Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analyses of self-harm strategies aimed at reducing the mortality of pesticide self-poisonings in Sri Lanka: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION: An estimated 803 900 people worldwide died as a result of self-harm in 2012. The deliberate ingestion of pesticides has been identified as the method most frequently used to commit fatal self-harm globally. In Sri Lanka, it is estimated that up to 60% of all suicides are committed usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madsen, Lizell Bustamante, Eddleston, Michael, Hansen, Kristian Schultz, Pearson, Melissa, Agampodi, Suneth, Jayamanne, Shaluka, Konradsen, Flemming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4346671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25724984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007333
_version_ 1782359725282689024
author Madsen, Lizell Bustamante
Eddleston, Michael
Hansen, Kristian Schultz
Pearson, Melissa
Agampodi, Suneth
Jayamanne, Shaluka
Konradsen, Flemming
author_facet Madsen, Lizell Bustamante
Eddleston, Michael
Hansen, Kristian Schultz
Pearson, Melissa
Agampodi, Suneth
Jayamanne, Shaluka
Konradsen, Flemming
author_sort Madsen, Lizell Bustamante
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: An estimated 803 900 people worldwide died as a result of self-harm in 2012. The deliberate ingestion of pesticides has been identified as the method most frequently used to commit fatal self-harm globally. In Sri Lanka, it is estimated that up to 60% of all suicides are committed using this method. The aim of the present study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of an ongoing safe storage intervention currently taking place in a rural Sri Lankan district and to model the cost-effectiveness of implementing the safe storage intervention as well as four potential interventions (legislative, medical management, follow-up contact and mobile phone contact) on a national level. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Study design for all the strategies is a cost-effectiveness analysis. A governmental perspective is adopted. The time horizon for tracking the associated costs and health outcomes of the safe storage intervention on district level runs over 3 years. The time horizon is extended to 5 years when modelling a full national roll-out of the respective interventions. The discounting of costs and health outcomes are undertaken at the recommended real rate of 3%. Threshold analyses of the modelled strategies are employed to assess the strategies potential for cost-effectiveness, running scenarios with health outcome improvements ranging from 1% to 100%. Sensitivity analyses are also performed. The main outcome measures of the safe storage intervention are incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted for the safe storage project from the University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, in March of 2008. An amendment for the present study was granted from Rajarata University of Sri Lanka in November of 2013. Findings will be disseminated to public and private stakeholders in local and national government in Sri Lanka as well as the wider academic audience through peer-reviewed publications and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The safe storage cluster trial is registered with the Clinical Trials, ref: NCT1146496 (http://clinicaltrialsfeeds.org/clinical-trials/show/NCT1146496).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4346671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43466712015-03-05 Cost-effectiveness analyses of self-harm strategies aimed at reducing the mortality of pesticide self-poisonings in Sri Lanka: a study protocol Madsen, Lizell Bustamante Eddleston, Michael Hansen, Kristian Schultz Pearson, Melissa Agampodi, Suneth Jayamanne, Shaluka Konradsen, Flemming BMJ Open Global Health INTRODUCTION: An estimated 803 900 people worldwide died as a result of self-harm in 2012. The deliberate ingestion of pesticides has been identified as the method most frequently used to commit fatal self-harm globally. In Sri Lanka, it is estimated that up to 60% of all suicides are committed using this method. The aim of the present study is to assess the cost-effectiveness of an ongoing safe storage intervention currently taking place in a rural Sri Lankan district and to model the cost-effectiveness of implementing the safe storage intervention as well as four potential interventions (legislative, medical management, follow-up contact and mobile phone contact) on a national level. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Study design for all the strategies is a cost-effectiveness analysis. A governmental perspective is adopted. The time horizon for tracking the associated costs and health outcomes of the safe storage intervention on district level runs over 3 years. The time horizon is extended to 5 years when modelling a full national roll-out of the respective interventions. The discounting of costs and health outcomes are undertaken at the recommended real rate of 3%. Threshold analyses of the modelled strategies are employed to assess the strategies potential for cost-effectiveness, running scenarios with health outcome improvements ranging from 1% to 100%. Sensitivity analyses are also performed. The main outcome measures of the safe storage intervention are incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted for the safe storage project from the University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, in March of 2008. An amendment for the present study was granted from Rajarata University of Sri Lanka in November of 2013. Findings will be disseminated to public and private stakeholders in local and national government in Sri Lanka as well as the wider academic audience through peer-reviewed publications and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The safe storage cluster trial is registered with the Clinical Trials, ref: NCT1146496 (http://clinicaltrialsfeeds.org/clinical-trials/show/NCT1146496). BMJ Publishing Group 2015-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4346671/ /pubmed/25724984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007333 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Global Health
Madsen, Lizell Bustamante
Eddleston, Michael
Hansen, Kristian Schultz
Pearson, Melissa
Agampodi, Suneth
Jayamanne, Shaluka
Konradsen, Flemming
Cost-effectiveness analyses of self-harm strategies aimed at reducing the mortality of pesticide self-poisonings in Sri Lanka: a study protocol
title Cost-effectiveness analyses of self-harm strategies aimed at reducing the mortality of pesticide self-poisonings in Sri Lanka: a study protocol
title_full Cost-effectiveness analyses of self-harm strategies aimed at reducing the mortality of pesticide self-poisonings in Sri Lanka: a study protocol
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analyses of self-harm strategies aimed at reducing the mortality of pesticide self-poisonings in Sri Lanka: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analyses of self-harm strategies aimed at reducing the mortality of pesticide self-poisonings in Sri Lanka: a study protocol
title_short Cost-effectiveness analyses of self-harm strategies aimed at reducing the mortality of pesticide self-poisonings in Sri Lanka: a study protocol
title_sort cost-effectiveness analyses of self-harm strategies aimed at reducing the mortality of pesticide self-poisonings in sri lanka: a study protocol
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4346671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25724984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007333
work_keys_str_mv AT madsenlizellbustamante costeffectivenessanalysesofselfharmstrategiesaimedatreducingthemortalityofpesticideselfpoisoningsinsrilankaastudyprotocol
AT eddlestonmichael costeffectivenessanalysesofselfharmstrategiesaimedatreducingthemortalityofpesticideselfpoisoningsinsrilankaastudyprotocol
AT hansenkristianschultz costeffectivenessanalysesofselfharmstrategiesaimedatreducingthemortalityofpesticideselfpoisoningsinsrilankaastudyprotocol
AT pearsonmelissa costeffectivenessanalysesofselfharmstrategiesaimedatreducingthemortalityofpesticideselfpoisoningsinsrilankaastudyprotocol
AT agampodisuneth costeffectivenessanalysesofselfharmstrategiesaimedatreducingthemortalityofpesticideselfpoisoningsinsrilankaastudyprotocol
AT jayamanneshaluka costeffectivenessanalysesofselfharmstrategiesaimedatreducingthemortalityofpesticideselfpoisoningsinsrilankaastudyprotocol
AT konradsenflemming costeffectivenessanalysesofselfharmstrategiesaimedatreducingthemortalityofpesticideselfpoisoningsinsrilankaastudyprotocol