Cargando…

Analytical platform evaluation for quantification of ERG in prostate cancer using protein and mRNA detection methods

BACKGROUND: The established methods for detecting prostate cancer (CaP) are based on tests using PSA (blood), PCA3 (urine), and AMACR (tissue) as biomarkers in patient samples. The demonstration of ERG oncoprotein overexpression due to gene fusion in CaP has thus provided ERG as an additional biomar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Jintang, Schepmoes, Athena A, Shi, Tujin, Wu, Chaochao, Fillmore, Thomas L, Gao, Yuqian, Smith, Richard D, Qian, Wei-Jun, Rodland, Karin D, Liu, Tao, Camp, David G, Rastogi, Anshu, Tan, Shyh-Han, Yan, Wusheng, Mohamed, Ahmed A, Huang, Wei, Banerjee, Sreedatta, Kagan, Jacob, Srivastava, Sudhir, McLeod, David G, Srivastava, Shiv, Petrovics, Gyorgy, Dobi, Albert, Srinivasan, Alagarsamy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0418-z
_version_ 1782359238951043072
author He, Jintang
Schepmoes, Athena A
Shi, Tujin
Wu, Chaochao
Fillmore, Thomas L
Gao, Yuqian
Smith, Richard D
Qian, Wei-Jun
Rodland, Karin D
Liu, Tao
Camp, David G
Rastogi, Anshu
Tan, Shyh-Han
Yan, Wusheng
Mohamed, Ahmed A
Huang, Wei
Banerjee, Sreedatta
Kagan, Jacob
Srivastava, Sudhir
McLeod, David G
Srivastava, Shiv
Petrovics, Gyorgy
Dobi, Albert
Srinivasan, Alagarsamy
author_facet He, Jintang
Schepmoes, Athena A
Shi, Tujin
Wu, Chaochao
Fillmore, Thomas L
Gao, Yuqian
Smith, Richard D
Qian, Wei-Jun
Rodland, Karin D
Liu, Tao
Camp, David G
Rastogi, Anshu
Tan, Shyh-Han
Yan, Wusheng
Mohamed, Ahmed A
Huang, Wei
Banerjee, Sreedatta
Kagan, Jacob
Srivastava, Sudhir
McLeod, David G
Srivastava, Shiv
Petrovics, Gyorgy
Dobi, Albert
Srinivasan, Alagarsamy
author_sort He, Jintang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The established methods for detecting prostate cancer (CaP) are based on tests using PSA (blood), PCA3 (urine), and AMACR (tissue) as biomarkers in patient samples. The demonstration of ERG oncoprotein overexpression due to gene fusion in CaP has thus provided ERG as an additional biomarker. Based on this, we hypothesized that ERG protein quantification methods can be of use in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS: An antibody-free assay for ERG3 protein detection was developed based on PRISM (high-pressure high-resolution separations with intelligent selection and multiplexing)-SRM (selected reaction monitoring) mass spectrometry. We utilized TMPRSS2-ERG positive VCaP and TMPRSS2-ERG negative LNCaP cells to simulate three different sample types (cells, tissue, and post-DRE urine sediment). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), western blot, NanoString, and qRT-PCR were also used in the analysis of these samples. RESULTS: Recombinant ERG3 protein spiked into LNCaP cell lysates could be detected at levels as low as 20 pg by PRISM-SRM analysis. The sensitivity of the PRISM-SRM assay was approximately 10,000 VCaP cells in a mixed cell population model of VCaP and LNCaP cells. Interestingly, ERG protein could be detected in as few as 600 VCaP cells spiked into female urine. The sensitivity of the in-house ELISA was similar to the PRISM-SRM assay, with detection of 30 pg of purified recombinant ERG3 protein and 10,000 VCaP cells. On the other hand, qRT-PCR exhibited a higher sensitivity, as TMPRSS2-ERG transcripts were detected in as few as 100 VCaP cells, in comparison to NanoString methodologies which detected ERG from 10,000 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this data, we propose that the detection of both ERG transcriptional products with RNA-based assays, as well as protein products of ERG using PRISM-SRM assays, may be of clinical value in developing diagnostic and prognostic assays for prostate cancer given their sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4342100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43421002015-02-27 Analytical platform evaluation for quantification of ERG in prostate cancer using protein and mRNA detection methods He, Jintang Schepmoes, Athena A Shi, Tujin Wu, Chaochao Fillmore, Thomas L Gao, Yuqian Smith, Richard D Qian, Wei-Jun Rodland, Karin D Liu, Tao Camp, David G Rastogi, Anshu Tan, Shyh-Han Yan, Wusheng Mohamed, Ahmed A Huang, Wei Banerjee, Sreedatta Kagan, Jacob Srivastava, Sudhir McLeod, David G Srivastava, Shiv Petrovics, Gyorgy Dobi, Albert Srinivasan, Alagarsamy J Transl Med Methodology BACKGROUND: The established methods for detecting prostate cancer (CaP) are based on tests using PSA (blood), PCA3 (urine), and AMACR (tissue) as biomarkers in patient samples. The demonstration of ERG oncoprotein overexpression due to gene fusion in CaP has thus provided ERG as an additional biomarker. Based on this, we hypothesized that ERG protein quantification methods can be of use in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. METHODS: An antibody-free assay for ERG3 protein detection was developed based on PRISM (high-pressure high-resolution separations with intelligent selection and multiplexing)-SRM (selected reaction monitoring) mass spectrometry. We utilized TMPRSS2-ERG positive VCaP and TMPRSS2-ERG negative LNCaP cells to simulate three different sample types (cells, tissue, and post-DRE urine sediment). