Cargando…
Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage
The DNA damage response (DDR) has two main goals, to repair the damaged DNA and to communicate the presence of damaged DNA. This communication allows the adaptation of cellular behavior to minimize the risk associated with DNA damage. In particular, cell cycle progression must be adapted after a DNA...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4343024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25774166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00063 |
_version_ | 1782359348726464512 |
---|---|
author | Jaiswal, Himjyot Lindqvist, Arne |
author_facet | Jaiswal, Himjyot Lindqvist, Arne |
author_sort | Jaiswal, Himjyot |
collection | PubMed |
description | The DNA damage response (DDR) has two main goals, to repair the damaged DNA and to communicate the presence of damaged DNA. This communication allows the adaptation of cellular behavior to minimize the risk associated with DNA damage. In particular, cell cycle progression must be adapted after a DNA-damaging insult, and cells either pause or terminally exit the cell cycle during a DDR. As cells can accumulate mutations after a DDR due to error-prone DNA repair, terminal cell cycle exit may prevent malignant transformation. The tumor suppressor p53 plays a key role in promoting terminal cell cycle exit. Interestingly, p53 has been implicated in communication of a stress response to surrounding cells, known as the bystander response. Recently, surrounding cells have also been shown to affect the damaged cell, suggesting the presence of intercellular feedback loops. How such feedback may affect terminal cell cycle exit remains unclear, but its presence calls for caution in evaluating cellular outcome without controlling the cellular surrounding. In addition, such feedback may contribute to how the cellular environment affects malignant transformation after DNA damage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4343024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43430242015-03-13 Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage Jaiswal, Himjyot Lindqvist, Arne Front Genet Oncology The DNA damage response (DDR) has two main goals, to repair the damaged DNA and to communicate the presence of damaged DNA. This communication allows the adaptation of cellular behavior to minimize the risk associated with DNA damage. In particular, cell cycle progression must be adapted after a DNA-damaging insult, and cells either pause or terminally exit the cell cycle during a DDR. As cells can accumulate mutations after a DDR due to error-prone DNA repair, terminal cell cycle exit may prevent malignant transformation. The tumor suppressor p53 plays a key role in promoting terminal cell cycle exit. Interestingly, p53 has been implicated in communication of a stress response to surrounding cells, known as the bystander response. Recently, surrounding cells have also been shown to affect the damaged cell, suggesting the presence of intercellular feedback loops. How such feedback may affect terminal cell cycle exit remains unclear, but its presence calls for caution in evaluating cellular outcome without controlling the cellular surrounding. In addition, such feedback may contribute to how the cellular environment affects malignant transformation after DNA damage. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4343024/ /pubmed/25774166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00063 Text en Copyright © 2015 Jaiswal and Lindqvist. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Jaiswal, Himjyot Lindqvist, Arne Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage |
title | Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage |
title_full | Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage |
title_fullStr | Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage |
title_full_unstemmed | Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage |
title_short | Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage |
title_sort | bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after dna damage |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4343024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25774166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00063 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaiswalhimjyot bystandercommunicationandcellcycledecisionsafterdnadamage AT lindqvistarne bystandercommunicationandcellcycledecisionsafterdnadamage |