Cargando…

Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems

BACKGROUND: In plants, RNA silencing plays a fundamental role as defence mechanism against viruses. During last years deep-sequencing technology has allowed to analyze the sRNA profile of a large variety of virus-infected tissues. Nevertheless, the majority of these studies have been restricted to a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herranz, Mari Carmen, Navarro, Jose Antonio, Sommen, Evelien, Pallas, Vicente
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25765188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1327-5
_version_ 1782359512352555008
author Herranz, Mari Carmen
Navarro, Jose Antonio
Sommen, Evelien
Pallas, Vicente
author_facet Herranz, Mari Carmen
Navarro, Jose Antonio
Sommen, Evelien
Pallas, Vicente
author_sort Herranz, Mari Carmen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In plants, RNA silencing plays a fundamental role as defence mechanism against viruses. During last years deep-sequencing technology has allowed to analyze the sRNA profile of a large variety of virus-infected tissues. Nevertheless, the majority of these studies have been restricted to a unique tissue and no comparative analysis between phloem and source/sink tissues has been conducted. In the present work, we compared the sRNA populations of source, sink and conductive (phloem) tissues in two different plant virus pathosystems. We chose two cucurbit species infected with two viruses very different in genome organization and replication strategy; Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV) and Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV). RESULTS: Our findings showed, in both systems, an increase of the 21-nt total sRNAs together with a decrease of those with a size of 24-nt in all the infected tissues, except for the phloem where the ratio of 21/24-nt sRNA species remained constant. Comparing the vsRNAs, both PNRSV- and MNSV-infected plants share the same vsRNA size distribution in all the analyzed tissues. Similar accumulation levels of sense and antisense vsRNAs were observed in both systems except for roots that showed a prevalence of (+) vsRNAs in both pathosystems. Additionally, the presence of overrepresented discrete sites along the viral genome, hot spots, were identified and validated by stem-loop RT-PCR. Despite that in PNRSV-infected plants the presence of vsRNAs was scarce both viruses modulated the host sRNA profile. CONCLUSIONS: We compare for the first time the sRNA profile of four different tissues, including source, sink and conductive (phloem) tissues, in two plant-virus pathosystems. Our results indicate that antiviral silencing machinery in melon and cucumber acts mainly through DCL4. Upon infection, the total sRNA pattern in phloem remains unchanged in contrast to the rest of the analyzed tissues indicating a certain tissue-tropism to this polulation. Independently of the accumulation level of the vsRNAs both viruses were able to modulate the host sRNA pattern. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1327-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4345012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43450122015-03-02 Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems Herranz, Mari Carmen Navarro, Jose Antonio Sommen, Evelien Pallas, Vicente BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: In plants, RNA silencing plays a fundamental role as defence mechanism against viruses. During last years deep-sequencing technology has allowed to analyze the sRNA profile of a large variety of virus-infected tissues. Nevertheless, the majority of these studies have been restricted to a unique tissue and no comparative analysis between phloem and source/sink tissues has been conducted. In the present work, we compared the sRNA populations of source, sink and conductive (phloem) tissues in two different plant virus pathosystems. We chose two cucurbit species infected with two viruses very different in genome organization and replication strategy; Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV) and Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV). RESULTS: Our findings showed, in both systems, an increase of the 21-nt total sRNAs together with a decrease of those with a size of 24-nt in all the infected tissues, except for the phloem where the ratio of 21/24-nt sRNA species remained constant. Comparing the vsRNAs, both PNRSV- and MNSV-infected plants share the same vsRNA size distribution in all the analyzed tissues. Similar accumulation levels of sense and antisense vsRNAs were observed in both systems except for roots that showed a prevalence of (+) vsRNAs in both pathosystems. Additionally, the presence of overrepresented discrete sites along the viral genome, hot spots, were identified and validated by stem-loop RT-PCR. Despite that in PNRSV-infected plants the presence of vsRNAs was scarce both viruses modulated the host sRNA profile. CONCLUSIONS: We compare for the first time the sRNA profile of four different tissues, including source, sink and conductive (phloem) tissues, in two plant-virus pathosystems. Our results indicate that antiviral silencing machinery in melon and cucumber acts mainly through DCL4. Upon infection, the total sRNA pattern in phloem remains unchanged in contrast to the rest of the analyzed tissues indicating a certain tissue-tropism to this polulation. Independently of the accumulation level of the vsRNAs both viruses were able to modulate the host sRNA pattern. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1327-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4345012/ /pubmed/25765188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1327-5 Text en © Herranz et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Herranz, Mari Carmen
Navarro, Jose Antonio
Sommen, Evelien
Pallas, Vicente
Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems
title Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems
title_full Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems
title_fullStr Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems
title_short Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems
title_sort comparative analysis among the small rna populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25765188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1327-5
work_keys_str_mv AT herranzmaricarmen comparativeanalysisamongthesmallrnapopulationsofsourcesinkandconductivetissuesintwodifferentplantviruspathosystems
AT navarrojoseantonio comparativeanalysisamongthesmallrnapopulationsofsourcesinkandconductivetissuesintwodifferentplantviruspathosystems
AT sommenevelien comparativeanalysisamongthesmallrnapopulationsofsourcesinkandconductivetissuesintwodifferentplantviruspathosystems
AT pallasvicente comparativeanalysisamongthesmallrnapopulationsofsourcesinkandconductivetissuesintwodifferentplantviruspathosystems