Cargando…

Attentional Switches and Dual-Task Interference

In four experiments, we studied the time course of interference between detection of an oddball orientation target (OT) in an 8-item circular search display, and identification of a letter target (LT) in a central stream of distractor letters. Dual-task performance for different temporal lags betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ettwig, Janne F., Bronkhorst, Adelbert W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4346395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25730112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118216
_version_ 1782359705135349760
author Ettwig, Janne F.
Bronkhorst, Adelbert W.
author_facet Ettwig, Janne F.
Bronkhorst, Adelbert W.
author_sort Ettwig, Janne F.
collection PubMed
description In four experiments, we studied the time course of interference between detection of an oddball orientation target (OT) in an 8-item circular search display, and identification of a letter target (LT) in a central stream of distractor letters. Dual-task performance for different temporal lags between targets was compared to single-task performance. When the LT preceded the OT, dual-task performance levels were reduced at short inter-target intervals of 0 and 166 ms; when the OT preceded the LT, the dual-task interference was unexpectedly stronger and lasted for up to 500 ms. Resource competition due to temporally overlapping target processing cannot account for this result, because the feature search task is easier than the letter identification task, and therefore would have generated less interference when presented first. Two alternative explanations were explored. First, by manipulating the spatial inter-target distance, we investigated to what degree there is a penalty associated with directing the attentional window from a large object (the search display) to a smaller object (the central letter stream). Second, by varying the duration of the OT and subsequent mask, we studied whether the interference was caused by the difficulty of disengaging attention from the search display. Results support this second explanation and thus indicate that switching attention to the letter stream is hampered by the continuing presence of (masked) search display items. This result shows that attentional effects may play a major role in dual-task execution and can easily obscure interference due to other factors such as resource competition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4346395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43463952015-03-17 Attentional Switches and Dual-Task Interference Ettwig, Janne F. Bronkhorst, Adelbert W. PLoS One Research Article In four experiments, we studied the time course of interference between detection of an oddball orientation target (OT) in an 8-item circular search display, and identification of a letter target (LT) in a central stream of distractor letters. Dual-task performance for different temporal lags between targets was compared to single-task performance. When the LT preceded the OT, dual-task performance levels were reduced at short inter-target intervals of 0 and 166 ms; when the OT preceded the LT, the dual-task interference was unexpectedly stronger and lasted for up to 500 ms. Resource competition due to temporally overlapping target processing cannot account for this result, because the feature search task is easier than the letter identification task, and therefore would have generated less interference when presented first. Two alternative explanations were explored. First, by manipulating the spatial inter-target distance, we investigated to what degree there is a penalty associated with directing the attentional window from a large object (the search display) to a smaller object (the central letter stream). Second, by varying the duration of the OT and subsequent mask, we studied whether the interference was caused by the difficulty of disengaging attention from the search display. Results support this second explanation and thus indicate that switching attention to the letter stream is hampered by the continuing presence of (masked) search display items. This result shows that attentional effects may play a major role in dual-task execution and can easily obscure interference due to other factors such as resource competition. Public Library of Science 2015-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4346395/ /pubmed/25730112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118216 Text en © 2015 Ettwig, Bronkhorst http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ettwig, Janne F.
Bronkhorst, Adelbert W.
Attentional Switches and Dual-Task Interference
title Attentional Switches and Dual-Task Interference
title_full Attentional Switches and Dual-Task Interference
title_fullStr Attentional Switches and Dual-Task Interference
title_full_unstemmed Attentional Switches and Dual-Task Interference
title_short Attentional Switches and Dual-Task Interference
title_sort attentional switches and dual-task interference
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4346395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25730112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118216
work_keys_str_mv AT ettwigjannef attentionalswitchesanddualtaskinterference
AT bronkhorstadelbertw attentionalswitchesanddualtaskinterference