Cargando…

Platelet function tests: a comparative review

In physiological hemostasis a prompt recruitment of platelets on the vessel damage prevents the bleeding by the rapid formation of a platelet plug. Qualitative and/or quantitative platelet defects promote bleeding, whereas the high residual reactivity of platelets in patients on antiplatelet therapi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paniccia, Rita, Priora, Raffaella, Alessandrello Liotta, Agatina, Abbate, Rosanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25733843
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S44469
_version_ 1782359028187267072
author Paniccia, Rita
Priora, Raffaella
Alessandrello Liotta, Agatina
Abbate, Rosanna
author_facet Paniccia, Rita
Priora, Raffaella
Alessandrello Liotta, Agatina
Abbate, Rosanna
author_sort Paniccia, Rita
collection PubMed
description In physiological hemostasis a prompt recruitment of platelets on the vessel damage prevents the bleeding by the rapid formation of a platelet plug. Qualitative and/or quantitative platelet defects promote bleeding, whereas the high residual reactivity of platelets in patients on antiplatelet therapies moves forward thromboembolic complications. The biochemical mechanisms of the different phases of platelet activation – adhesion, shape change, release reaction, and aggregation – have been well delineated, whereas their complete translation into laboratory assays has not been so fulfilled. Laboratory tests of platelet function, such as bleeding time, light transmission platelet aggregation, lumiaggregometry, impedance aggregometry on whole blood, and platelet activation investigated by flow cytometry, are traditionally utilized for diagnosing hemostatic disorders and managing patients with platelet and hemostatic defects, but their use is still limited to specialized laboratories. To date, a point-of-care testing (POCT) dedicated to platelet function, using pertinent devices much simpler to use, has now become available (ie, PFA-100, VerifyNow System, Multiplate Electrode Aggregometry [MEA]). POCT includes new methodologies which may be used in critical clinical settings and also in general laboratories because they are rapid and easy to use, employing whole blood without the necessity of sample processing. Actually, these different platelet methodologies for the evaluation of inherited and acquired bleeding disorders and/or for monitoring antiplatelet therapies are spreading and the study of platelet function is strengthening. In this review, well-tried and innovative platelet function tests and their methodological features and clinical applications are considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4340464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43404642015-03-02 Platelet function tests: a comparative review Paniccia, Rita Priora, Raffaella Alessandrello Liotta, Agatina Abbate, Rosanna Vasc Health Risk Manag Review In physiological hemostasis a prompt recruitment of platelets on the vessel damage prevents the bleeding by the rapid formation of a platelet plug. Qualitative and/or quantitative platelet defects promote bleeding, whereas the high residual reactivity of platelets in patients on antiplatelet therapies moves forward thromboembolic complications. The biochemical mechanisms of the different phases of platelet activation – adhesion, shape change, release reaction, and aggregation – have been well delineated, whereas their complete translation into laboratory assays has not been so fulfilled. Laboratory tests of platelet function, such as bleeding time, light transmission platelet aggregation, lumiaggregometry, impedance aggregometry on whole blood, and platelet activation investigated by flow cytometry, are traditionally utilized for diagnosing hemostatic disorders and managing patients with platelet and hemostatic defects, but their use is still limited to specialized laboratories. To date, a point-of-care testing (POCT) dedicated to platelet function, using pertinent devices much simpler to use, has now become available (ie, PFA-100, VerifyNow System, Multiplate Electrode Aggregometry [MEA]). POCT includes new methodologies which may be used in critical clinical settings and also in general laboratories because they are rapid and easy to use, employing whole blood without the necessity of sample processing. Actually, these different platelet methodologies for the evaluation of inherited and acquired bleeding disorders and/or for monitoring antiplatelet therapies are spreading and the study of platelet function is strengthening. In this review, well-tried and innovative platelet function tests and their methodological features and clinical applications are considered. Dove Medical Press 2015-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4340464/ /pubmed/25733843 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S44469 Text en © 2015 Paniccia et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Paniccia, Rita
Priora, Raffaella
Alessandrello Liotta, Agatina
Abbate, Rosanna
Platelet function tests: a comparative review
title Platelet function tests: a comparative review
title_full Platelet function tests: a comparative review
title_fullStr Platelet function tests: a comparative review
title_full_unstemmed Platelet function tests: a comparative review
title_short Platelet function tests: a comparative review
title_sort platelet function tests: a comparative review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25733843
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S44469
work_keys_str_mv AT panicciarita plateletfunctiontestsacomparativereview
AT prioraraffaella plateletfunctiontestsacomparativereview
AT alessandrelloliottaagatina plateletfunctiontestsacomparativereview
AT abbaterosanna plateletfunctiontestsacomparativereview