Cargando…
Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy
In the context of head and neck cancer (HNC) adaptive radiation therapy (ART), the two purposes of the study were to compare the performance of multiple deformable image registration (DIR) methods and to quantify their impact for dose accumulation, in healthy structures. Fifteen HNC patients had a p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25759821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/726268 |
_version_ | 1782358903138287616 |
---|---|
author | Rigaud, Bastien Simon, Antoine Castelli, Joël Gobeli, Maxime Ospina Arango, Juan-David Cazoulat, Guillaume Henry, Olivier Haigron, Pascal De Crevoisier, Renaud |
author_facet | Rigaud, Bastien Simon, Antoine Castelli, Joël Gobeli, Maxime Ospina Arango, Juan-David Cazoulat, Guillaume Henry, Olivier Haigron, Pascal De Crevoisier, Renaud |
author_sort | Rigaud, Bastien |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the context of head and neck cancer (HNC) adaptive radiation therapy (ART), the two purposes of the study were to compare the performance of multiple deformable image registration (DIR) methods and to quantify their impact for dose accumulation, in healthy structures. Fifteen HNC patients had a planning computed tomography (CT0) and weekly CTs during the 7 weeks of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Ten DIR approaches using different registration methods (demons or B-spline free form deformation (FFD)), preprocessing, and similarity metrics were tested. Two observers identified 14 landmarks (LM) on each CT-scan to compute LM registration error. The cumulated doses estimated by each method were compared. The two most effective DIR methods were the demons and the FFD, with both the mutual information (MI) metric and the filtered CTs. The corresponding LM registration accuracy (precision) was 2.44 mm (1.30 mm) and 2.54 mm (1.33 mm), respectively. The corresponding LM estimated cumulated dose accuracy (dose precision) was 0.85 Gy (0.93 Gy) and 0.88 Gy (0.95 Gy), respectively. The mean uncertainty (difference between maximal and minimal dose considering all the 10 methods) to estimate the cumulated mean dose to the parotid gland (PG) was 4.03 Gy (SD = 2.27 Gy, range: 1.06–8.91 Gy). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4339705 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43397052015-03-10 Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy Rigaud, Bastien Simon, Antoine Castelli, Joël Gobeli, Maxime Ospina Arango, Juan-David Cazoulat, Guillaume Henry, Olivier Haigron, Pascal De Crevoisier, Renaud Biomed Res Int Research Article In the context of head and neck cancer (HNC) adaptive radiation therapy (ART), the two purposes of the study were to compare the performance of multiple deformable image registration (DIR) methods and to quantify their impact for dose accumulation, in healthy structures. Fifteen HNC patients had a planning computed tomography (CT0) and weekly CTs during the 7 weeks of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Ten DIR approaches using different registration methods (demons or B-spline free form deformation (FFD)), preprocessing, and similarity metrics were tested. Two observers identified 14 landmarks (LM) on each CT-scan to compute LM registration error. The cumulated doses estimated by each method were compared. The two most effective DIR methods were the demons and the FFD, with both the mutual information (MI) metric and the filtered CTs. The corresponding LM registration accuracy (precision) was 2.44 mm (1.30 mm) and 2.54 mm (1.33 mm), respectively. The corresponding LM estimated cumulated dose accuracy (dose precision) was 0.85 Gy (0.93 Gy) and 0.88 Gy (0.95 Gy), respectively. The mean uncertainty (difference between maximal and minimal dose considering all the 10 methods) to estimate the cumulated mean dose to the parotid gland (PG) was 4.03 Gy (SD = 2.27 Gy, range: 1.06–8.91 Gy). Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4339705/ /pubmed/25759821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/726268 Text en Copyright © 2015 Bastien Rigaud et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rigaud, Bastien Simon, Antoine Castelli, Joël Gobeli, Maxime Ospina Arango, Juan-David Cazoulat, Guillaume Henry, Olivier Haigron, Pascal De Crevoisier, Renaud Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy |
title | Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy |
title_full | Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy |
title_short | Evaluation of Deformable Image Registration Methods for Dose Monitoring in Head and Neck Radiotherapy |
title_sort | evaluation of deformable image registration methods for dose monitoring in head and neck radiotherapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339705/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25759821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/726268 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rigaudbastien evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy AT simonantoine evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy AT castellijoel evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy AT gobelimaxime evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy AT ospinaarangojuandavid evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy AT cazoulatguillaume evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy AT henryolivier evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy AT haigronpascal evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy AT decrevoisierrenaud evaluationofdeformableimageregistrationmethodsfordosemonitoringinheadandneckradiotherapy |