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), western blot, NanoString, and qRT-PCR were also used in the analysis of these samples. RESULTS: Recombinant ERG3 protein spiked into LNCaP cell lysates could be detected at levels as low as 20 pg by PRISM-SRM analysis. The sensitivity of the PRISM-SRM assay was approximately 10,000 VCaP cells in a mixed cell population model of VCaP and LNCaP cells. Interestingly, ERG protein could be detected in as few as 600 VCaP cells spiked into female urine. The sensitivity of the in-house ELISA was similar to the PRISM-SRM assay, with detection of 30 pg of purified recombinant ERG3 protein and 10,000 VCaP cells. On the other hand, qRT-PCR exhibited a higher sensitivity, as TMPRSS2-ERG transcripts were detected in as few as 100 VCaP cells, in comparison to NanoString methodologies which detected ERG from 10,000 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this data, we propose that the detection of both ERG transcriptional products with RNA-based assays, as well as protein products of ERG using PRISM-SRM assays, may be of clinical value in developing diagnostic and prognostic assays for prostate cancer given their sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility. BioMed Central 2015-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4342100/ /pubmed/25889691 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0418-z Text en © He et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
He, Jintang
Schepmoes, Athena A
Shi, Tujin
Wu, Chaochao
Fillmore, Thomas L
Gao, Yuqian
Smith, Richard D
Qian, Wei-Jun
Rodland, Karin D
Liu, Tao
Camp, David G
Rastogi, Anshu
Tan, Shyh-Han
Yan, Wusheng
Mohamed, Ahmed A
Huang, Wei
Banerjee, Sreedatta
Kagan, Jacob
Srivastava, Sudhir
McLeod, David G
Srivastava, Shiv
Petrovics, Gyorgy
Dobi, Albert
Srinivasan, Alagarsamy
Analytical platform evaluation for quantification of ERG in prostate cancer using protein and mRNA detection methods
title Analytical platform evaluation for quantification of ERG in prostate cancer using protein and mRNA detection methods
title_full Analytical platform evaluation for quantification of ERG in prostate cancer using protein and mRNA detection methods
title_fullStr Analytical platform evaluation for quantification of ERG in prostate cancer using protein and mRNA detection methods
title_full_unstemmed Analytical platform evaluation for quantification of ERG in prostate cancer using protein and mRNA detection methods
title_short Analytical platform evaluation for quantification of ERG in prostate cancer using protein and mRNA detection methods
title_sort analytical platform evaluation for quantification of erg in prostate cancer using protein and mrna detection methods
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25889691
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-015-0418-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hejintang analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT schepmoesathenaa analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT shitujin analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT wuchaochao analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT fillmorethomasl analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT gaoyuqian analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT smithrichardd analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT qianweijun analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT rodlandkarind analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT liutao analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT campdavidg analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT rastogianshu analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT tanshyhhan analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT yanwusheng analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT mohamedahmeda analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT huangwei analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT banerjeesreedatta analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT kaganjacob analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT srivastavasudhir analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT mcleoddavidg analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT srivastavashiv analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT petrovicsgyorgy analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT dobialbert analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods
AT srinivasanalagarsamy analyticalplatformevaluationforquantificationoferginprostatecancerusingproteinandmrnadetectionmethods