Cargando…

Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations?

BACKGROUND: The effect of MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations is an important health issue that should be considered. If MRI application causes increase of microleakage, amalgam fillings should be reassessed after MRI and replaced if necessary. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akgun, Ozlem Marti, Polat, Gunseli Guven, Turan Illca, Ahmet, Yildirim, Ceren, Demir, Pervin, Basak, Feridun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4341166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25763074
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.15565
_version_ 1782359134283235328
author Akgun, Ozlem Marti
Polat, Gunseli Guven
Turan Illca, Ahmet
Yildirim, Ceren
Demir, Pervin
Basak, Feridun
author_facet Akgun, Ozlem Marti
Polat, Gunseli Guven
Turan Illca, Ahmet
Yildirim, Ceren
Demir, Pervin
Basak, Feridun
author_sort Akgun, Ozlem Marti
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The effect of MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations is an important health issue that should be considered. If MRI application causes increase of microleakage, amalgam fillings should be reassessed after MRI and replaced if necessary. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on microleakage of class II bonded amalgam versus classical amalgam restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class II cavities (3 mm width × 1.5 mm depth) with gingival margins ending 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) were prepared in 40 permanent molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups. Cavities in the first and second groups were restored with dentin adhesive and amalgam (bonded amalgam), and those in the third and fourth groups with amalgam only. MRI was performed with the teeth specimens from the first and third groups. All specimens were then thermocycled at 5° to 55° C with a 30-second dwell time for 1000 cycles. The samples were then immersed in 0.5% methylene blue dye for 24 hours and sectioned longitudinally. Dye penetration at the occlusal and gingival margins was quantified by 15× stereomicroscopy. IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp., Released 2012., IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) and MS-Excel 2007 programs were used for statistical analyses and calculations. “nparLD” module was used for F2_LD_F1 design analysis at R program. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In teeth with amalgam filling, there were no significant differences of occlusal and gingival surface microleakage after MRI exposure. Occlusal and gingival surface microleakages were also similar with and without MRI in teeth with bonded amalgam filling. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that MRI does not increase microleakage of amalgam restorations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4341166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43411662015-03-11 Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations? Akgun, Ozlem Marti Polat, Gunseli Guven Turan Illca, Ahmet Yildirim, Ceren Demir, Pervin Basak, Feridun Iran J Radiol Head& Neck Imaging BACKGROUND: The effect of MRI on microleakage of amalgam restorations is an important health issue that should be considered. If MRI application causes increase of microleakage, amalgam fillings should be reassessed after MRI and replaced if necessary. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the effect of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on microleakage of class II bonded amalgam versus classical amalgam restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Class II cavities (3 mm width × 1.5 mm depth) with gingival margins ending 1 mm below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) were prepared in 40 permanent molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups. Cavities in the first and second groups were restored with dentin adhesive and amalgam (bonded amalgam), and those in the third and fourth groups with amalgam only. MRI was performed with the teeth specimens from the first and third groups. All specimens were then thermocycled at 5° to 55° C with a 30-second dwell time for 1000 cycles. The samples were then immersed in 0.5% methylene blue dye for 24 hours and sectioned longitudinally. Dye penetration at the occlusal and gingival margins was quantified by 15× stereomicroscopy. IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 21.0 (IBM Corp., Released 2012., IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) and MS-Excel 2007 programs were used for statistical analyses and calculations. “nparLD” module was used for F2_LD_F1 design analysis at R program. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In teeth with amalgam filling, there were no significant differences of occlusal and gingival surface microleakage after MRI exposure. Occlusal and gingival surface microleakages were also similar with and without MRI in teeth with bonded amalgam filling. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that MRI does not increase microleakage of amalgam restorations. Kowsar 2014-08-01 2014-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4341166/ /pubmed/25763074 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.15565 Text en Copyright © 2014, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology; Published by Kowsar Corp. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Head& Neck Imaging
Akgun, Ozlem Marti
Polat, Gunseli Guven
Turan Illca, Ahmet
Yildirim, Ceren
Demir, Pervin
Basak, Feridun
Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations?
title Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations?
title_full Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations?
title_fullStr Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations?
title_full_unstemmed Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations?
title_short Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Affect the Microleakage of Amalgam Restorations?
title_sort does magnetic resonance imaging affect the microleakage of amalgam restorations?
topic Head& Neck Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4341166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25763074
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.15565
work_keys_str_mv AT akgunozlemmarti doesmagneticresonanceimagingaffectthemicroleakageofamalgamrestorations
AT polatgunseliguven doesmagneticresonanceimagingaffectthemicroleakageofamalgamrestorations
AT turanillcaahmet doesmagneticresonanceimagingaffectthemicroleakageofamalgamrestorations
AT yildirimceren doesmagneticresonanceimagingaffectthemicroleakageofamalgamrestorations
AT demirpervin doesmagneticresonanceimagingaffectthemicroleakageofamalgamrestorations
AT basakferidun doesmagneticresonanceimagingaffectthemicroleakageofamalgamrestorations