Cargando…
In Vitro Evaluation of Allergen Potencies of Commercial House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Reagents
PURPOSE: The clinical efficacy of allergen-immunotherapy is known to be dose dependent. However, optimal maintenance dosage has not yet been determined for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Furthermore, since companies adopt their own units for expression of allergenicity, the allergen concentrations...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology; The Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4341333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729619 http://dx.doi.org/10.4168/aair.2015.7.2.124 |
_version_ | 1782359173402460160 |
---|---|
author | Park, Kyung Hee Son, Mina Choi, Soo-Young Park, Hey Jung Lee, Jae-Hyun Jeong, Kyoung Yong Lee, Joo-Shil Park, Jung-Won |
author_facet | Park, Kyung Hee Son, Mina Choi, Soo-Young Park, Hey Jung Lee, Jae-Hyun Jeong, Kyoung Yong Lee, Joo-Shil Park, Jung-Won |
author_sort | Park, Kyung Hee |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The clinical efficacy of allergen-immunotherapy is known to be dose dependent. However, optimal maintenance dosage has not yet been determined for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Furthermore, since companies adopt their own units for expression of allergenicity, the allergen concentrations of individual reagents cannot be compared easily. We sought to measure and compare the allergenicities of 3 commercially available house dust mite (HDM) SLIT regents and a subcutaneous immunotherapy reagent. METHODS: We measured the HDM allergenic potency of the maintenance dosages of three SLIT reagents: Staloral® (300 index of reactivity [IR] /mL, recommended maintenance dosage [MD]: 120 IR), SLITone® (1,000 standard therapeutic unit [STU]/mL, recommended MD: 200 STU), Wolwopharma® (100 µg/mL, recommended MD: 20 µg), and subcutaneous immunotherapy regents of Hollister-Stier (10,000 allergy unit [AU] /mL). The allergenic potency was assessed by measuring the total protein concentrations, mite group 1 and 2 allergens using 2-site ELISA, and an inhibition test against IgE specific to Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. RESULTS: The protein content of the Wolwopharma® reagent was 1.5-261.4 times higher than that of the other 2 SLIT reagents. The concentration of group 1 major allergens in Staloral® (132.03 µg/mL) was 33- to 44.5-fold higher than in SLITone® (4.00 µg/mL) and Wolwopharma® (2.97 µg/mL). The concentration of group 2 major allergen was also 8.9- to 10.5-fold higher in Staloral® (15.7 µg/mL) than in SLITone® (1.8 µg/mL) or Wolwopharma® (1.5 µg/mL). An ELISA inhibition study against HDM-specific IgE showed that the allergen potency of Staloral® reagent is 8.5-fold and 21-fold higher than that of SLITone® or Wolwopharma®, respectively. The differences between the maintenance dosages are further exaggerated by the differences in the recommended volumes of SLIT reagents. CONCLUSIONS: The allergen potencies of commercially available HDM SLIT reagents are markedly different. Consensus regarding the optimal allergen concentration for SLIT reagents used to treat HDM respiratory allergies is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4341333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology; The Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43413332015-03-01 In Vitro Evaluation of Allergen Potencies of Commercial House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Reagents Park, Kyung Hee Son, Mina Choi, Soo-Young Park, Hey Jung Lee, Jae-Hyun Jeong, Kyoung Yong Lee, Joo-Shil Park, Jung-Won Allergy Asthma Immunol Res Original Article PURPOSE: The clinical efficacy of allergen-immunotherapy is known to be dose dependent. However, optimal maintenance dosage has not yet been determined for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Furthermore, since companies adopt their own units for expression of allergenicity, the allergen concentrations of individual reagents cannot be compared easily. We sought to measure and compare the allergenicities of 3 commercially available house dust mite (HDM) SLIT regents and a subcutaneous immunotherapy reagent. METHODS: We measured the HDM allergenic potency of the maintenance dosages of three SLIT reagents: Staloral® (300 index of reactivity [IR] /mL, recommended maintenance dosage [MD]: 120 IR), SLITone® (1,000 standard therapeutic unit [STU]/mL, recommended MD: 200 STU), Wolwopharma® (100 µg/mL, recommended MD: 20 µg), and subcutaneous immunotherapy regents of Hollister-Stier (10,000 allergy unit [AU] /mL). The allergenic potency was assessed by measuring the total protein concentrations, mite group 1 and 2 allergens using 2-site ELISA, and an inhibition test against IgE specific to Dermatophagoides farinae and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. RESULTS: The protein content of the Wolwopharma® reagent was 1.5-261.4 times higher than that of the other 2 SLIT reagents. The concentration of group 1 major allergens in Staloral® (132.03 µg/mL) was 33- to 44.5-fold higher than in SLITone® (4.00 µg/mL) and Wolwopharma® (2.97 µg/mL). The concentration of group 2 major allergen was also 8.9- to 10.5-fold higher in Staloral® (15.7 µg/mL) than in SLITone® (1.8 µg/mL) or Wolwopharma® (1.5 µg/mL). An ELISA inhibition study against HDM-specific IgE showed that the allergen potency of Staloral® reagent is 8.5-fold and 21-fold higher than that of SLITone® or Wolwopharma®, respectively. The differences between the maintenance dosages are further exaggerated by the differences in the recommended volumes of SLIT reagents. CONCLUSIONS: The allergen potencies of commercially available HDM SLIT reagents are markedly different. Consensus regarding the optimal allergen concentration for SLIT reagents used to treat HDM respiratory allergies is needed. The Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology; The Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease 2015-03 2014-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4341333/ /pubmed/25729619 http://dx.doi.org/10.4168/aair.2015.7.2.124 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology • The Korean Academy of Pediatric Allergy and Respiratory Disease http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Park, Kyung Hee Son, Mina Choi, Soo-Young Park, Hey Jung Lee, Jae-Hyun Jeong, Kyoung Yong Lee, Joo-Shil Park, Jung-Won In Vitro Evaluation of Allergen Potencies of Commercial House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Reagents |
title | In Vitro Evaluation of Allergen Potencies of Commercial House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Reagents |
title_full | In Vitro Evaluation of Allergen Potencies of Commercial House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Reagents |
title_fullStr | In Vitro Evaluation of Allergen Potencies of Commercial House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Reagents |
title_full_unstemmed | In Vitro Evaluation of Allergen Potencies of Commercial House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Reagents |
title_short | In Vitro Evaluation of Allergen Potencies of Commercial House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy Reagents |
title_sort | in vitro evaluation of allergen potencies of commercial house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy reagents |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4341333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25729619 http://dx.doi.org/10.4168/aair.2015.7.2.124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkkyunghee invitroevaluationofallergenpotenciesofcommercialhousedustmitesublingualimmunotherapyreagents AT sonmina invitroevaluationofallergenpotenciesofcommercialhousedustmitesublingualimmunotherapyreagents AT choisooyoung invitroevaluationofallergenpotenciesofcommercialhousedustmitesublingualimmunotherapyreagents AT parkheyjung invitroevaluationofallergenpotenciesofcommercialhousedustmitesublingualimmunotherapyreagents AT leejaehyun invitroevaluationofallergenpotenciesofcommercialhousedustmitesublingualimmunotherapyreagents AT jeongkyoungyong invitroevaluationofallergenpotenciesofcommercialhousedustmitesublingualimmunotherapyreagents AT leejooshil invitroevaluationofallergenpotenciesofcommercialhousedustmitesublingualimmunotherapyreagents AT parkjungwon invitroevaluationofallergenpotenciesofcommercialhousedustmitesublingualimmunotherapyreagents |