Cargando…
Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation
Background: Coaptive film (i.e., Steri-Strips™) is an adhesive tape used to replace sutures in wound closure. The use of coaptive film for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation has not been well documented in the literature. Methods: The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4341050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722808 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1303.017 |
_version_ | 1782359108518674432 |
---|---|
author | Anuar Ramdhan, IM Zulmi, W Hidayah, AN Kamel, MJM Fadhil, MSM Anwar Hau, M |
author_facet | Anuar Ramdhan, IM Zulmi, W Hidayah, AN Kamel, MJM Fadhil, MSM Anwar Hau, M |
author_sort | Anuar Ramdhan, IM |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Coaptive film (i.e., Steri-Strips™) is an adhesive tape used to replace sutures in wound closure. The use of coaptive film for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation has not been well documented in the literature. Methods: The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing coaptive film with sutures for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation was skin closure time, incidence of wound complications and scar width at 12 week follow-up. Forty-five patients underwent femur fracture fixation (22 patients’ wound closed with sutures, 23 with coaptive film). Results: The mean time for skin closure using coaptive film was 171.13 seconds compared to 437.27 seconds using suture. The mean wound lengths in the coaptive film group and suture group were 187.65 mm and 196.73 mm, respectively. One patient in each group had wound complications. Conclusion: Coaptive film is a time-saving procedure for skin closure following long bone fracture fixation. There is no difference in the incidence of wound complications and scar width between these two methods of skin closure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4341050 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Malaysian Orthopaedic Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43410502015-02-26 Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation Anuar Ramdhan, IM Zulmi, W Hidayah, AN Kamel, MJM Fadhil, MSM Anwar Hau, M Malays Orthop J Research Article Background: Coaptive film (i.e., Steri-Strips™) is an adhesive tape used to replace sutures in wound closure. The use of coaptive film for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation has not been well documented in the literature. Methods: The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing coaptive film with sutures for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation was skin closure time, incidence of wound complications and scar width at 12 week follow-up. Forty-five patients underwent femur fracture fixation (22 patients’ wound closed with sutures, 23 with coaptive film). Results: The mean time for skin closure using coaptive film was 171.13 seconds compared to 437.27 seconds using suture. The mean wound lengths in the coaptive film group and suture group were 187.65 mm and 196.73 mm, respectively. One patient in each group had wound complications. Conclusion: Coaptive film is a time-saving procedure for skin closure following long bone fracture fixation. There is no difference in the incidence of wound complications and scar width between these two methods of skin closure. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4341050/ /pubmed/25722808 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1303.017 Text en Copyright © 2014, Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Anuar Ramdhan, IM Zulmi, W Hidayah, AN Kamel, MJM Fadhil, MSM Anwar Hau, M Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation |
title | Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture
For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation |
title_full | Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture
For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture
For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture
For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation |
title_short | Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture
For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation |
title_sort | comparative study between coaptive film versus suture
for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4341050/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722808 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1303.017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anuarramdhanim comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation AT zulmiw comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation AT hidayahan comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation AT kamelmjm comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation AT fadhilmsm comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation AT anwarhaum comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation |