Cargando…

Uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between Brazil, China and Thailand

OBJECTIVES: New antidiabetic medications such as insulin analogues and thiazolidinediones have been introduced over the last decade. This study compares the uptake of new agents in three emerging pharmaceutical markets: Brazil, China, and Thailand. METHODS: Using longitudinal IMS Health sales data,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Christine Y, Emmerick, Isabel Cristina M, Stephens, Peter, Ross-Degnan, Dennis, Wagner, Anita K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4343056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-014-0020-4
_version_ 1782359353538379776
author Lu, Christine Y
Emmerick, Isabel Cristina M
Stephens, Peter
Ross-Degnan, Dennis
Wagner, Anita K
author_facet Lu, Christine Y
Emmerick, Isabel Cristina M
Stephens, Peter
Ross-Degnan, Dennis
Wagner, Anita K
author_sort Lu, Christine Y
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: New antidiabetic medications such as insulin analogues and thiazolidinediones have been introduced over the last decade. This study compares the uptake of new agents in three emerging pharmaceutical markets: Brazil, China, and Thailand. METHODS: Using longitudinal IMS Health sales data, we calculated the quarterly percentage market share for types of insulins and oral hypoglycemic agents from 2002 through 2012 in each country. New oral hypoglycemic agents included: alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and non-sulfonylurea secretagogues. RESULTS: While China had the highest use of insulin cartridges and pens (85.6% in 2010), Brazil was the earliest adopter of insulin analogues and had the greatest use of these products overall (44.6% of the insulin market) in 2010, which then decreased by almost half by 2012. Together, sulfonylureas and metformin dominated the markets in Brazil and Thailand (~89% and ~96% respectively) over the 10-year period. Between 2002 and 2012, there was a shift in use from sulfonylureas to metformin; the market share of newer agents remained 10% or less in both countries. In China, however, market share of new oral agents grew rapidly from 13.1% to 44.4%. While metformin use was relatively stable in China (one-third of the market), sulfonylureas declined substantially over the 10-year period (41.5% to 20.8%). CONCLUSION: Given large cost differentials between newer and older insulins and among oral hypoglycemic agents, it is important to evaluate uptake of newer products over time. Uptake patterns differed in the study countries, likely due to different medicines policy approaches. Future research should evaluate how trends in use of antidiabetic products align with national clinical practice guidelines and pharmaceutical policies, as well as the impacts of different patterns of use on cost and clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4343056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43430562015-03-26 Uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between Brazil, China and Thailand Lu, Christine Y Emmerick, Isabel Cristina M Stephens, Peter Ross-Degnan, Dennis Wagner, Anita K J Pharm Policy Pract Research OBJECTIVES: New antidiabetic medications such as insulin analogues and thiazolidinediones have been introduced over the last decade. This study compares the uptake of new agents in three emerging pharmaceutical markets: Brazil, China, and Thailand. METHODS: Using longitudinal IMS Health sales data, we calculated the quarterly percentage market share for types of insulins and oral hypoglycemic agents from 2002 through 2012 in each country. New oral hypoglycemic agents included: alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and non-sulfonylurea secretagogues. RESULTS: While China had the highest use of insulin cartridges and pens (85.6% in 2010), Brazil was the earliest adopter of insulin analogues and had the greatest use of these products overall (44.6% of the insulin market) in 2010, which then decreased by almost half by 2012. Together, sulfonylureas and metformin dominated the markets in Brazil and Thailand (~89% and ~96% respectively) over the 10-year period. Between 2002 and 2012, there was a shift in use from sulfonylureas to metformin; the market share of newer agents remained 10% or less in both countries. In China, however, market share of new oral agents grew rapidly from 13.1% to 44.4%. While metformin use was relatively stable in China (one-third of the market), sulfonylureas declined substantially over the 10-year period (41.5% to 20.8%). CONCLUSION: Given large cost differentials between newer and older insulins and among oral hypoglycemic agents, it is important to evaluate uptake of newer products over time. Uptake patterns differed in the study countries, likely due to different medicines policy approaches. Future research should evaluate how trends in use of antidiabetic products align with national clinical practice guidelines and pharmaceutical policies, as well as the impacts of different patterns of use on cost and clinical outcomes. BioMed Central 2015-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4343056/ /pubmed/25815201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-014-0020-4 Text en © Lu et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Lu, Christine Y
Emmerick, Isabel Cristina M
Stephens, Peter
Ross-Degnan, Dennis
Wagner, Anita K
Uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between Brazil, China and Thailand
title Uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between Brazil, China and Thailand
title_full Uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between Brazil, China and Thailand
title_fullStr Uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between Brazil, China and Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between Brazil, China and Thailand
title_short Uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between Brazil, China and Thailand
title_sort uptake of new antidiabetic medications in three emerging markets: a comparison between brazil, china and thailand
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4343056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25815201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40545-014-0020-4
work_keys_str_mv AT luchristiney uptakeofnewantidiabeticmedicationsinthreeemergingmarketsacomparisonbetweenbrazilchinaandthailand
AT emmerickisabelcristinam uptakeofnewantidiabeticmedicationsinthreeemergingmarketsacomparisonbetweenbrazilchinaandthailand
AT stephenspeter uptakeofnewantidiabeticmedicationsinthreeemergingmarketsacomparisonbetweenbrazilchinaandthailand
AT rossdegnandennis uptakeofnewantidiabeticmedicationsinthreeemergingmarketsacomparisonbetweenbrazilchinaandthailand
AT wagneranitak uptakeofnewantidiabeticmedicationsinthreeemergingmarketsacomparisonbetweenbrazilchinaandthailand