Cargando…
Blood donor notification and counseling: Our experience from a tertiary care hospital in India
AIMS: To evaluate the response rate of transfusion-transmissible infection (TTI)-reactive donors after notification of their abnormal test results for the year 2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is an observational descriptive study performed in our department over a period of 1 year. We evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722567 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6247.150941 |
_version_ | 1782358942500782080 |
---|---|
author | Kotwal, Urvershi Doda, Veena Arora, Satyam Bhardwaj, Swati |
author_facet | Kotwal, Urvershi Doda, Veena Arora, Satyam Bhardwaj, Swati |
author_sort | Kotwal, Urvershi |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To evaluate the response rate of transfusion-transmissible infection (TTI)-reactive donors after notification of their abnormal test results for the year 2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is an observational descriptive study performed in our department over a period of 1 year. We evaluated the response rate of TTI-reactive donors after notification of their abnormal test results over 1 year as per the existing strategy (three telephonic and two postal communications). RESULTS: During the study period, among the annual donation of 15,322 units, 464 blood donors were found to be seroreactive. Of these 464 seroreactive cases, 47 were HIV positive, 284 were reactive for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), 49 were Hepatitis C (HCV) positive and 84 were VDRL reactive. The TTI-reactive donors (464) for various markers were contacted: 229 (49.4%) telephonically and the remaining 235 (50.6%) not contacted on phone were informed by post. Of the 229 contacted donors, the response rate was 98.2% as only 225 donors reported (221 on the first, three on second and one on the third call) for one to one counseling. The remaining four non-responders were - one HIV and three HBsAg reactive. The remaining 235 (50.6%) reactive donors did not respond to any communication. CONCLUSION: Donor notification and post-donation counseling are an essential aspect of the blood bank that entails provision of information on serological status, assess the impact of test results on the donor and finally referral for medical care. As in our data only 49.4% of the blood donors could be contacted successfully, incomplete demographic details was the major limiting factor in communicating with rest. Of the 229 contacted donors, the response rate was 98.2%. A large majority (94.75%) of the notified donors in our study contacted their health care provider when given clear instructions to do so. These results are encouraging because they indicate that a major element of the notification message is acted upon when it is worded clearly. The very high response rate of the contacted donors ensured their concern for knowing their test result status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4339925 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43399252015-02-26 Blood donor notification and counseling: Our experience from a tertiary care hospital in India Kotwal, Urvershi Doda, Veena Arora, Satyam Bhardwaj, Swati Asian J Transfus Sci Original Article AIMS: To evaluate the response rate of transfusion-transmissible infection (TTI)-reactive donors after notification of their abnormal test results for the year 2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is an observational descriptive study performed in our department over a period of 1 year. We evaluated the response rate of TTI-reactive donors after notification of their abnormal test results over 1 year as per the existing strategy (three telephonic and two postal communications). RESULTS: During the study period, among the annual donation of 15,322 units, 464 blood donors were found to be seroreactive. Of these 464 seroreactive cases, 47 were HIV positive, 284 were reactive for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), 49 were Hepatitis C (HCV) positive and 84 were VDRL reactive. The TTI-reactive donors (464) for various markers were contacted: 229 (49.4%) telephonically and the remaining 235 (50.6%) not contacted on phone were informed by post. Of the 229 contacted donors, the response rate was 98.2% as only 225 donors reported (221 on the first, three on second and one on the third call) for one to one counseling. The remaining four non-responders were - one HIV and three HBsAg reactive. The remaining 235 (50.6%) reactive donors did not respond to any communication. CONCLUSION: Donor notification and post-donation counseling are an essential aspect of the blood bank that entails provision of information on serological status, assess the impact of test results on the donor and finally referral for medical care. As in our data only 49.4% of the blood donors could be contacted successfully, incomplete demographic details was the major limiting factor in communicating with rest. Of the 229 contacted donors, the response rate was 98.2%. A large majority (94.75%) of the notified donors in our study contacted their health care provider when given clear instructions to do so. These results are encouraging because they indicate that a major element of the notification message is acted upon when it is worded clearly. The very high response rate of the contacted donors ensured their concern for knowing their test result status. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4339925/ /pubmed/25722567 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6247.150941 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Transfusion Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kotwal, Urvershi Doda, Veena Arora, Satyam Bhardwaj, Swati Blood donor notification and counseling: Our experience from a tertiary care hospital in India |
title | Blood donor notification and counseling: Our experience from a tertiary care hospital in India |
title_full | Blood donor notification and counseling: Our experience from a tertiary care hospital in India |
title_fullStr | Blood donor notification and counseling: Our experience from a tertiary care hospital in India |
title_full_unstemmed | Blood donor notification and counseling: Our experience from a tertiary care hospital in India |
title_short | Blood donor notification and counseling: Our experience from a tertiary care hospital in India |
title_sort | blood donor notification and counseling: our experience from a tertiary care hospital in india |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4339925/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722567 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-6247.150941 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kotwalurvershi blooddonornotificationandcounselingourexperiencefromatertiarycarehospitalinindia AT dodaveena blooddonornotificationandcounselingourexperiencefromatertiarycarehospitalinindia AT arorasatyam blooddonornotificationandcounselingourexperiencefromatertiarycarehospitalinindia AT bhardwajswati blooddonornotificationandcounselingourexperiencefromatertiarycarehospitalinindia |