Cargando…

Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Adult Upper Limb Spasticity

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elucidate clinical trial efficacy, safety, and dosing practices of abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) treatment in adult patients with upper limb spasticity (ULS). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials and other c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dashtipour, Khashayar, Chen, Jack J., Walker, Heather W., Lee, Michael Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25299523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000208
_version_ 1782359038787321856
author Dashtipour, Khashayar
Chen, Jack J.
Walker, Heather W.
Lee, Michael Y.
author_facet Dashtipour, Khashayar
Chen, Jack J.
Walker, Heather W.
Lee, Michael Y.
author_sort Dashtipour, Khashayar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elucidate clinical trial efficacy, safety, and dosing practices of abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) treatment in adult patients with upper limb spasticity (ULS). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials and other comparative clinical studies of ABO in the treatment of adult ULS published in English between January 1991 and January 2013. Medical literature databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) were searched, and a total of 295 records were identified. Of these, 12 primary publications that evaluated ABO for the management of ULS were included in the final data report. SYNTHESIS: Total ABO doses ranged between 500 and 1500 U for ULS. Most of the studies in ULS showed statistically significant benefits (reduction in muscle tone based on Ashworth score) of ABO vs. placebo. Statistical significance was reached for most evaluations of spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Statistically significant effects on active movement and pain were demonstrated, albeit less consistently. ABO was generally well tolerated across the individual studies; most adverse events reported were considered unrelated to treatment. Adverse events considered associated with ABO treatment included fatigue, tiredness, arm pain, skin rashes, flu-like symptoms, worsening of spasm, and weakness. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of data extracted from 12 randomized clinical studies, a strong evidence base (9/12 studies) exists for the use of ABO to reduce ULS caused by stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4340600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43406002015-03-12 Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Adult Upper Limb Spasticity Dashtipour, Khashayar Chen, Jack J. Walker, Heather W. Lee, Michael Y. Am J Phys Med Rehabil Literature Review OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to elucidate clinical trial efficacy, safety, and dosing practices of abobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) treatment in adult patients with upper limb spasticity (ULS). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed to identify randomized controlled trials and other comparative clinical studies of ABO in the treatment of adult ULS published in English between January 1991 and January 2013. Medical literature databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE) were searched, and a total of 295 records were identified. Of these, 12 primary publications that evaluated ABO for the management of ULS were included in the final data report. SYNTHESIS: Total ABO doses ranged between 500 and 1500 U for ULS. Most of the studies in ULS showed statistically significant benefits (reduction in muscle tone based on Ashworth score) of ABO vs. placebo. Statistical significance was reached for most evaluations of spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Statistically significant effects on active movement and pain were demonstrated, albeit less consistently. ABO was generally well tolerated across the individual studies; most adverse events reported were considered unrelated to treatment. Adverse events considered associated with ABO treatment included fatigue, tiredness, arm pain, skin rashes, flu-like symptoms, worsening of spasm, and weakness. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of data extracted from 12 randomized clinical studies, a strong evidence base (9/12 studies) exists for the use of ABO to reduce ULS caused by stroke. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-03 2015-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4340600/ /pubmed/25299523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000208 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Literature Review
Dashtipour, Khashayar
Chen, Jack J.
Walker, Heather W.
Lee, Michael Y.
Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Adult Upper Limb Spasticity
title Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Adult Upper Limb Spasticity
title_full Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Adult Upper Limb Spasticity
title_fullStr Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Adult Upper Limb Spasticity
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Adult Upper Limb Spasticity
title_short Systematic Literature Review of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Clinical Trials for Adult Upper Limb Spasticity
title_sort systematic literature review of abobotulinumtoxina in clinical trials for adult upper limb spasticity
topic Literature Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4340600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25299523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000208
work_keys_str_mv AT dashtipourkhashayar systematicliteraturereviewofabobotulinumtoxinainclinicaltrialsforadultupperlimbspasticity
AT chenjackj systematicliteraturereviewofabobotulinumtoxinainclinicaltrialsforadultupperlimbspasticity
AT walkerheatherw systematicliteraturereviewofabobotulinumtoxinainclinicaltrialsforadultupperlimbspasticity
AT leemichaely systematicliteraturereviewofabobotulinumtoxinainclinicaltrialsforadultupperlimbspasticity