Cargando…

Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy

In the context of head and neck cancer (HNC) adaptive radiation therapy (ART), the two purposes of the study were to compare the performance of multiple deformable image registration (DIR) methods and to quantify their impact for dose accumulation, in healthy structures. Fifteen HNC patients had a p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rigaud, Bastien, Simon, Antoine, Castelli, Joël, Gobeli, Maxime, Ospina Arango, Juan-David, Cazoulat, Guillaume, Henry, Olivier, Haigron, Pascal, De Crevoisier, Renaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25759821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/726268
_version_ 1782358903138287616
author Rigaud, Bastien
Simon, Antoine
Castelli, Joël
Gobeli, Maxime
Ospina Arango, Juan-David
Cazoulat, Guillaume
Henry, Olivier
Haigron, Pascal
De Crevoisier, Renaud
author_facet Rigaud, Bastien
Simon, Antoine
Castelli, Joël
Gobeli, Maxime
Ospina Arango, Juan-David
Cazoulat, Guillaume
Henry, Olivier
Haigron, Pascal
De Crevoisier, Renaud
author_sort Rigaud, Bastien
collection PubMed
description In the context of head and neck cancer (HNC) adaptive radiation therapy (ART), the two purposes of the study were to compare the performance of multiple deformable image registration (DIR) methods and to quantify their impact for dose accumulation, in healthy structures. Fifteen HNC patients had a planning computed tomography (CT0) and weekly CTs during the 7 weeks of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Ten DIR approaches using different registration methods (demons or B-spline free form deformation (FFD)), preprocessing, and similarity metrics were tested. Two observers identified 14 landmarks (LM) on each CT-scan to compute LM registration error. The cumulated doses estimated by each method were compared. The two most effective DIR methods were the demons and the FFD, with both the mutual information (MI) metric and the filtered CTs. The corresponding LM registration accuracy (precision) was 2.44 mm (1.30 mm) and 2.54 mm (1.33 mm), respectively. The corresponding LM estimated cumulated dose accuracy (dose precision) was 0.85 Gy (0.93 Gy) and 0.88 Gy (0.95 Gy), respectively. The mean uncertainty (difference between maximal and minimal dose considering all the 10 methods) to estimate the cumulated mean dose to the parotid gland (PG) was 4.03 Gy (SD = 2.27 Gy, range: 1.06–8.91 Gy).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4339705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43397052015-03-10 Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy Rigaud, Bastien Simon, Antoine Castelli, Joël Gobeli, Maxime Ospina Arango, Juan-David Cazoulat, Guillaume Henry, Olivier Haigron, Pascal De Crevoisier, Renaud Biomed Res Int Research Article In the context of head and neck cancer (HNC) adaptive radiation therapy (ART), the two purposes of the study were to compare the performance of multiple deformable image registration (DIR) methods and to quantify their impact for dose accumulation, in healthy structures. Fifteen HNC patients had a planning computed tomography (CT0) and weekly CTs during the 7 weeks of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Ten DIR approaches using different registration methods (demons or B-spline free form deformation (FFD)), preprocessing, and similarity metrics were tested. Two observers identified 14 landmarks (LM) on each CT-scan to compute LM registration error. The cumulated doses estimated by each method were compared. The two most effective DIR methods were the demons and the FFD, with both the mutual information (MI) metric and the filtered CTs. The corresponding LM registration accuracy (precision) was 2.44 mm (1.30 mm) and 2.54 mm (1.33 mm), respectively. The corresponding LM estimated cumulated dose accuracy (dose precision) was 0.85 Gy (0.93 Gy) and 0.88 Gy (0.95 Gy), respectively. The mean uncertainty (difference between maximal and minimal dose considering all the 10 methods) to estimate the cumulated mean dose to the parotid gland (PG) was 4.03 Gy (SD = 2.27 Gy, range: 1.06–8.91 Gy). Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4339705/ /pubmed/25759821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/726268 Text en Copyright © 2015 Bastien Rigaud et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rigaud, Bastien
Simon, Antoine
Castelli, Joël
Gobeli, Maxime
Ospina Arango, Juan-David
Cazoulat, Guillaume
Henry, Olivier
Haigron, Pascal
De Crevoisier, Renaud
Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy
title Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy
title_full Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy
title_fullStr Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy
title_short Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy
title_sort evaluation of deformable image registration methods for dose monitoring in head and neck radiotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25759821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/726268
work_keys_str_mv AT rigaudbastien evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT simonantoine evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT castellijoel evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT gobelimaxime evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT ospinaarangojuandavid evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT cazoulatguillaume evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT henryolivier evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT haigronpascal evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy
AT decrevoisierrenaud evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy