Cargando…

The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score

Adult diet quality indices are shown to predict nutritional adequacy of dietary intake as well as all-cause morbidity and mortality. This study describes the reproducibility and validity of a food-based diet quality index, the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). ARFS was developed to reflect a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, Clare E., Burrows, Tracy L., Rollo, Megan E., Boggess, May M., Watson, Jane F., Guest, Maya, Duncanson, Kerith, Pezdirc, Kristine, Hutchesson, Melinda J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25625814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7020785
_version_ 1782359437433896960
author Collins, Clare E.
Burrows, Tracy L.
Rollo, Megan E.
Boggess, May M.
Watson, Jane F.
Guest, Maya
Duncanson, Kerith
Pezdirc, Kristine
Hutchesson, Melinda J.
author_facet Collins, Clare E.
Burrows, Tracy L.
Rollo, Megan E.
Boggess, May M.
Watson, Jane F.
Guest, Maya
Duncanson, Kerith
Pezdirc, Kristine
Hutchesson, Melinda J.
author_sort Collins, Clare E.
collection PubMed
description Adult diet quality indices are shown to predict nutritional adequacy of dietary intake as well as all-cause morbidity and mortality. This study describes the reproducibility and validity of a food-based diet quality index, the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). ARFS was developed to reflect alignment with the Australian Dietary Guidelines and is modelled on the US Recommended Food Score. Dietary intakes of 96 adult participants (31 male, 65 female) age 30 to 75 years were assessed in two rounds, five months apart. Diet was assessed using a 120-question semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The ARFS diet quality index was derived using a subset of 70 items from the full FFQ. Reproducibility of the ARFS between round one and round two was confirmed by the overall intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87 (95% CI 0.83, 0.90), which compared favourably to that for the FFQ at 0.85 (95% CI 0.80, 0.89). ARFS was correlated with FFQ nutrient intakes, particularly fiber, vitamin A, beta-carotene and vitamin C (0.53, 95% CI 0.37–0.67), and with mineral intakes, particularly calcium, magnesium and potassium (0.32, 95% CI 0.23–0.40). ARFS is a suitable brief tool to evaluate diet quality in adults and reliably estimates a range of nutrient intakes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4344560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43445602015-03-18 The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score Collins, Clare E. Burrows, Tracy L. Rollo, Megan E. Boggess, May M. Watson, Jane F. Guest, Maya Duncanson, Kerith Pezdirc, Kristine Hutchesson, Melinda J. Nutrients Article Adult diet quality indices are shown to predict nutritional adequacy of dietary intake as well as all-cause morbidity and mortality. This study describes the reproducibility and validity of a food-based diet quality index, the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). ARFS was developed to reflect alignment with the Australian Dietary Guidelines and is modelled on the US Recommended Food Score. Dietary intakes of 96 adult participants (31 male, 65 female) age 30 to 75 years were assessed in two rounds, five months apart. Diet was assessed using a 120-question semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The ARFS diet quality index was derived using a subset of 70 items from the full FFQ. Reproducibility of the ARFS between round one and round two was confirmed by the overall intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87 (95% CI 0.83, 0.90), which compared favourably to that for the FFQ at 0.85 (95% CI 0.80, 0.89). ARFS was correlated with FFQ nutrient intakes, particularly fiber, vitamin A, beta-carotene and vitamin C (0.53, 95% CI 0.37–0.67), and with mineral intakes, particularly calcium, magnesium and potassium (0.32, 95% CI 0.23–0.40). ARFS is a suitable brief tool to evaluate diet quality in adults and reliably estimates a range of nutrient intakes. MDPI 2015-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4344560/ /pubmed/25625814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7020785 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Collins, Clare E.
Burrows, Tracy L.
Rollo, Megan E.
Boggess, May M.
Watson, Jane F.
Guest, Maya
Duncanson, Kerith
Pezdirc, Kristine
Hutchesson, Melinda J.
The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score
title The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score
title_full The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score
title_fullStr The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score
title_full_unstemmed The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score
title_short The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score
title_sort comparative validity and reproducibility of a diet quality index for adults: the australian recommended food score
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25625814
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7020785
work_keys_str_mv AT collinsclaree thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT burrowstracyl thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT rollomegane thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT boggessmaym thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT watsonjanef thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT guestmaya thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT duncansonkerith thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT pezdirckristine thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT hutchessonmelindaj thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT collinsclaree comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT burrowstracyl comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT rollomegane comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT boggessmaym comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT watsonjanef comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT guestmaya comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT duncansonkerith comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT pezdirckristine comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore
AT hutchessonmelindaj comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore