Cargando…

The pervasive role of biological cohesion in bedform development

Sediment fluxes in aquatic environments are crucially dependent on bedform dynamics. However, sediment-flux predictions rely almost completely on clean-sand studies, despite most environments being composed of mixtures of non-cohesive sands, physically cohesive muds and biologically cohesive extrace...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malarkey, Jonathan, Baas, Jaco H., Hope, Julie A., Aspden, Rebecca J., Parsons, Daniel R., Peakall, Jeff, Paterson, David M., Schindler, Robert J., Ye, Leiping, Lichtman, Ian D., Bass, Sarah J., Davies, Alan G., Manning, Andrew J., Thorne, Peter D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Pub. Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25656496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7257
_version_ 1782359799302717440
author Malarkey, Jonathan
Baas, Jaco H.
Hope, Julie A.
Aspden, Rebecca J.
Parsons, Daniel R.
Peakall, Jeff
Paterson, David M.
Schindler, Robert J.
Ye, Leiping
Lichtman, Ian D.
Bass, Sarah J.
Davies, Alan G.
Manning, Andrew J.
Thorne, Peter D.
author_facet Malarkey, Jonathan
Baas, Jaco H.
Hope, Julie A.
Aspden, Rebecca J.
Parsons, Daniel R.
Peakall, Jeff
Paterson, David M.
Schindler, Robert J.
Ye, Leiping
Lichtman, Ian D.
Bass, Sarah J.
Davies, Alan G.
Manning, Andrew J.
Thorne, Peter D.
author_sort Malarkey, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description Sediment fluxes in aquatic environments are crucially dependent on bedform dynamics. However, sediment-flux predictions rely almost completely on clean-sand studies, despite most environments being composed of mixtures of non-cohesive sands, physically cohesive muds and biologically cohesive extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) generated by microorganisms. EPS associated with surficial biofilms are known to stabilize sediment and increase erosion thresholds. Here we present experimental data showing that the pervasive distribution of low levels of EPS throughout the sediment, rather than the high surficial levels of EPS in biofilms, is the key control on bedform dynamics. The development time for bedforms increases by up to two orders of magnitude for extremely small quantities of pervasively distributed EPS. This effect is far stronger than for physical cohesion, because EPS inhibit sand grains from moving independently. The results highlight that present bedform predictors are overly simplistic, and the associated sediment transport processes require re-assessment for the influence of EPS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4347294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Pub. Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43472942015-03-10 The pervasive role of biological cohesion in bedform development Malarkey, Jonathan Baas, Jaco H. Hope, Julie A. Aspden, Rebecca J. Parsons, Daniel R. Peakall, Jeff Paterson, David M. Schindler, Robert J. Ye, Leiping Lichtman, Ian D. Bass, Sarah J. Davies, Alan G. Manning, Andrew J. Thorne, Peter D. Nat Commun Article Sediment fluxes in aquatic environments are crucially dependent on bedform dynamics. However, sediment-flux predictions rely almost completely on clean-sand studies, despite most environments being composed of mixtures of non-cohesive sands, physically cohesive muds and biologically cohesive extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) generated by microorganisms. EPS associated with surficial biofilms are known to stabilize sediment and increase erosion thresholds. Here we present experimental data showing that the pervasive distribution of low levels of EPS throughout the sediment, rather than the high surficial levels of EPS in biofilms, is the key control on bedform dynamics. The development time for bedforms increases by up to two orders of magnitude for extremely small quantities of pervasively distributed EPS. This effect is far stronger than for physical cohesion, because EPS inhibit sand grains from moving independently. The results highlight that present bedform predictors are overly simplistic, and the associated sediment transport processes require re-assessment for the influence of EPS. Nature Pub. Group 2015-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4347294/ /pubmed/25656496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7257 Text en Copyright © 2015, Nature Publishing Group, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. All Rights Reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Malarkey, Jonathan
Baas, Jaco H.
Hope, Julie A.
Aspden, Rebecca J.
Parsons, Daniel R.
Peakall, Jeff
Paterson, David M.
Schindler, Robert J.
Ye, Leiping
Lichtman, Ian D.
Bass, Sarah J.
Davies, Alan G.
Manning, Andrew J.
Thorne, Peter D.
The pervasive role of biological cohesion in bedform development
title The pervasive role of biological cohesion in bedform development
title_full The pervasive role of biological cohesion in bedform development
title_fullStr The pervasive role of biological cohesion in bedform development
title_full_unstemmed The pervasive role of biological cohesion in bedform development
title_short The pervasive role of biological cohesion in bedform development
title_sort pervasive role of biological cohesion in bedform development
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25656496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7257
work_keys_str_mv AT malarkeyjonathan thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT baasjacoh thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT hopejuliea thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT aspdenrebeccaj thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT parsonsdanielr thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT peakalljeff thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT patersondavidm thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT schindlerrobertj thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT yeleiping thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT lichtmaniand thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT basssarahj thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT daviesalang thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT manningandrewj thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT thornepeterd thepervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT malarkeyjonathan pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT baasjacoh pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT hopejuliea pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT aspdenrebeccaj pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT parsonsdanielr pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT peakalljeff pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT patersondavidm pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT schindlerrobertj pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT yeleiping pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT lichtmaniand pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT basssarahj pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT daviesalang pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT manningandrewj pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment
AT thornepeterd pervasiveroleofbiologicalcohesioninbedformdevelopment