Cargando…

Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage

The DNA damage response (DDR) has two main goals, to repair the damaged DNA and to communicate the presence of damaged DNA. This communication allows the adaptation of cellular behavior to minimize the risk associated with DNA damage. In particular, cell cycle progression must be adapted after a DNA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaiswal, Himjyot, Lindqvist, Arne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4343024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25774166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00063
_version_ 1782359348726464512
author Jaiswal, Himjyot
Lindqvist, Arne
author_facet Jaiswal, Himjyot
Lindqvist, Arne
author_sort Jaiswal, Himjyot
collection PubMed
description The DNA damage response (DDR) has two main goals, to repair the damaged DNA and to communicate the presence of damaged DNA. This communication allows the adaptation of cellular behavior to minimize the risk associated with DNA damage. In particular, cell cycle progression must be adapted after a DNA-damaging insult, and cells either pause or terminally exit the cell cycle during a DDR. As cells can accumulate mutations after a DDR due to error-prone DNA repair, terminal cell cycle exit may prevent malignant transformation. The tumor suppressor p53 plays a key role in promoting terminal cell cycle exit. Interestingly, p53 has been implicated in communication of a stress response to surrounding cells, known as the bystander response. Recently, surrounding cells have also been shown to affect the damaged cell, suggesting the presence of intercellular feedback loops. How such feedback may affect terminal cell cycle exit remains unclear, but its presence calls for caution in evaluating cellular outcome without controlling the cellular surrounding. In addition, such feedback may contribute to how the cellular environment affects malignant transformation after DNA damage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4343024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43430242015-03-13 Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage Jaiswal, Himjyot Lindqvist, Arne Front Genet Oncology The DNA damage response (DDR) has two main goals, to repair the damaged DNA and to communicate the presence of damaged DNA. This communication allows the adaptation of cellular behavior to minimize the risk associated with DNA damage. In particular, cell cycle progression must be adapted after a DNA-damaging insult, and cells either pause or terminally exit the cell cycle during a DDR. As cells can accumulate mutations after a DDR due to error-prone DNA repair, terminal cell cycle exit may prevent malignant transformation. The tumor suppressor p53 plays a key role in promoting terminal cell cycle exit. Interestingly, p53 has been implicated in communication of a stress response to surrounding cells, known as the bystander response. Recently, surrounding cells have also been shown to affect the damaged cell, suggesting the presence of intercellular feedback loops. How such feedback may affect terminal cell cycle exit remains unclear, but its presence calls for caution in evaluating cellular outcome without controlling the cellular surrounding. In addition, such feedback may contribute to how the cellular environment affects malignant transformation after DNA damage. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4343024/ /pubmed/25774166 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00063 Text en Copyright © 2015 Jaiswal and Lindqvist. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Jaiswal, Himjyot
Lindqvist, Arne
Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage
title Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage
title_full Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage
title_fullStr Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage
title_full_unstemmed Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage
title_short Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage
title_sort bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after dna damage
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4343024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25774166
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00063
work_keys_str_mv AT jaiswalhimjyot bystandercommunicationandcellcycledecisionsafterdnadamage
AT lindqvistarne bystandercommunicationandcellcycledecisionsafterdnadamage