Cargando…

Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation

Background: Coaptive film (i.e., Steri-Strips™) is an adhesive tape used to replace sutures in wound closure. The use of coaptive film for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation has not been well documented in the literature. Methods: The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anuar Ramdhan, IM, Zulmi, W, Hidayah, AN, Kamel, MJM, Fadhil, MSM, Anwar Hau, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4341050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722808
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1303.017
_version_ 1782359108518674432
author Anuar Ramdhan, IM
Zulmi, W
Hidayah, AN
Kamel, MJM
Fadhil, MSM
Anwar Hau, M
author_facet Anuar Ramdhan, IM
Zulmi, W
Hidayah, AN
Kamel, MJM
Fadhil, MSM
Anwar Hau, M
author_sort Anuar Ramdhan, IM
collection PubMed
description Background: Coaptive film (i.e., Steri-Strips™) is an adhesive tape used to replace sutures in wound closure. The use of coaptive film for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation has not been well documented in the literature. Methods: The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing coaptive film with sutures for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation was skin closure time, incidence of wound complications and scar width at 12 week follow-up. Forty-five patients underwent femur fracture fixation (22 patients’ wound closed with sutures, 23 with coaptive film). Results: The mean time for skin closure using coaptive film was 171.13 seconds compared to 437.27 seconds using suture. The mean wound lengths in the coaptive film group and suture group were 187.65 mm and 196.73 mm, respectively. One patient in each group had wound complications. Conclusion: Coaptive film is a time-saving procedure for skin closure following long bone fracture fixation. There is no difference in the incidence of wound complications and scar width between these two methods of skin closure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4341050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43410502015-02-26 Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation Anuar Ramdhan, IM Zulmi, W Hidayah, AN Kamel, MJM Fadhil, MSM Anwar Hau, M Malays Orthop J Research Article Background: Coaptive film (i.e., Steri-Strips™) is an adhesive tape used to replace sutures in wound closure. The use of coaptive film for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation has not been well documented in the literature. Methods: The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing coaptive film with sutures for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation was skin closure time, incidence of wound complications and scar width at 12 week follow-up. Forty-five patients underwent femur fracture fixation (22 patients’ wound closed with sutures, 23 with coaptive film). Results: The mean time for skin closure using coaptive film was 171.13 seconds compared to 437.27 seconds using suture. The mean wound lengths in the coaptive film group and suture group were 187.65 mm and 196.73 mm, respectively. One patient in each group had wound complications. Conclusion: Coaptive film is a time-saving procedure for skin closure following long bone fracture fixation. There is no difference in the incidence of wound complications and scar width between these two methods of skin closure. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2013-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4341050/ /pubmed/25722808 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1303.017 Text en Copyright © 2014, Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Anuar Ramdhan, IM
Zulmi, W
Hidayah, AN
Kamel, MJM
Fadhil, MSM
Anwar Hau, M
Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation
title Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation
title_full Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation
title_fullStr Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation
title_short Comparative Study Between Coaptive Film Versus Suture For Wound Closure After Long Bone Fracture Fixation
title_sort comparative study between coaptive film versus suture for wound closure after long bone fracture fixation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4341050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25722808
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1303.017
work_keys_str_mv AT anuarramdhanim comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation
AT zulmiw comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation
AT hidayahan comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation
AT kamelmjm comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation
AT fadhilmsm comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation
AT anwarhaum comparativestudybetweencoaptivefilmversussutureforwoundclosureafterlongbonefracturefixation