Cargando…
Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature
The relationship between use of an intrauterine device (IUD) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been studied extensively over the past 50 years. Previous research has led to considerable controversy and debate. Numerous limitations in the studies make it difficult to draw any firm conclusions...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25673543 |
_version_ | 1782359622377537536 |
---|---|
author | Hubacher, David |
author_facet | Hubacher, David |
author_sort | Hubacher, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | The relationship between use of an intrauterine device (IUD) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been studied extensively over the past 50 years. Previous research has led to considerable controversy and debate. Numerous limitations in the studies make it difficult to draw any firm conclusions from the past research or to design new approaches to study the topic. The main research barriers include uncertainty of infection/diagnoses, and inappropriate comparison groups for IUD users. Natural history studies of the aetiology of disease and observational research among IUD users suggest that the risk of PID is very low. Research linking previous IUD use to the more distant endpoint of tubal infertility reveals that the risks may be even lower than the risks of PID. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4345753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43457532015-03-05 Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature Hubacher, David Indian J Med Res Review Article The relationship between use of an intrauterine device (IUD) and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) has been studied extensively over the past 50 years. Previous research has led to considerable controversy and debate. Numerous limitations in the studies make it difficult to draw any firm conclusions from the past research or to design new approaches to study the topic. The main research barriers include uncertainty of infection/diagnoses, and inappropriate comparison groups for IUD users. Natural history studies of the aetiology of disease and observational research among IUD users suggest that the risk of PID is very low. Research linking previous IUD use to the more distant endpoint of tubal infertility reveals that the risks may be even lower than the risks of PID. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4345753/ /pubmed/25673543 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Medical Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hubacher, David Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature |
title | Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature |
title_full | Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature |
title_short | Intrauterine devices & infection: Review of the literature |
title_sort | intrauterine devices & infection: review of the literature |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25673543 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hubacherdavid intrauterinedevicesinfectionreviewoftheliterature |