Cargando…

Accuracy and Reproducibility of Right Ventricular Quantification in Patients with Pressure and Volume Overload Using Single-Beat Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

BACKGROUND: The right ventricle is a complex structure that is challenging to quantify by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. Unlike disk summation three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography (3DE), single-beat 3DE can acquire large volumes at high volume rates in one cardiac cycle, avoiding stitchin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knight, Daniel S., Grasso, Agata E., Quail, Michael A., Muthurangu, Vivek, Taylor, Andrew M., Toumpanakis, Christos, Caplin, Martyn E., Coghlan, J. Gerry, Davar, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mosby-Year Book 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4346278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25499839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.012
_version_ 1782359697430413312
author Knight, Daniel S.
Grasso, Agata E.
Quail, Michael A.
Muthurangu, Vivek
Taylor, Andrew M.
Toumpanakis, Christos
Caplin, Martyn E.
Coghlan, J. Gerry
Davar, Joseph
author_facet Knight, Daniel S.
Grasso, Agata E.
Quail, Michael A.
Muthurangu, Vivek
Taylor, Andrew M.
Toumpanakis, Christos
Caplin, Martyn E.
Coghlan, J. Gerry
Davar, Joseph
author_sort Knight, Daniel S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The right ventricle is a complex structure that is challenging to quantify by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. Unlike disk summation three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography (3DE), single-beat 3DE can acquire large volumes at high volume rates in one cardiac cycle, avoiding stitching artifacts or long breath-holds. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and test-retest reproducibility of single-beat 3DE for quantifying right ventricular (RV) volumes in adult populations of acquired RV pressure or volume overload, namely, pulmonary hypertension (PH) and carcinoid heart disease, respectively. Three-dimensional and 2D echocardiographic indices were also compared for identifying RV dysfunction in PH. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in 100 individuals who underwent 2D echocardiography, 3DE, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: 49 patients with PH, 20 with carcinoid heart disease, 11 with metastatic carcinoid tumors without cardiac involvement, and 20 healthy volunteers. Two operators performed test-retest acquisition and postprocessing for inter- and intraobserver reproducibility in 20 subjects. RESULTS: RV single-beat 3DE was attainable in 96% of cases, with mean volume rates of 32 to 45 volumes/sec. Bland-Altman analysis of all subjects (presented as mean bias ± 95% limits of agreement) revealed good agreement for end-diastolic volume (−2.3 ± 27.4 mL) and end-systolic volume (5.2 ± 19.0 mL) measured by 3DE and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, with a tendency to underestimate stroke volume (−7.5 ± 23.6 mL) and ejection fraction (−4.6 ± 13.8%) by 3DE. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a greater bias for volumetric underestimation, particularly in healthy volunteers (end-diastolic volume, −11.9 ± 18.0 mL; stroke volume, −11.2 ± 20.2 mL). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that 3DE-derived ejection fraction was significantly superior to 2D echocardiographic parameters for identifying RV dysfunction in PH (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 88%; area under the curve, 0.95; P = .031). There was significant interobserver test-retest bias for RV volume underestimation (end-diastolic volume, −12.5 ± 28.1 mL; stroke volume, −10.6 ± 23.2 mL). CONCLUSIONS: Single-beat 3DE is feasible and clinically applicable for volumetric quantification in acquired RV pressure or volume overload. It has improved limits of agreement compared with previous disk summation 3D echocardiographic studies and has incremental value over standard 2D echocardiographic measures for identifying RV dysfunction. Despite the ability to obtain and postprocess a full-volume 3D echocardiographic RV data set, the quality of the raw data did influence the accuracy of the data obtained. The technique performs better with dilated rather than nondilated RV cavities, with a learning curve that might affect the test-retest reproducibility for serial RV studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4346278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Mosby-Year Book
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43462782015-03-07 Accuracy and Reproducibility of Right Ventricular Quantification in Patients with Pressure and Volume Overload Using Single-Beat Three-Dimensional Echocardiography Knight, Daniel S. Grasso, Agata E. Quail, Michael A. Muthurangu, Vivek Taylor, Andrew M. Toumpanakis, Christos Caplin, Martyn E. Coghlan, J. Gerry Davar, Joseph J Am Soc Echocardiogr Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: The right ventricle is a complex structure that is challenging to quantify by two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. Unlike disk summation three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography (3DE), single-beat 3DE can acquire large volumes at high volume rates in one cardiac cycle, avoiding stitching artifacts or long breath-holds. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and test-retest reproducibility of single-beat 3DE for quantifying right ventricular (RV) volumes in adult populations of acquired RV pressure or volume overload, namely, pulmonary hypertension (PH) and carcinoid heart disease, respectively. Three-dimensional and 2D echocardiographic indices were also compared for identifying RV dysfunction in PH. