Cargando…

Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature

The relationship between use of an intrauterine device (IUD) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been studied extensively over the past 50 years. Previous research has led to considerable controversy and debate. Numerous limitations in the studies make it difficult to draw any firm conclusions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hubacher, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25673543
_version_ 1782359622377537536
author Hubacher, David
author_facet Hubacher, David
author_sort Hubacher, David
collection PubMed
description The relationship between use of an intrauterine device (IUD) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been studied extensively over the past 50 years. Previous research has led to considerable controversy and debate. Numerous limitations in the studies make it difficult to draw any firm conclusions from the past research or to design new approaches to study the topic. The main research barriers include uncertainty of infection/diagnoses, and inappropriate comparison groups for IUD users. Natural history studies of the aetiology of disease and observational research among IUD users suggest that the risk of PID is very low. Research linking previous IUD use to the more distant endpoint of tubal infertility reveals that the risks may be even lower than the risks of PID.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4345753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43457532015-03-05 Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature Hubacher, David Indian J Med Res Review Article The relationship between use of an intrauterine device (IUD) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been studied extensively over the past 50 years. Previous research has led to considerable controversy and debate. Numerous limitations in the studies make it difficult to draw any firm conclusions from the past research or to design new approaches to study the topic. The main research barriers include uncertainty of infection/diagnoses, and inappropriate comparison groups for IUD users. Natural history studies of the aetiology of disease and observational research among IUD users suggest that the risk of PID is very low. Research linking previous IUD use to the more distant endpoint of tubal infertility reveals that the risks may be even lower than the risks of PID. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4345753/ /pubmed/25673543 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hubacher, David
Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature
title Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature
title_full Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature
title_fullStr Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature
title_short Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature
title_sort intrauterine devices & infection: review of the literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25673543
work_keys_str_mv AT hubacherdavid intrauterinedevicesinfectionreviewoftheliterature