Cargando…

Voluntary acceptance and consumption of two oral ciclosporin formulations in dogs: two randomised, controlled studies

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common canine allergic skin disease and can significantly affect the quality of life of affected dogs. Treating canine AD with ciclosporin has been a subject of great interest in recent years. Many studies have provided substantial evidence of ciclospor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Navarro, Christelle, Crastes, Nolwenn, Benizeau, Elodie, McGahie, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-015-0031-8
_version_ 1782358970673922048
author Navarro, Christelle
Crastes, Nolwenn
Benizeau, Elodie
McGahie, David
author_facet Navarro, Christelle
Crastes, Nolwenn
Benizeau, Elodie
McGahie, David
author_sort Navarro, Christelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common canine allergic skin disease and can significantly affect the quality of life of affected dogs. Treating canine AD with ciclosporin has been a subject of great interest in recent years. Many studies have provided substantial evidence of ciclosporin efficacy and safety in canine AD management, and for several years ciclosporin has been recognised as a major component of canine AD multimodal therapy. As a chronic condition, canine AD requires life-long medical management and treatment success relies in large part on product ease of administration. Two studies were conducted to assess the comparative voluntary acceptance and consumption of Cyclavance® (Virbac), a new oral liquid formulation of ciclosporin, and Atopica® (Novartis) either added to a small quantity of kibbles (study 1) or administered directly into the dog’s mouth (study 2). RESULTS: Over the course of the two studies 70 dogs assessed each of the ciclosporin formulations and 320 individual tests were performed for each tested product. Immediate prehension (in less than 2 seconds) occurred significantly more often with Cyclavance® (90.6% of the tests) than with Atopica® (14.4% of the tests) when products were mixed with 30 grams of dry food (p < 0.001). Moreover, Cyclavance® was significantly more often easily accepted than Atopica® (99.3% vs 27.1% of the tests, respectively) when products were administered directly into the dogs’ mouth (p < 0.0001). Cyclavance® was also more often totally consumed (98.3% of the tests) than Atopica® (2.2% of the tests) when mixed with a small amount of food (p < 0.001). However, both products were totally consumed once administered directly into the dogs’ mouth. CONCLUSIONS: By facilitating cicloporin administration and consumption, Cyclavance® liquid formulation offers an interesting alternative to capsules that may improve dosing compliance and therefore the ability to benefit from the therapeutic effects in the long-term treatment of canine AD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4340113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43401132015-02-26 Voluntary acceptance and consumption of two oral ciclosporin formulations in dogs: two randomised, controlled studies Navarro, Christelle Crastes, Nolwenn Benizeau, Elodie McGahie, David Ir Vet J Research BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common canine allergic skin disease and can significantly affect the quality of life of affected dogs. Treating canine AD with ciclosporin has been a subject of great interest in recent years. Many studies have provided substantial evidence of ciclosporin efficacy and safety in canine AD management, and for several years ciclosporin has been recognised as a major component of canine AD multimodal therapy. As a chronic condition, canine AD requires life-long medical management and treatment success relies in large part on product ease of administration. Two studies were conducted to assess the comparative voluntary acceptance and consumption of Cyclavance® (Virbac), a new oral liquid formulation of ciclosporin, and Atopica® (Novartis) either added to a small quantity of kibbles (study 1) or administered directly into the dog’s mouth (study 2). RESULTS: Over the course of the two studies 70 dogs assessed each of the ciclosporin formulations and 320 individual tests were performed for each tested product. Immediate prehension (in less than 2 seconds) occurred significantly more often with Cyclavance® (90.6% of the tests) than with Atopica® (14.4% of the tests) when products were mixed with 30 grams of dry food (p < 0.001). Moreover, Cyclavance® was significantly more often easily accepted than Atopica® (99.3% vs 27.1% of the tests, respectively) when products were administered directly into the dogs’ mouth (p < 0.0001). Cyclavance® was also more often totally consumed (98.3% of the tests) than Atopica® (2.2% of the tests) when mixed with a small amount of food (p < 0.001). However, both products were totally consumed once administered directly into the dogs’ mouth. CONCLUSIONS: By facilitating cicloporin administration and consumption, Cyclavance® liquid formulation offers an interesting alternative to capsules that may improve dosing compliance and therefore the ability to benefit from the therapeutic effects in the long-term treatment of canine AD. BioMed Central 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4340113/ /pubmed/25717361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-015-0031-8 Text en © Navarro et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Navarro, Christelle
Crastes, Nolwenn
Benizeau, Elodie
McGahie, David
Voluntary acceptance and consumption of two oral ciclosporin formulations in dogs: two randomised, controlled studies
title Voluntary acceptance and consumption of two oral ciclosporin formulations in dogs: two randomised, controlled studies
title_full Voluntary acceptance and consumption of two oral ciclosporin formulations in dogs: two randomised, controlled studies
title_fullStr Voluntary acceptance and consumption of two oral ciclosporin formulations in dogs: two randomised, controlled studies
title_full_unstemmed Voluntary acceptance and consumption of two oral ciclosporin formulations in dogs: two randomised, controlled studies
title_short Voluntary acceptance and consumption of two oral ciclosporin formulations in dogs: two randomised, controlled studies
title_sort voluntary acceptance and consumption of two oral ciclosporin formulations in dogs: two randomised, controlled studies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25717361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-015-0031-8
work_keys_str_mv AT navarrochristelle voluntaryacceptanceandconsumptionoftwooralciclosporinformulationsindogstworandomisedcontrolledstudies
AT crastesnolwenn voluntaryacceptanceandconsumptionoftwooralciclosporinformulationsindogstworandomisedcontrolledstudies
AT benizeauelodie voluntaryacceptanceandconsumptionoftwooralciclosporinformulationsindogstworandomisedcontrolledstudies
AT mcgahiedavid voluntaryacceptanceandconsumptionoftwooralciclosporinformulationsindogstworandomisedcontrolledstudies