Cargando…

In-Vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: A Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures

PURPOSE: To experimentally validate a non-linear finite element analysis (FEA) modeling approach assessing in-vitro fracture risk at the proximal femur and to transfer the method to standard in-vivo multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) data of the hip aiming to predict additional hip fracture r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liebl, Hans, Garcia, Eduardo Grande, Holzner, Fabian, Noel, Peter B., Burgkart, Rainer, Rummeny, Ernst J., Baum, Thomas, Bauer, Jan S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25723187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116907
_version_ 1782359405364248576
author Liebl, Hans
Garcia, Eduardo Grande
Holzner, Fabian
Noel, Peter B.
Burgkart, Rainer
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Baum, Thomas
Bauer, Jan S.
author_facet Liebl, Hans
Garcia, Eduardo Grande
Holzner, Fabian
Noel, Peter B.
Burgkart, Rainer
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Baum, Thomas
Bauer, Jan S.
author_sort Liebl, Hans
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To experimentally validate a non-linear finite element analysis (FEA) modeling approach assessing in-vitro fracture risk at the proximal femur and to transfer the method to standard in-vivo multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) data of the hip aiming to predict additional hip fracture risk in subjects with and without osteoporosis associated vertebral fractures using bone mineral density (BMD) measurements as gold standard. METHODS: One fresh-frozen human femur specimen was mechanically tested and fractured simulating stance and clinically relevant fall loading configurations to the hip. After experimental in-vitro validation, the FEA simulation protocol was transferred to standard contrast-enhanced in-vivo MDCT images to calculate individual hip fracture risk each for 4 subjects with and without a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures matched by age and gender. In addition, FEA based risk factor calculations were compared to manual femoral BMD measurements of all subjects. RESULTS: In-vitro simulations showed good correlation with the experimentally measured strains both in stance (R(2) = 0.963) and fall configuration (R(2) = 0.976). The simulated maximum stress overestimated the experimental failure load (4743 N) by 14.7% (5440 N) while the simulated maximum strain overestimated by 4.7% (4968 N). The simulated failed elements coincided precisely with the experimentally determined fracture locations. BMD measurements in subjects with a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures did not differ significantly from subjects without fragility fractures (femoral head: p = 0.989; femoral neck: p = 0.366), but showed higher FEA based risk factors for additional incident hip fractures (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: FEA simulations were successfully validated by elastic and destructive in-vitro experiments. In the subsequent in-vivo analyses, MDCT based FEA based risk factor differences for additional hip fractures were not mirrored by according BMD measurements. Our data suggests, that MDCT derived FEA models may assess bone strength more accurately than BMD measurements alone, providing a valuable in-vivo fracture risk assessment tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4344329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43443292015-03-04 In-Vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: A Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures Liebl, Hans Garcia, Eduardo Grande Holzner, Fabian Noel, Peter B. Burgkart, Rainer Rummeny, Ernst J. Baum, Thomas Bauer, Jan S. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To experimentally validate a non-linear finite element analysis (FEA) modeling approach assessing in-vitro fracture risk at the proximal femur and to transfer the method to standard in-vivo multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) data of the hip aiming to predict additional hip fracture risk in subjects with and without osteoporosis associated vertebral fractures using bone mineral density (BMD) measurements as gold standard. METHODS: One fresh-frozen human femur specimen was mechanically tested and fractured simulating stance and clinically relevant fall loading configurations to the hip. After experimental in-vitro validation, the FEA simulation protocol was transferred to standard contrast-enhanced in-vivo MDCT images to calculate individual hip fracture risk each for 4 subjects with and without a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures matched by age and gender. In addition, FEA based risk factor calculations were compared to manual femoral BMD measurements of all subjects. RESULTS: In-vitro simulations showed good correlation with the experimentally measured strains both in stance (R(2) = 0.963) and fall configuration (R(2) = 0.976). The simulated maximum stress overestimated the experimental failure load (4743 N) by 14.7% (5440 N) while the simulated maximum strain overestimated by 4.7% (4968 N). The simulated failed elements coincided precisely with the experimentally determined fracture locations. BMD measurements in subjects with a history of osteoporotic vertebral fractures did not differ significantly from subjects without fragility fractures (femoral head: p = 0.989; femoral neck: p = 0.366), but showed higher FEA based risk factors for additional incident hip fractures (p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: FEA simulations were successfully validated by elastic and destructive in-vitro experiments. In the subsequent in-vivo analyses, MDCT based FEA based risk factor differences for additional hip fractures were not mirrored by according BMD measurements. Our data suggests, that MDCT derived FEA models may assess bone strength more accurately than BMD measurements alone, providing a valuable in-vivo fracture risk assessment tool. Public Library of Science 2015-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4344329/ /pubmed/25723187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116907 Text en © 2015 Liebl et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liebl, Hans
Garcia, Eduardo Grande
Holzner, Fabian
Noel, Peter B.
Burgkart, Rainer
Rummeny, Ernst J.
Baum, Thomas
Bauer, Jan S.
In-Vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: A Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures
title In-Vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: A Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures
title_full In-Vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: A Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures
title_fullStr In-Vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: A Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures
title_full_unstemmed In-Vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: A Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures
title_short In-Vivo Assessment of Femoral Bone Strength Using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) Based on Routine MDCT Imaging: A Preliminary Study on Patients with Vertebral Fractures
title_sort in-vivo assessment of femoral bone strength using finite element analysis (fea) based on routine mdct imaging: a preliminary study on patients with vertebral fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25723187
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116907
work_keys_str_mv AT lieblhans invivoassessmentoffemoralbonestrengthusingfiniteelementanalysisfeabasedonroutinemdctimagingapreliminarystudyonpatientswithvertebralfractures
AT garciaeduardogrande invivoassessmentoffemoralbonestrengthusingfiniteelementanalysisfeabasedonroutinemdctimagingapreliminarystudyonpatientswithvertebralfractures
AT holznerfabian invivoassessmentoffemoralbonestrengthusingfiniteelementanalysisfeabasedonroutinemdctimagingapreliminarystudyonpatientswithvertebralfractures
AT noelpeterb invivoassessmentoffemoralbonestrengthusingfiniteelementanalysisfeabasedonroutinemdctimagingapreliminarystudyonpatientswithvertebralfractures
AT burgkartrainer invivoassessmentoffemoralbonestrengthusingfiniteelementanalysisfeabasedonroutinemdctimagingapreliminarystudyonpatientswithvertebralfractures
AT rummenyernstj invivoassessmentoffemoralbonestrengthusingfiniteelementanalysisfeabasedonroutinemdctimagingapreliminarystudyonpatientswithvertebralfractures
AT baumthomas invivoassessmentoffemoralbonestrengthusingfiniteelementanalysisfeabasedonroutinemdctimagingapreliminarystudyonpatientswithvertebralfractures
AT bauerjans invivoassessmentoffemoralbonestrengthusingfiniteelementanalysisfeabasedonroutinemdctimagingapreliminarystudyonpatientswithvertebralfractures