Cargando…

Adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) interventions designed to prevent prenatal complications have focused on increasing moderate PA yielding conflicting results. Minimal attention has focused on the evaluation of sleep, sedentary behavior (SB), light activity or total daily PA during pregnancy. The p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Fabio, Diana R, Blomme, Courtney K, Smith, Katie M, Welk, Gregory J, Campbell, Christina G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0191-7
_version_ 1782359515112407040
author Di Fabio, Diana R
Blomme, Courtney K
Smith, Katie M
Welk, Gregory J
Campbell, Christina G
author_facet Di Fabio, Diana R
Blomme, Courtney K
Smith, Katie M
Welk, Gregory J
Campbell, Christina G
author_sort Di Fabio, Diana R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) interventions designed to prevent prenatal complications have focused on increasing moderate PA yielding conflicting results. Minimal attention has focused on the evaluation of sleep, sedentary behavior (SB), light activity or total daily PA during pregnancy. The purpose of this prospective, longitudinal study was to 1) objectively quantify and compare habitual PA and SB during the 2(nd) and 3(rd) trimester; and 2) evaluate differences in activity patterns for women meeting prenatal PA guidelines versus those that did not. METHODS: Forty-six participants wore 2 PA monitors (SenseWear® Mini and activPAL™) during week 18 and week 35 of pregnancy. We compared differences in sleep duration, postural allocation, daily steps, and PA between the 2(nd) and 3(rd) trimester and for women who met and did not meet PA guidelines. RESULTS: During the 2(nd) trimester, 30% of the women’s day (24-hours) was total sleep; 52% SB; 13% light; 3% moderate; and 0% vigorous PA. Light (P = 0.05), vigorous (P = 0.02), and moderate-vigorous PA (MET-minutes; P = 0.02), decreased with a trend in increased SB (P = 0.07). Activity of other intensities and sleep duration did not significantly change. Only 39% and 37% of participants slept between 7–9 hours/night at week 18 and 35, respectively. Forty-six percent (n = 21) and 28% (n = 13) of participants met prenatal PA guidelines during the 2(nd) and 3(rd) trimester, respectively. At week 18, no differences in total sleep, SB, or light PA existed for women who met PA guidelines versus those who did not; total PA was significantly greater for women who met guidelines. At week 35, women that met PA guidelines had significantly less SB (P < 0.005) than women who did not. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pregnant women spend the majority of their day in SB. Significant reductions in total activity across pregnancy may be attributed, in part to shifts in light PA and increased SB. Based on the lifestyle of our sample, regardless of meeting PA guidelines in mid-pregnancy, no significant difference exists in time spent in SB, however meeting PA recommendations in late pregnancy may reduce SB. Future interventions should target reducing SB by increasing light and moderate PA beyond volitional exercise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4345024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43450242015-03-02 Adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study Di Fabio, Diana R Blomme, Courtney K Smith, Katie M Welk, Gregory J Campbell, Christina G Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) interventions designed to prevent prenatal complications have focused on increasing moderate PA yielding conflicting results. Minimal attention has focused on the evaluation of sleep, sedentary behavior (SB), light activity or total daily PA during pregnancy. The purpose of this prospective, longitudinal study was to 1) objectively quantify and compare habitual PA and SB during the 2(nd) and 3(rd) trimester; and 2) evaluate differences in activity patterns for women meeting prenatal PA guidelines versus those that did not. METHODS: Forty-six participants wore 2 PA monitors (SenseWear® Mini and activPAL™) during week 18 and week 35 of pregnancy. We compared differences in sleep duration, postural allocation, daily steps, and PA between the 2(nd) and 3(rd) trimester and for women who met and did not meet PA guidelines. RESULTS: During the 2(nd) trimester, 30% of the women’s day (24-hours) was total sleep; 52% SB; 13% light; 3% moderate; and 0% vigorous PA. Light (P = 0.05), vigorous (P = 0.02), and moderate-vigorous PA (MET-minutes; P = 0.02), decreased with a trend in increased SB (P = 0.07). Activity of other intensities and sleep duration did not significantly change. Only 39% and 37% of participants slept between 7–9 hours/night at week 18 and 35, respectively. Forty-six percent (n = 21) and 28% (n = 13) of participants met prenatal PA guidelines during the 2(nd) and 3(rd) trimester, respectively. At week 18, no differences in total sleep, SB, or light PA existed for women who met PA guidelines versus those who did not; total PA was significantly greater for women who met guidelines. At week 35, women that met PA guidelines had significantly less SB (P < 0.005) than women who did not. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pregnant women spend the majority of their day in SB. Significant reductions in total activity across pregnancy may be attributed, in part to shifts in light PA and increased SB. Based on the lifestyle of our sample, regardless of meeting PA guidelines in mid-pregnancy, no significant difference exists in time spent in SB, however meeting PA recommendations in late pregnancy may reduce SB. Future interventions should target reducing SB by increasing light and moderate PA beyond volitional exercise. BioMed Central 2015-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4345024/ /pubmed/25879428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0191-7 Text en © Di Fabio et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Di Fabio, Diana R
Blomme, Courtney K
Smith, Katie M
Welk, Gregory J
Campbell, Christina G
Adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study
title Adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study
title_full Adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study
title_fullStr Adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study
title_short Adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study
title_sort adherence to physical activity guidelines in mid-pregnancy does not reduce sedentary time: an observational study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25879428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0191-7
work_keys_str_mv AT difabiodianar adherencetophysicalactivityguidelinesinmidpregnancydoesnotreducesedentarytimeanobservationalstudy
AT blommecourtneyk adherencetophysicalactivityguidelinesinmidpregnancydoesnotreducesedentarytimeanobservationalstudy
AT smithkatiem adherencetophysicalactivityguidelinesinmidpregnancydoesnotreducesedentarytimeanobservationalstudy
AT welkgregoryj adherencetophysicalactivityguidelinesinmidpregnancydoesnotreducesedentarytimeanobservationalstudy
AT campbellchristinag adherencetophysicalactivityguidelinesinmidpregnancydoesnotreducesedentarytimeanobservationalstudy