Cargando…
Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems
BACKGROUND: In plants, RNA silencing plays a fundamental role as defence mechanism against viruses. During last years deep-sequencing technology has allowed to analyze the sRNA profile of a large variety of virus-infected tissues. Nevertheless, the majority of these studies have been restricted to a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25765188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1327-5 |
_version_ | 1782359512352555008 |
---|---|
author | Herranz, Mari Carmen Navarro, Jose Antonio Sommen, Evelien Pallas, Vicente |
author_facet | Herranz, Mari Carmen Navarro, Jose Antonio Sommen, Evelien Pallas, Vicente |
author_sort | Herranz, Mari Carmen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In plants, RNA silencing plays a fundamental role as defence mechanism against viruses. During last years deep-sequencing technology has allowed to analyze the sRNA profile of a large variety of virus-infected tissues. Nevertheless, the majority of these studies have been restricted to a unique tissue and no comparative analysis between phloem and source/sink tissues has been conducted. In the present work, we compared the sRNA populations of source, sink and conductive (phloem) tissues in two different plant virus pathosystems. We chose two cucurbit species infected with two viruses very different in genome organization and replication strategy; Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV) and Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV). RESULTS: Our findings showed, in both systems, an increase of the 21-nt total sRNAs together with a decrease of those with a size of 24-nt in all the infected tissues, except for the phloem where the ratio of 21/24-nt sRNA species remained constant. Comparing the vsRNAs, both PNRSV- and MNSV-infected plants share the same vsRNA size distribution in all the analyzed tissues. Similar accumulation levels of sense and antisense vsRNAs were observed in both systems except for roots that showed a prevalence of (+) vsRNAs in both pathosystems. Additionally, the presence of overrepresented discrete sites along the viral genome, hot spots, were identified and validated by stem-loop RT-PCR. Despite that in PNRSV-infected plants the presence of vsRNAs was scarce both viruses modulated the host sRNA profile. CONCLUSIONS: We compare for the first time the sRNA profile of four different tissues, including source, sink and conductive (phloem) tissues, in two plant-virus pathosystems. Our results indicate that antiviral silencing machinery in melon and cucumber acts mainly through DCL4. Upon infection, the total sRNA pattern in phloem remains unchanged in contrast to the rest of the analyzed tissues indicating a certain tissue-tropism to this polulation. Independently of the accumulation level of the vsRNAs both viruses were able to modulate the host sRNA pattern. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1327-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4345012 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43450122015-03-02 Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems Herranz, Mari Carmen Navarro, Jose Antonio Sommen, Evelien Pallas, Vicente BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: In plants, RNA silencing plays a fundamental role as defence mechanism against viruses. During last years deep-sequencing technology has allowed to analyze the sRNA profile of a large variety of virus-infected tissues. Nevertheless, the majority of these studies have been restricted to a unique tissue and no comparative analysis between phloem and source/sink tissues has been conducted. In the present work, we compared the sRNA populations of source, sink and conductive (phloem) tissues in two different plant virus pathosystems. We chose two cucurbit species infected with two viruses very different in genome organization and replication strategy; Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV) and Prunus necrotic ringspot virus (PNRSV). RESULTS: Our findings showed, in both systems, an increase of the 21-nt total sRNAs together with a decrease of those with a size of 24-nt in all the infected tissues, except for the phloem where the ratio of 21/24-nt sRNA species remained constant. Comparing the vsRNAs, both PNRSV- and MNSV-infected plants share the same vsRNA size distribution in all the analyzed tissues. Similar accumulation levels of sense and antisense vsRNAs were observed in both systems except for roots that showed a prevalence of (+) vsRNAs in both pathosystems. Additionally, the presence of overrepresented discrete sites along the viral genome, hot spots, were identified and validated by stem-loop RT-PCR. Despite that in PNRSV-infected plants the presence of vsRNAs was scarce both viruses modulated the host sRNA profile. CONCLUSIONS: We compare for the first time the sRNA profile of four different tissues, including source, sink and conductive (phloem) tissues, in two plant-virus pathosystems. Our results indicate that antiviral silencing machinery in melon and cucumber acts mainly through DCL4. Upon infection, the total sRNA pattern in phloem remains unchanged in contrast to the rest of the analyzed tissues indicating a certain tissue-tropism to this polulation. Independently of the accumulation level of the vsRNAs both viruses were able to modulate the host sRNA pattern. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1327-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4345012/ /pubmed/25765188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1327-5 Text en © Herranz et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Herranz, Mari Carmen Navarro, Jose Antonio Sommen, Evelien Pallas, Vicente Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems |
title | Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems |
title_full | Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems |
title_short | Comparative analysis among the small RNA populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems |
title_sort | comparative analysis among the small rna populations of source, sink and conductive tissues in two different plant-virus pathosystems |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345012/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25765188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1327-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herranzmaricarmen comparativeanalysisamongthesmallrnapopulationsofsourcesinkandconductivetissuesintwodifferentplantviruspathosystems AT navarrojoseantonio comparativeanalysisamongthesmallrnapopulationsofsourcesinkandconductivetissuesintwodifferentplantviruspathosystems AT sommenevelien comparativeanalysisamongthesmallrnapopulationsofsourcesinkandconductivetissuesintwodifferentplantviruspathosystems AT pallasvicente comparativeanalysisamongthesmallrnapopulationsofsourcesinkandconductivetissuesintwodifferentplantviruspathosystems |