Cargando…

Non-Invasive Tools for the Diagnosis of Potentially Life-Threatening Gynaecological Emergencies: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE: To identify non-invasive tools for diagnosis of the major potentially life-threatening gynaecological emergencies (G-PLEs) reported in previous studies, and to assess their diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: MEDLINE; EMBASE; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polena, Viola, Huchon, Cyrille, Varas Ramos, Catalina, Rouzier, Roman, Dumont, Alexandre, Fauconnier, Arnaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25723401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114189
_version_ 1782359407011561472
author Polena, Viola
Huchon, Cyrille
Varas Ramos, Catalina
Rouzier, Roman
Dumont, Alexandre
Fauconnier, Arnaud
author_facet Polena, Viola
Huchon, Cyrille
Varas Ramos, Catalina
Rouzier, Roman
Dumont, Alexandre
Fauconnier, Arnaud
author_sort Polena, Viola
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify non-invasive tools for diagnosis of the major potentially life-threatening gynaecological emergencies (G-PLEs) reported in previous studies, and to assess their diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: MEDLINE; EMBASE; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library) were searched to identify all eligible studies published in English or French between January 1990 and December 2012. Studies were considered eligible if they were primary diagnostic studies of any designs, with a gold standard and with sufficient information for construction of a 2 × 2 contingency table, concerning at least one of the following G-PLEs: complicated ectopic pregnancy, complicated pelvic inflammatory disease, adnexal torsion and haemoperitoneum of any gynaecological origin. Extraction of data and assessment of study quality were conducted by two independent reviewers. We set the thresholds for the diagnostic value of signs retrieved at Sensibility ≥ 95% and LR—≤ 0.25, or Specificity ≥ 90% and LR+ ≥ 4. RESULTS: We identified 8288 reports of diagnostic studies for the selected G-PLEs, 45 of which met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally low. The most common diagnostic tools evaluated were transvaginal ultrasound (20/45), followed by medical history (18/45), clinical examination (15/45) and laboratory tests (14/45). Standardised questioning about symptoms, systolic blood pressure<110 mmHg, shock index>0.85, identification of a mass by abdominal palpation or vaginal examination, haemoglobin concentration <10 g/dl and six ultrasound and Doppler signs presented high performances for the diagnosis of G-PLEs. Transvaginal ultrasound was the diagnostic tool with the best individual performance for the diagnosis of all G-PLEs. CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that blood pressure measurement, haemoglobin tests and transvaginal ultrasound are cornerstone examinations for the diagnosis of G-PLEs that should be available in all gynaecological emergency care services. Standardised questioning about symptoms could be used for triage of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4344336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43443362015-03-04 Non-Invasive Tools for the Diagnosis of Potentially Life-Threatening Gynaecological Emergencies: A Systematic Review Polena, Viola Huchon, Cyrille Varas Ramos, Catalina Rouzier, Roman Dumont, Alexandre Fauconnier, Arnaud PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To identify non-invasive tools for diagnosis of the major potentially life-threatening gynaecological emergencies (G-PLEs) reported in previous studies, and to assess their diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: MEDLINE; EMBASE; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library) were searched to identify all eligible studies published in English or French between January 1990 and December 2012. Studies were considered eligible if they were primary diagnostic studies of any designs, with a gold standard and with sufficient information for construction of a 2 × 2 contingency table, concerning at least one of the following G-PLEs: complicated ectopic pregnancy, complicated pelvic inflammatory disease, adnexal torsion and haemoperitoneum of any gynaecological origin. Extraction of data and assessment of study quality were conducted by two independent reviewers. We set the thresholds for the diagnostic value of signs retrieved at Sensibility ≥ 95% and LR—≤ 0.25, or Specificity ≥ 90% and LR+ ≥ 4. RESULTS: We identified 8288 reports of diagnostic studies for the selected G-PLEs, 45 of which met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the included studies was generally low. The most common diagnostic tools evaluated were transvaginal ultrasound (20/45), followed by medical history (18/45), clinical examination (15/45) and laboratory tests (14/45). Standardised questioning about symptoms, systolic blood pressure<110 mmHg, shock index>0.85, identification of a mass by abdominal palpation or vaginal examination, haemoglobin concentration <10 g/dl and six ultrasound and Doppler signs presented high performances for the diagnosis of G-PLEs. Transvaginal ultrasound was the diagnostic tool with the best individual performance for the diagnosis of all G-PLEs. CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that blood pressure measurement, haemoglobin tests and transvaginal ultrasound are cornerstone examinations for the diagnosis of G-PLEs that should be available in all gynaecological emergency care services. Standardised questioning about symptoms could be used for triage of patients. Public Library of Science 2015-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4344336/ /pubmed/25723401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114189 Text en © 2015 Polena et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Polena, Viola
Huchon, Cyrille
Varas Ramos, Catalina
Rouzier, Roman
Dumont, Alexandre
Fauconnier, Arnaud
Non-Invasive Tools for the Diagnosis of Potentially Life-Threatening Gynaecological Emergencies: A Systematic Review
title Non-Invasive Tools for the Diagnosis of Potentially Life-Threatening Gynaecological Emergencies: A Systematic Review
title_full Non-Invasive Tools for the Diagnosis of Potentially Life-Threatening Gynaecological Emergencies: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Non-Invasive Tools for the Diagnosis of Potentially Life-Threatening Gynaecological Emergencies: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Non-Invasive Tools for the Diagnosis of Potentially Life-Threatening Gynaecological Emergencies: A Systematic Review
title_short Non-Invasive Tools for the Diagnosis of Potentially Life-Threatening Gynaecological Emergencies: A Systematic Review
title_sort non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of potentially life-threatening gynaecological emergencies: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25723401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114189
work_keys_str_mv AT polenaviola noninvasivetoolsforthediagnosisofpotentiallylifethreateninggynaecologicalemergenciesasystematicreview
AT huchoncyrille noninvasivetoolsforthediagnosisofpotentiallylifethreateninggynaecologicalemergenciesasystematicreview
AT varasramoscatalina noninvasivetoolsforthediagnosisofpotentiallylifethreateninggynaecologicalemergenciesasystematicreview
AT rouzierroman noninvasivetoolsforthediagnosisofpotentiallylifethreateninggynaecologicalemergenciesasystematicreview
AT dumontalexandre noninvasivetoolsforthediagnosisofpotentiallylifethreateninggynaecologicalemergenciesasystematicreview
AT fauconnierarnaud noninvasivetoolsforthediagnosisofpotentiallylifethreateninggynaecologicalemergenciesasystematicreview