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in 100 individuals who underwent 2D echocardiography, 3DE, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: 49 patients with PH, 20 with carcinoid heart disease, 11 with metastatic carcinoid tumors without cardiac involvement, and 20 healthy volunteers. Two operators performed test-retest acquisition and postprocessing for inter- and intraobserver reproducibility in 20 subjects. RESULTS: RV single-beat 3DE was attainable in 96% of cases, with mean volume rates of 32 to 45 volumes/sec. Bland-Altman analysis of all subjects (presented as mean bias ± 95% limits of agreement) revealed good agreement for end-diastolic volume (−2.3 ± 27.4 mL) and end-systolic volume (5.2 ± 19.0 mL) measured by 3DE and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, with a tendency to underestimate stroke volume (−7.5 ± 23.6 mL) and ejection fraction (−4.6 ± 13.8%) by 3DE. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a greater bias for volumetric underestimation, particularly in healthy volunteers (end-diastolic volume, −11.9 ± 18.0 mL; stroke volume, −11.2 ± 20.2 mL). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that 3DE-derived ejection fraction was significantly superior to 2D echocardiographic parameters for identifying RV dysfunction in PH (sensitivity, 94%; specificity, 88%; area under the curve, 0.95; P = .031). There was significant interobserver test-retest bias for RV volume underestimation (end-diastolic volume, −12.5 ± 28.1 mL; stroke volume, −10.6 ± 23.2 mL). CONCLUSIONS: Single-beat 3DE is feasible and clinically applicable for volumetric quantification in acquired RV pressure or volume overload. It has improved limits of agreement compared with previous disk summation 3D echocardiographic studies and has incremental value over standard 2D echocardiographic measures for identifying RV dysfunction. Despite the ability to obtain and postprocess a full-volume 3D echocardiographic RV data set, the quality of the raw data did influence the accuracy of the data obtained. The technique performs better with dilated rather than nondilated RV cavities, with a learning curve that might affect the test-retest reproducibility for serial RV studies. Mosby-Year Book 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4346278/ /pubmed/25499839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.012 Text en © 2015 by the American Society of Echocardiography. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Knight, Daniel S.
Grasso, Agata E.
Quail, Michael A.
Muthurangu, Vivek
Taylor, Andrew M.
Toumpanakis, Christos
Caplin, Martyn E.
Coghlan, J. Gerry
Davar, Joseph
Accuracy and Reproducibility of Right Ventricular Quantification in Patients with Pressure and Volume Overload Using Single-Beat Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
title Accuracy and Reproducibility of Right Ventricular Quantification in Patients with Pressure and Volume Overload Using Single-Beat Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
title_full Accuracy and Reproducibility of Right Ventricular Quantification in Patients with Pressure and Volume Overload Using Single-Beat Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
title_fullStr Accuracy and Reproducibility of Right Ventricular Quantification in Patients with Pressure and Volume Overload Using Single-Beat Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and Reproducibility of Right Ventricular Quantification in Patients with Pressure and Volume Overload Using Single-Beat Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
title_short Accuracy and Reproducibility of Right Ventricular Quantification in Patients with Pressure and Volume Overload Using Single-Beat Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
title_sort accuracy and reproducibility of right ventricular quantification in patients with pressure and volume overload using single-beat three-dimensional echocardiography
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4346278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25499839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.012
work_keys_str_mv AT knightdaniels accuracyandreproducibilityofrightventricularquantificationinpatientswithpressureandvolumeoverloadusingsinglebeatthreedimensionalechocardiography
AT grassoagatae accuracyandreproducibilityofrightventricularquantificationinpatientswithpressureandvolumeoverloadusingsinglebeatthreedimensionalechocardiography
AT quailmichaela accuracyandreproducibilityofrightventricularquantificationinpatientswithpressureandvolumeoverloadusingsinglebeatthreedimensionalechocardiography
AT muthuranguvivek accuracyandreproducibilityofrightventricularquantificationinpatientswithpressureandvolumeoverloadusingsinglebeatthreedimensionalechocardiography
AT taylorandrewm accuracyandreproducibilityofrightventricularquantificationinpatientswithpressureandvolumeoverloadusingsinglebeatthreedimensionalechocardiography
AT toumpanakischristos accuracyandreproducibilityofrightventricularquantificationinpatientswithpressureandvolumeoverloadusingsinglebeatthreedimensionalechocardiography
AT caplinmartyne accuracyandreproducibilityofrightventricularquantificationinpatientswithpressureandvolumeoverloadusingsinglebeatthreedimensionalechocardiography
AT coghlanjgerry accuracyandreproducibilityofrightventricularquantificationinpatientswithpressureandvolumeoverloadusingsinglebeatthreedimensionalechocardiography
AT davarjoseph accuracyandreproducibilityofrightventricularquantificationinpatientswithpressureandvolumeoverloadusingsinglebeatthreedimensionalechocardiography