Cargando…

The Current Testing Protocols for Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Implants in Laboratory Setting: A Review of the Literature

In vitro biomechanical investigations have become a routinely employed technique to explore new lumbar instrumentation. One of the most important advantages of such investigations is the low risk present when compared to clinical trials. However, the best use of any experimental data can be made whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonzalez-Blohm, Sabrina A., Doulgeris, James J., Lee, William E., Shea, Thomas M., Aghayev, Kamran, Vrionis, Frank D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/506181
_version_ 1782359524837949440
author Gonzalez-Blohm, Sabrina A.
Doulgeris, James J.
Lee, William E.
Shea, Thomas M.
Aghayev, Kamran
Vrionis, Frank D.
author_facet Gonzalez-Blohm, Sabrina A.
Doulgeris, James J.
Lee, William E.
Shea, Thomas M.
Aghayev, Kamran
Vrionis, Frank D.
author_sort Gonzalez-Blohm, Sabrina A.
collection PubMed
description In vitro biomechanical investigations have become a routinely employed technique to explore new lumbar instrumentation. One of the most important advantages of such investigations is the low risk present when compared to clinical trials. However, the best use of any experimental data can be made when standard testing protocols are adopted by investigators, thus allowing comparisons among studies. Experimental variables, such as the length of the specimen, operative level, type of loading (e.g., dynamic versus quasistatic), magnitude, and rate of load applied, are among the most common variables controlled during spinal biomechanical testing. Although important efforts have been made to standardize these protocols, high variability can be found in the current literature. The aim of this investigation was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify the current trends in the protocols reported for the evaluation of new lumbar spinal implants under laboratory setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4345069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43450692015-03-17 The Current Testing Protocols for Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Implants in Laboratory Setting: A Review of the Literature Gonzalez-Blohm, Sabrina A. Doulgeris, James J. Lee, William E. Shea, Thomas M. Aghayev, Kamran Vrionis, Frank D. Biomed Res Int Review Article In vitro biomechanical investigations have become a routinely employed technique to explore new lumbar instrumentation. One of the most important advantages of such investigations is the low risk present when compared to clinical trials. However, the best use of any experimental data can be made when standard testing protocols are adopted by investigators, thus allowing comparisons among studies. Experimental variables, such as the length of the specimen, operative level, type of loading (e.g., dynamic versus quasistatic), magnitude, and rate of load applied, are among the most common variables controlled during spinal biomechanical testing. Although important efforts have been made to standardize these protocols, high variability can be found in the current literature. The aim of this investigation was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to identify the current trends in the protocols reported for the evaluation of new lumbar spinal implants under laboratory setting. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4345069/ /pubmed/25785272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/506181 Text en Copyright © 2015 Sabrina A. Gonzalez-Blohm et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Gonzalez-Blohm, Sabrina A.
Doulgeris, James J.
Lee, William E.
Shea, Thomas M.
Aghayev, Kamran
Vrionis, Frank D.
The Current Testing Protocols for Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Implants in Laboratory Setting: A Review of the Literature
title The Current Testing Protocols for Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Implants in Laboratory Setting: A Review of the Literature
title_full The Current Testing Protocols for Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Implants in Laboratory Setting: A Review of the Literature
title_fullStr The Current Testing Protocols for Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Implants in Laboratory Setting: A Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed The Current Testing Protocols for Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Implants in Laboratory Setting: A Review of the Literature
title_short The Current Testing Protocols for Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Implants in Laboratory Setting: A Review of the Literature
title_sort current testing protocols for biomechanical evaluation of lumbar spinal implants in laboratory setting: a review of the literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/506181
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezblohmsabrinaa thecurrenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT doulgerisjamesj thecurrenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT leewilliame thecurrenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT sheathomasm thecurrenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT aghayevkamran thecurrenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT vrionisfrankd thecurrenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT gonzalezblohmsabrinaa currenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT doulgerisjamesj currenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT leewilliame currenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT sheathomasm currenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT aghayevkamran currenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature
AT vrionisfrankd currenttestingprotocolsforbiomechanicalevaluationoflumbarspinalimplantsinlaboratorysettingareviewoftheliterature