Cargando…
Demystifying theory and its use in improvement
The role and value of theory in improvement work in healthcare has been seriously underrecognised. We join others in proposing that more informed use of theory can strengthen improvement programmes and facilitate the evaluation of their effectiveness. Many professionals, including improvement practi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25616279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627 |
_version_ | 1782359664749445120 |
---|---|
author | Davidoff, Frank Dixon-Woods, Mary Leviton, Laura Michie, Susan |
author_facet | Davidoff, Frank Dixon-Woods, Mary Leviton, Laura Michie, Susan |
author_sort | Davidoff, Frank |
collection | PubMed |
description | The role and value of theory in improvement work in healthcare has been seriously underrecognised. We join others in proposing that more informed use of theory can strengthen improvement programmes and facilitate the evaluation of their effectiveness. Many professionals, including improvement practitioners, are unfortunately mystified—and alienated—by theory, which discourages them from using it in their work. In an effort to demystify theory we make the point in this paper that, far from being discretionary or superfluous, theory (‘reason-giving’), both informal and formal, is intimately woven into virtually all human endeavour. We explore the special characteristics of grand, mid-range and programme theory; consider the consequences of misusing theory or failing to use it; review the process of developing and applying programme theory; examine some emerging criteria of ‘good’ theory; and emphasise the value, as well as the challenge, of combining informal experience-based theory with formal, publicly developed theory. We conclude that although informal theory is always at work in improvement, practitioners are often not aware of it or do not make it explicit. The germane issue for improvement practitioners, therefore, is not whether they use theory but whether they make explicit the particular theory or theories, informal and formal, they actually use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4345989 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43459892015-03-18 Demystifying theory and its use in improvement Davidoff, Frank Dixon-Woods, Mary Leviton, Laura Michie, Susan BMJ Qual Saf Research and Reporting Methodology The role and value of theory in improvement work in healthcare has been seriously underrecognised. We join others in proposing that more informed use of theory can strengthen improvement programmes and facilitate the evaluation of their effectiveness. Many professionals, including improvement practitioners, are unfortunately mystified—and alienated—by theory, which discourages them from using it in their work. In an effort to demystify theory we make the point in this paper that, far from being discretionary or superfluous, theory (‘reason-giving’), both informal and formal, is intimately woven into virtually all human endeavour. We explore the special characteristics of grand, mid-range and programme theory; consider the consequences of misusing theory or failing to use it; review the process of developing and applying programme theory; examine some emerging criteria of ‘good’ theory; and emphasise the value, as well as the challenge, of combining informal experience-based theory with formal, publicly developed theory. We conclude that although informal theory is always at work in improvement, practitioners are often not aware of it or do not make it explicit. The germane issue for improvement practitioners, therefore, is not whether they use theory but whether they make explicit the particular theory or theories, informal and formal, they actually use. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-03 2015-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4345989/ /pubmed/25616279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research and Reporting Methodology Davidoff, Frank Dixon-Woods, Mary Leviton, Laura Michie, Susan Demystifying theory and its use in improvement |
title | Demystifying theory and its use in improvement |
title_full | Demystifying theory and its use in improvement |
title_fullStr | Demystifying theory and its use in improvement |
title_full_unstemmed | Demystifying theory and its use in improvement |
title_short | Demystifying theory and its use in improvement |
title_sort | demystifying theory and its use in improvement |
topic | Research and Reporting Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4345989/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25616279 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidofffrank demystifyingtheoryanditsuseinimprovement AT dixonwoodsmary demystifyingtheoryanditsuseinimprovement AT levitonlaura demystifyingtheoryanditsuseinimprovement AT michiesusan demystifyingtheoryanditsuseinimprovement |