Cargando…
The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score
Adult diet quality indices are shown to predict nutritional adequacy of dietary intake as well as all-cause morbidity and mortality. This study describes the reproducibility and validity of a food-based diet quality index, the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). ARFS was developed to reflect a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25625814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7020785 |
_version_ | 1782359437433896960 |
---|---|
author | Collins, Clare E. Burrows, Tracy L. Rollo, Megan E. Boggess, May M. Watson, Jane F. Guest, Maya Duncanson, Kerith Pezdirc, Kristine Hutchesson, Melinda J. |
author_facet | Collins, Clare E. Burrows, Tracy L. Rollo, Megan E. Boggess, May M. Watson, Jane F. Guest, Maya Duncanson, Kerith Pezdirc, Kristine Hutchesson, Melinda J. |
author_sort | Collins, Clare E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adult diet quality indices are shown to predict nutritional adequacy of dietary intake as well as all-cause morbidity and mortality. This study describes the reproducibility and validity of a food-based diet quality index, the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). ARFS was developed to reflect alignment with the Australian Dietary Guidelines and is modelled on the US Recommended Food Score. Dietary intakes of 96 adult participants (31 male, 65 female) age 30 to 75 years were assessed in two rounds, five months apart. Diet was assessed using a 120-question semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The ARFS diet quality index was derived using a subset of 70 items from the full FFQ. Reproducibility of the ARFS between round one and round two was confirmed by the overall intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87 (95% CI 0.83, 0.90), which compared favourably to that for the FFQ at 0.85 (95% CI 0.80, 0.89). ARFS was correlated with FFQ nutrient intakes, particularly fiber, vitamin A, beta-carotene and vitamin C (0.53, 95% CI 0.37–0.67), and with mineral intakes, particularly calcium, magnesium and potassium (0.32, 95% CI 0.23–0.40). ARFS is a suitable brief tool to evaluate diet quality in adults and reliably estimates a range of nutrient intakes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4344560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43445602015-03-18 The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score Collins, Clare E. Burrows, Tracy L. Rollo, Megan E. Boggess, May M. Watson, Jane F. Guest, Maya Duncanson, Kerith Pezdirc, Kristine Hutchesson, Melinda J. Nutrients Article Adult diet quality indices are shown to predict nutritional adequacy of dietary intake as well as all-cause morbidity and mortality. This study describes the reproducibility and validity of a food-based diet quality index, the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). ARFS was developed to reflect alignment with the Australian Dietary Guidelines and is modelled on the US Recommended Food Score. Dietary intakes of 96 adult participants (31 male, 65 female) age 30 to 75 years were assessed in two rounds, five months apart. Diet was assessed using a 120-question semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The ARFS diet quality index was derived using a subset of 70 items from the full FFQ. Reproducibility of the ARFS between round one and round two was confirmed by the overall intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.87 (95% CI 0.83, 0.90), which compared favourably to that for the FFQ at 0.85 (95% CI 0.80, 0.89). ARFS was correlated with FFQ nutrient intakes, particularly fiber, vitamin A, beta-carotene and vitamin C (0.53, 95% CI 0.37–0.67), and with mineral intakes, particularly calcium, magnesium and potassium (0.32, 95% CI 0.23–0.40). ARFS is a suitable brief tool to evaluate diet quality in adults and reliably estimates a range of nutrient intakes. MDPI 2015-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4344560/ /pubmed/25625814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7020785 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Collins, Clare E. Burrows, Tracy L. Rollo, Megan E. Boggess, May M. Watson, Jane F. Guest, Maya Duncanson, Kerith Pezdirc, Kristine Hutchesson, Melinda J. The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score |
title | The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score |
title_full | The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score |
title_fullStr | The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score |
title_full_unstemmed | The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score |
title_short | The Comparative Validity and Reproducibility of a Diet Quality Index for Adults: The Australian Recommended Food Score |
title_sort | comparative validity and reproducibility of a diet quality index for adults: the australian recommended food score |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25625814 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu7020785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT collinsclaree thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT burrowstracyl thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT rollomegane thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT boggessmaym thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT watsonjanef thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT guestmaya thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT duncansonkerith thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT pezdirckristine thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT hutchessonmelindaj thecomparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT collinsclaree comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT burrowstracyl comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT rollomegane comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT boggessmaym comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT watsonjanef comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT guestmaya comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT duncansonkerith comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT pezdirckristine comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore AT hutchessonmelindaj comparativevalidityandreproducibilityofadietqualityindexforadultstheaustralianrecommendedfoodscore |