Our multivariable algorithms accurately predicted an individual’s risk of death based on their health behaviors and other variables in the models. These algorithms estimated that 23.7% of all deaths can be attributed to smoking in Ontario. This is higher than the 20.0% estimated using population-attributable risk methods that considered only select diseases and lower than the 35.4% estimated from population-attributable risk methods that examine the excess burden of all deaths due to smoking. CONCLUSIONS: The multivariable algorithms presented have several advantages, including: controlling for confounders, accounting for complexities in the relationship between multiple exposures and covariates, using consistent definitions of exposure, and using specific measures of risk derived internally from the study population. We propose the wider use of multivariable risk assessment approach as an alternative to population-attributable fraction methods. BioMed Central 2015-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4339639/ /pubmed/25717287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-015-0039-z Text en © Tanuseputro et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Tanuseputro, Peter Perez, Richard Rosella, Laura Wilson, Kumanan Bennett, Carol Tuna, Meltem Hennessy, Deirdre Manson, Heather Manuel, Douglas Improving the estimation of the burden of risk factors: an illustrative comparison of methods to measure smoking-attributable mortality |
title | Improving the estimation of the burden of risk factors: an illustrative comparison of methods to measure smoking-attributable mortality |
title_full | Improving the estimation of the burden of risk factors: an illustrative comparison of methods to measure smoking-attributable mortality |
title_fullStr | Improving the estimation of the burden of risk factors: an illustrative comparison of methods to measure smoking-attributable mortality |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving the estimation of the burden of risk factors: an illustrative comparison of methods to measure smoking-attributable mortality |
title_short | Improving the estimation of the burden of risk factors: an illustrative comparison of methods to measure smoking-attributable mortality |
title_sort | improving the estimation of the burden of risk factors: an illustrative comparison of methods to measure smoking-attributable mortality |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339639/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-015-0039-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanuseputropeter improvingtheestimationoftheburdenofriskfactorsanillustrativecomparisonofmethodstomeasuresmokingattributablemortality AT perezrichard improvingtheestimationoftheburdenofriskfactorsanillustrativecomparisonofmethodstomeasuresmokingattributablemortality AT rosellalaura improvingtheestimationoftheburdenofriskfactorsanillustrativecomparisonofmethodstomeasuresmokingattributablemortality AT wilsonkumanan improvingtheestimationoftheburdenofriskfactorsanillustrativecomparisonofmethodstomeasuresmokingattributablemortality AT bennettcarol improvingtheestimationoftheburdenofriskfactorsanillustrativecomparisonofmethodstomeasuresmokingattributablemortality AT tunameltem improvingtheestimationoftheburdenofriskfactorsanillustrativecomparisonofmethodstomeasuresmokingattributablemortality AT hennessydeirdre improvingtheestimationoftheburdenofriskfactorsanillustrativecomparisonofmethodstomeasuresmokingattributablemortality AT mansonheather improvingtheestimationoftheburdenofriskfactorsanillustrativecomparisonofmethodstomeasuresmokingattributablemortality AT manueldouglas improvingtheestimationoftheburdenofriskfactorsanillustrativecomparisonofmethodstomeasuresmokingattributablemortality |