Cargando…

Determinants of Exposure to Fragranced Product Chemical Mixtures in a Sample of Twins

Fragranced product chemical mixtures may be relevant for environmental health, but little is known about exposure. We analyzed results from an olfactory challenge with the synthetic musk fragrance 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethyl-cyclopento-γ-2-benzopyran (HHCB), and a questionnaire abou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gribble, Matthew O., Bandeen-Roche, Karen, Fox, Mary A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25633034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120201466
_version_ 1782359463441727488
author Gribble, Matthew O.
Bandeen-Roche, Karen
Fox, Mary A.
author_facet Gribble, Matthew O.
Bandeen-Roche, Karen
Fox, Mary A.
author_sort Gribble, Matthew O.
collection PubMed
description Fragranced product chemical mixtures may be relevant for environmental health, but little is known about exposure. We analyzed results from an olfactory challenge with the synthetic musk fragrance 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethyl-cyclopento-γ-2-benzopyran (HHCB), and a questionnaire about attitudes toward chemical safety and use of fragranced products, in a sample of 140 white and 17 black twin pairs attending a festival in Ohio. Data for each product were analyzed using robust ordered logistic regressions with random intercepts for “twin pair” and “sharing address with twin”, and fixed effects for sex, age, education, and “ever being bothered by fragrances”. Due to the small number of black participants, models were restricted to white participants except when examining racial differences. Overall patterns of association were summarized across product-types through random-effects meta-analysis. Principal components analysis was used to summarize clustering of product use. The dominant axis of variability in fragranced product use was “more vs. less”, followed by a distinction between household cleaning products and personal care products. Overall, males used fragranced products less frequently than females (adjusted proportionate odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.33, 0.93). This disparity was driven by personal care products (0.42, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.96), rather than household cleaning products (0.79, 95% CI: 0.49, 1.25) and was particularly evident for body lotion (0.12, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.27). Overall usage differed by age (0.64, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.95) but only hand soap and shampoo products differed significantly. “Ever being bothered by fragrance” had no overall association (0.92, 95% CI: 0.65, 1.30) but was associated with laundry detergent use (0.46, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.93). Similarly, black vs. white differences on average were not significant (1.34, 95% CI: 0.55, 3.28) but there were apparent differences in use of shampoo (0.01, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.69), body lotion (4.67, 95% CI: 1.18, 18.47), and perfume (6.22, 95% CI:1.08, 35.89). There was no overall association with thinking about product risks (0.90, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.02), nor with inability to smell HHCB (0.84, 95% CI: 0.63, 1.12). Exposure to fragranced products may differ demographically. The relevance for health disparities should be studied.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4344677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43446772015-03-18 Determinants of Exposure to Fragranced Product Chemical Mixtures in a Sample of Twins Gribble, Matthew O. Bandeen-Roche, Karen Fox, Mary A. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Fragranced product chemical mixtures may be relevant for environmental health, but little is known about exposure. We analyzed results from an olfactory challenge with the synthetic musk fragrance 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethyl-cyclopento-γ-2-benzopyran (HHCB), and a questionnaire about attitudes toward chemical safety and use of fragranced products, in a sample of 140 white and 17 black twin pairs attending a festival in Ohio. Data for each product were analyzed using robust ordered logistic regressions with random intercepts for “twin pair” and “sharing address with twin”, and fixed effects for sex, age, education, and “ever being bothered by fragrances”. Due to the small number of black participants, models were restricted to white participants except when examining racial differences. Overall patterns of association were summarized across product-types through random-effects meta-analysis. Principal components analysis was used to summarize clustering of product use. The dominant axis of variability in fragranced product use was “more vs. less”, followed by a distinction between household cleaning products and personal care products. Overall, males used fragranced products less frequently than females (adjusted proportionate odds ratio 0.55, 95% confidence interval 0.33, 0.93). This disparity was driven by personal care products (0.42, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.96), rather than household cleaning products (0.79, 95% CI: 0.49, 1.25) and was particularly evident for body lotion (0.12, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.27). Overall usage differed by age (0.64, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.95) but only hand soap and shampoo products differed significantly. “Ever being bothered by fragrance” had no overall association (0.92, 95% CI: 0.65, 1.30) but was associated with laundry detergent use (0.46, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.93). Similarly, black vs. white differences on average were not significant (1.34, 95% CI: 0.55, 3.28) but there were apparent differences in use of shampoo (0.01, 95% CI: 0.00, 0.69), body lotion (4.67, 95% CI: 1.18, 18.47), and perfume (6.22, 95% CI:1.08, 35.89). There was no overall association with thinking about product risks (0.90, 95% CI: 0.79, 1.02), nor with inability to smell HHCB (0.84, 95% CI: 0.63, 1.12). Exposure to fragranced products may differ demographically. The relevance for health disparities should be studied. MDPI 2015-01-27 2015-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4344677/ /pubmed/25633034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120201466 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gribble, Matthew O.
Bandeen-Roche, Karen
Fox, Mary A.
Determinants of Exposure to Fragranced Product Chemical Mixtures in a Sample of Twins
title Determinants of Exposure to Fragranced Product Chemical Mixtures in a Sample of Twins
title_full Determinants of Exposure to Fragranced Product Chemical Mixtures in a Sample of Twins
title_fullStr Determinants of Exposure to Fragranced Product Chemical Mixtures in a Sample of Twins
title_full_unstemmed Determinants of Exposure to Fragranced Product Chemical Mixtures in a Sample of Twins
title_short Determinants of Exposure to Fragranced Product Chemical Mixtures in a Sample of Twins
title_sort determinants of exposure to fragranced product chemical mixtures in a sample of twins
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4344677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25633034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120201466
work_keys_str_mv AT gribblematthewo determinantsofexposuretofragrancedproductchemicalmixturesinasampleoftwins
AT bandeenrochekaren determinantsofexposuretofragrancedproductchemicalmixturesinasampleoftwins
AT foxmarya determinantsofexposuretofragrancedproductchemicalmixturesinasampleoftwins