Cargando…
No lasting legacy: no change in reporting of women's sports in the British print media with the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics
BACKGROUND: The proportion of media sports coverage devoted to women is reported at between 1 and 6%. Our survey examines and compares reporting patterns before and after the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics. METHODS: We collected data on sports coverage in six national newspapers on 3 weekend days in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24618182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu018 |
_version_ | 1782359010333163520 |
---|---|
author | Packer, C. Geh, D.J. Goulden, O.W. Jordan, A.M. Withers, G.K. Wagstaff, A.J. Bellwood, R.A. Binmore, C.L. Webster, C.L. |
author_facet | Packer, C. Geh, D.J. Goulden, O.W. Jordan, A.M. Withers, G.K. Wagstaff, A.J. Bellwood, R.A. Binmore, C.L. Webster, C.L. |
author_sort | Packer, C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The proportion of media sports coverage devoted to women is reported at between 1 and 6%. Our survey examines and compares reporting patterns before and after the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics. METHODS: We collected data on sports coverage in six national newspapers on 3 weekend days in February and March 2012, and in February 2013; ∼5 months before the opening of the 2012 Olympic Games and 5 months after the closing of the Paralympic Games. RESULTS: In 2012, 39 of 876 articles in national newspapers (4.5%) related to women's sports, compared with 22 of 755 (2.9%) in 2013; a non-significant reduction in coverage [difference 1.54%, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.28 to 3.36). In 2012, 24 of 647 pictures (3.7%) related to women's activities, compared with 10 of 738 (1.4%) in 2013; a significant reduction in coverage (difference 2.35%; 95% CI 0.68–4.03). The median area per article was significantly greater for men in both years. CONCLUSIONS: We found a continuing bias towards men's sport in the media analysed and no evidence of improvement either before or after the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics. Increased support of women's sport in the print media could benefit individuals and influence the health of the population. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4340323 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43403232015-03-10 No lasting legacy: no change in reporting of women's sports in the British print media with the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics Packer, C. Geh, D.J. Goulden, O.W. Jordan, A.M. Withers, G.K. Wagstaff, A.J. Bellwood, R.A. Binmore, C.L. Webster, C.L. J Public Health (Oxf) Wider Determinants BACKGROUND: The proportion of media sports coverage devoted to women is reported at between 1 and 6%. Our survey examines and compares reporting patterns before and after the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics. METHODS: We collected data on sports coverage in six national newspapers on 3 weekend days in February and March 2012, and in February 2013; ∼5 months before the opening of the 2012 Olympic Games and 5 months after the closing of the Paralympic Games. RESULTS: In 2012, 39 of 876 articles in national newspapers (4.5%) related to women's sports, compared with 22 of 755 (2.9%) in 2013; a non-significant reduction in coverage [difference 1.54%, 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.28 to 3.36). In 2012, 24 of 647 pictures (3.7%) related to women's activities, compared with 10 of 738 (1.4%) in 2013; a significant reduction in coverage (difference 2.35%; 95% CI 0.68–4.03). The median area per article was significantly greater for men in both years. CONCLUSIONS: We found a continuing bias towards men's sport in the media analysed and no evidence of improvement either before or after the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics. Increased support of women's sport in the print media could benefit individuals and influence the health of the population. Oxford University Press 2015-03 2014-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4340323/ /pubmed/24618182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu018 Text en © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Wider Determinants Packer, C. Geh, D.J. Goulden, O.W. Jordan, A.M. Withers, G.K. Wagstaff, A.J. Bellwood, R.A. Binmore, C.L. Webster, C.L. No lasting legacy: no change in reporting of women's sports in the British print media with the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics |
title | No lasting legacy: no change in reporting of women's sports in the British print media with the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics |
title_full | No lasting legacy: no change in reporting of women's sports in the British print media with the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics |
title_fullStr | No lasting legacy: no change in reporting of women's sports in the British print media with the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics |
title_full_unstemmed | No lasting legacy: no change in reporting of women's sports in the British print media with the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics |
title_short | No lasting legacy: no change in reporting of women's sports in the British print media with the London 2012 Olympics and Paralympics |
title_sort | no lasting legacy: no change in reporting of women's sports in the british print media with the london 2012 olympics and paralympics |
topic | Wider Determinants |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340323/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24618182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdu018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT packerc nolastinglegacynochangeinreportingofwomenssportsinthebritishprintmediawiththelondon2012olympicsandparalympics AT gehdj nolastinglegacynochangeinreportingofwomenssportsinthebritishprintmediawiththelondon2012olympicsandparalympics AT gouldenow nolastinglegacynochangeinreportingofwomenssportsinthebritishprintmediawiththelondon2012olympicsandparalympics AT jordanam nolastinglegacynochangeinreportingofwomenssportsinthebritishprintmediawiththelondon2012olympicsandparalympics AT withersgk nolastinglegacynochangeinreportingofwomenssportsinthebritishprintmediawiththelondon2012olympicsandparalympics AT wagstaffaj nolastinglegacynochangeinreportingofwomenssportsinthebritishprintmediawiththelondon2012olympicsandparalympics AT bellwoodra nolastinglegacynochangeinreportingofwomenssportsinthebritishprintmediawiththelondon2012olympicsandparalympics AT binmorecl nolastinglegacynochangeinreportingofwomenssportsinthebritishprintmediawiththelondon2012olympicsandparalympics AT webstercl nolastinglegacynochangeinreportingofwomenssportsinthebritishprintmediawiththelondon2012olympicsandparalympics |