Cargando…

Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Sinonasal cancer (SNC) has been related to occupational exposures, but the relative risk associated to specific jobs and/or carcinogen exposures other than wood and leather dust is generally based on small or inadequate sample sizes and the range of observed estimates is large. This pape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binazzi, Alessandra, Ferrante, Pierpaolo, Marinaccio, Alessandro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1042-2
_version_ 1782358895365193728
author Binazzi, Alessandra
Ferrante, Pierpaolo
Marinaccio, Alessandro
author_facet Binazzi, Alessandra
Ferrante, Pierpaolo
Marinaccio, Alessandro
author_sort Binazzi, Alessandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sinonasal cancer (SNC) has been related to occupational exposures, but the relative risk associated to specific jobs and/or carcinogen exposures other than wood and leather dust is generally based on small or inadequate sample sizes and the range of observed estimates is large. This paper is aimed at investigating such relationship through a systematic review of the literature followed by a meta-analysis of studies meeting specific inclusion criteria. METHODS: Systematic search was made with PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus engines using related keywords. Occupational exposures include wood and leather dust, formaldehyde, nickel and chromium compounds, textile industry, farming and construction. Meta-analysis of published studies after 1985 with a case-control or cohort design was performed, firstly using the fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Q statistical test and quantified by the I(2) index. When the heterogeneity hypothesis appeared relevant, the random-effect model was chosen. Sources of heterogeneity were explored using subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Out of 63 reviewed articles, 28 (11 cohort, 17 case-control) were used in the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity among studies was observed and random-effects models were used. Exposure to wood dust results associated with SNC (RR(pooled) = 5.91, 95% CI: 4.31-8.11 for the case-control studies and 1.61, 95% CI: 1.10-2.37 for the cohort studies), as well as to leather dust (11.89, 95% CI: 7.69-18.36). The strongest associations are with adenocarcinomas (29.43, 95% CI: 16.46-52.61 and 35.26, 95% CI: 20.62-60.28 respectively). An increased risk of SNC for exposures to formaldehyde (1.68, 95% CI: 1.37-2.06 for the case control and 1.09, 95% CI: 0.66-1.79 for the cohort studies), textile industry (2.03, 95% CI: 1.47-2.8), construction (1.62, 95% CI: 1.11-2.36) and nickel and chromium compounds (18.0, 95% CI: 14.55-22.27) was found. Subset analyses identified several sources of heterogeneity and an exposure-response relationship was suggested for wood dust (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: By confirming the strength of association between occupational exposure to causal carcinogens and SNC risk, our results may provide indications to the occupational etiology of SNC (not only wood and leather dusts). Future studies could be focused on specific occupational groups to confirm causative agents and to define appropriate preventive measures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1042-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4339645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43396452015-02-26 Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Binazzi, Alessandra Ferrante, Pierpaolo Marinaccio, Alessandro BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Sinonasal cancer (SNC) has been related to occupational exposures, but the relative risk associated to specific jobs and/or carcinogen exposures other than wood and leather dust is generally based on small or inadequate sample sizes and the range of observed estimates is large. This paper is aimed at investigating such relationship through a systematic review of the literature followed by a meta-analysis of studies meeting specific inclusion criteria. METHODS: Systematic search was made with PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus engines using related keywords. Occupational exposures include wood and leather dust, formaldehyde, nickel and chromium compounds, textile industry, farming and construction. Meta-analysis of published studies after 1985 with a case-control or cohort design was performed, firstly using the fixed-effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Q statistical test and quantified by the I(2) index. When the heterogeneity hypothesis appeared relevant, the random-effect model was chosen. Sources of heterogeneity were explored using subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Out of 63 reviewed articles, 28 (11 cohort, 17 case-control) were used in the meta-analysis. Heterogeneity among studies was observed and random-effects models were used. Exposure to wood dust results associated with SNC (RR(pooled) = 5.91, 95% CI: 4.31-8.11 for the case-control studies and 1.61, 95% CI: 1.10-2.37 for the cohort studies), as well as to leather dust (11.89, 95% CI: 7.69-18.36). The strongest associations are with adenocarcinomas (29.43, 95% CI: 16.46-52.61 and 35.26, 95% CI: 20.62-60.28 respectively). An increased risk of SNC for exposures to formaldehyde (1.68, 95% CI: 1.37-2.06 for the case control and 1.09, 95% CI: 0.66-1.79 for the cohort studies), textile industry (2.03, 95% CI: 1.47-2.8), construction (1.62, 95% CI: 1.11-2.36) and nickel and chromium compounds (18.0, 95% CI: 14.55-22.27) was found. Subset analyses identified several sources of heterogeneity and an exposure-response relationship was suggested for wood dust (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: By confirming the strength of association between occupational exposure to causal carcinogens and SNC risk, our results may provide indications to the occupational etiology of SNC (not only wood and leather dusts). Future studies could be focused on specific occupational groups to confirm causative agents and to define appropriate preventive measures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1042-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4339645/ /pubmed/25885319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1042-2 Text en © Binazzi et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Binazzi, Alessandra
Ferrante, Pierpaolo
Marinaccio, Alessandro
Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25885319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1042-2
work_keys_str_mv AT binazzialessandra occupationalexposureandsinonasalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ferrantepierpaolo occupationalexposureandsinonasalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marinaccioalessandro occupationalexposureandsinonasalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis