Cargando…

Coverage of skin cancer and recreational tanning in North American magazines before and after the landmark 2006 International Agency for Research on Cancer report

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer is an increasingly important global public health problem. Mass media is a key source of skin cancer information. We examined how media coverage of skin cancer has changed over time as a consequence of the release of a key public health report from the International Agency fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McWhirter, Jennifer E, Hoffman-Goetz, Laurie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1511-1
_version_ 1782359334110363648
author McWhirter, Jennifer E
Hoffman-Goetz, Laurie
author_facet McWhirter, Jennifer E
Hoffman-Goetz, Laurie
author_sort McWhirter, Jennifer E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Skin cancer is an increasingly important global public health problem. Mass media is a key source of skin cancer information. We examined how media coverage of skin cancer has changed over time as a consequence of the release of a key public health report from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 2006, which linked ultraviolet (UV) radiation from indoor tanning and skin cancer. METHODS: A directed content analysis of skin cancer and tanning coverage in 29 popular North American magazines (2001–2012) examined reporting of skin cancer risk factors, UV behaviors, and early detection in article text (n = 761) and images (n = 1267). Chi-square and correlational analyses were used determine whether coverage changed in relation to the 2006 IARC report. RESULTS: The total volume of articles about skin cancer and tanning increased modestly after the IARC report (χ(2) = 4.57, df = 1, p < .05); however, key IARC report messages (e.g., avoid indoor tanning, UV as a risk factor) were no more likely to be reported after compared to before the report. There were virtually no changes in the percentage of coverage for both risk factors and early detection information over time. There were some changes in the percentage of coverage about UV behaviors after the IARC report, but these variables were not directly related to the report. Magazines were more likely to encourage sunscreen use (χ(2) = 11.55, df = 1, p < .01) and less likely to promote the tanned look as attractive (χ(2) = 9.72, df = 1, p < .01) after the IARC report. It also became less common for magazines to promote sun avoidance (χ(2) = 6.82, df = 1, p < .01) and use of sunless tanners (χ(2) = 7.46, df = 1, p < .01) after the report. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a modest increase in volume of coverage post-IARC report, key messages from the report were not taken up by the media. While there have been some improvements in magazine reporting, there is a need for more effective dissemination of public health messages about skin cancer and tanning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4342877
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43428772015-02-28 Coverage of skin cancer and recreational tanning in North American magazines before and after the landmark 2006 International Agency for Research on Cancer report McWhirter, Jennifer E Hoffman-Goetz, Laurie BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Skin cancer is an increasingly important global public health problem. Mass media is a key source of skin cancer information. We examined how media coverage of skin cancer has changed over time as a consequence of the release of a key public health report from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 2006, which linked ultraviolet (UV) radiation from indoor tanning and skin cancer. METHODS: A directed content analysis of skin cancer and tanning coverage in 29 popular North American magazines (2001–2012) examined reporting of skin cancer risk factors, UV behaviors, and early detection in article text (n = 761) and images (n = 1267). Chi-square and correlational analyses were used determine whether coverage changed in relation to the 2006 IARC report. RESULTS: The total volume of articles about skin cancer and tanning increased modestly after the IARC report (χ(2) = 4.57, df = 1, p < .05); however, key IARC report messages (e.g., avoid indoor tanning, UV as a risk factor) were no more likely to be reported after compared to before the report. There were virtually no changes in the percentage of coverage for both risk factors and early detection information over time. There were some changes in the percentage of coverage about UV behaviors after the IARC report, but these variables were not directly related to the report. Magazines were more likely to encourage sunscreen use (χ(2) = 11.55, df = 1, p < .01) and less likely to promote the tanned look as attractive (χ(2) = 9.72, df = 1, p < .01) after the IARC report. It also became less common for magazines to promote sun avoidance (χ(2) = 6.82, df = 1, p < .01) and use of sunless tanners (χ(2) = 7.46, df = 1, p < .01) after the report. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a modest increase in volume of coverage post-IARC report, key messages from the report were not taken up by the media. While there have been some improvements in magazine reporting, there is a need for more effective dissemination of public health messages about skin cancer and tanning. BioMed Central 2015-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4342877/ /pubmed/25884779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1511-1 Text en © McWhirter and Hoffman-Goetz; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McWhirter, Jennifer E
Hoffman-Goetz, Laurie
Coverage of skin cancer and recreational tanning in North American magazines before and after the landmark 2006 International Agency for Research on Cancer report
title Coverage of skin cancer and recreational tanning in North American magazines before and after the landmark 2006 International Agency for Research on Cancer report
title_full Coverage of skin cancer and recreational tanning in North American magazines before and after the landmark 2006 International Agency for Research on Cancer report
title_fullStr Coverage of skin cancer and recreational tanning in North American magazines before and after the landmark 2006 International Agency for Research on Cancer report
title_full_unstemmed Coverage of skin cancer and recreational tanning in North American magazines before and after the landmark 2006 International Agency for Research on Cancer report
title_short Coverage of skin cancer and recreational tanning in North American magazines before and after the landmark 2006 International Agency for Research on Cancer report
title_sort coverage of skin cancer and recreational tanning in north american magazines before and after the landmark 2006 international agency for research on cancer report
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4342877/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25884779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1511-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mcwhirterjennifere coverageofskincancerandrecreationaltanninginnorthamericanmagazinesbeforeandafterthelandmark2006internationalagencyforresearchoncancerreport
AT hoffmangoetzlaurie coverageofskincancerandrecreationaltanninginnorthamericanmagazinesbeforeandafterthelandmark2006internationalagencyforresearchoncancerreport