Cargando…
The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation
Cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs) are remarkable, mechanically-active receptors that determine the exquisite sensitivity and frequency selectivity characteristic of the mammalian auditory system. While there are three to four times as many OHCs compared with inner hair cells, OHCs lack a significant...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25762901 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00012 |
_version_ | 1782358984410267648 |
---|---|
author | Smith, David W. Keil, Andreas |
author_facet | Smith, David W. Keil, Andreas |
author_sort | Smith, David W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs) are remarkable, mechanically-active receptors that determine the exquisite sensitivity and frequency selectivity characteristic of the mammalian auditory system. While there are three to four times as many OHCs compared with inner hair cells, OHCs lack a significant afferent innervation and, instead, receive a rich efferent innervation from medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent neurons. Activation of the MOC has been shown to exert a considerable suppressive effect over OHC activity. The precise function of these efferent tracts in auditory behavior, however, is the matter of considerable debate. The most frequent functions assigned to the MOC tracts are to protect the cochlea from traumatic damage associated with intense sound and to aid the detection of signals in noise. While considerable evidence shows that interruption of MOC activity exacerbates damage due to high-level sound exposure, the well characterized MOC physiology and evolutionary studies do not support such a role. Instead, a MOC protective effect is well explained as being a byproduct of the suppressive nature of MOC action on OHC mechanical behavior. A role in the enhancement of signals in noise backgrounds, on the other hand, is well supported by (1) an extensive physiological literature (2) examination of naturally occurring environmental acoustic conditions (3) recent data from multiple laboratories showing that the MOC plays a significant role in auditory selective attention by suppressing the response to unattended or ignored stimuli. This presentation will argue that, based on the extant literature combining the suppression of background noise through MOC-mediated rapid adaptation (RA) with the suppression of non-attended signals, in concert with the corticofugal pathways descending from the auditory cortex, the MOC system has one evolved function—to increase the signal-to-noise ratio, aiding in the detection of target signals. By contrast, the MOC system role in reducing noise damage and the effects of aging in the cochlea may well represent an exaptation, or evolutionary “spandrel”. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4340171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43401712015-03-11 The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation Smith, David W. Keil, Andreas Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs) are remarkable, mechanically-active receptors that determine the exquisite sensitivity and frequency selectivity characteristic of the mammalian auditory system. While there are three to four times as many OHCs compared with inner hair cells, OHCs lack a significant afferent innervation and, instead, receive a rich efferent innervation from medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferent neurons. Activation of the MOC has been shown to exert a considerable suppressive effect over OHC activity. The precise function of these efferent tracts in auditory behavior, however, is the matter of considerable debate. The most frequent functions assigned to the MOC tracts are to protect the cochlea from traumatic damage associated with intense sound and to aid the detection of signals in noise. While considerable evidence shows that interruption of MOC activity exacerbates damage due to high-level sound exposure, the well characterized MOC physiology and evolutionary studies do not support such a role. Instead, a MOC protective effect is well explained as being a byproduct of the suppressive nature of MOC action on OHC mechanical behavior. A role in the enhancement of signals in noise backgrounds, on the other hand, is well supported by (1) an extensive physiological literature (2) examination of naturally occurring environmental acoustic conditions (3) recent data from multiple laboratories showing that the MOC plays a significant role in auditory selective attention by suppressing the response to unattended or ignored stimuli. This presentation will argue that, based on the extant literature combining the suppression of background noise through MOC-mediated rapid adaptation (RA) with the suppression of non-attended signals, in concert with the corticofugal pathways descending from the auditory cortex, the MOC system has one evolved function—to increase the signal-to-noise ratio, aiding in the detection of target signals. By contrast, the MOC system role in reducing noise damage and the effects of aging in the cochlea may well represent an exaptation, or evolutionary “spandrel”. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4340171/ /pubmed/25762901 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00012 Text en Copyright © 2015 Smith and Keil. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Smith, David W. Keil, Andreas The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation |
title | The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation |
title_full | The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation |
title_fullStr | The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation |
title_full_unstemmed | The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation |
title_short | The biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation |
title_sort | biological role of the medial olivocochlear efferents in hearing: separating evolved function from exaptation |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25762901 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithdavidw thebiologicalroleofthemedialolivocochlearefferentsinhearingseparatingevolvedfunctionfromexaptation AT keilandreas thebiologicalroleofthemedialolivocochlearefferentsinhearingseparatingevolvedfunctionfromexaptation AT smithdavidw biologicalroleofthemedialolivocochlearefferentsinhearingseparatingevolvedfunctionfromexaptation AT keilandreas biologicalroleofthemedialolivocochlearefferentsinhearingseparatingevolvedfunctionfromexaptation |