Cargando…
Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy
INTRODUCTION: Although lip bumpers (LBs) provide significant clinical gain of mandibular arch perimeter in mixed-dentition patients, orthodontists are reluctant to use them due to the possibility of permanent second molar eruptive disturbances. OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to assess se...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.099-104.oar |
_version_ | 1782359810886336512 |
---|---|
author | Jacob, Helder Baldi LeMert, Shawn Alexander, Richard G. Buschang, Peter H. |
author_facet | Jacob, Helder Baldi LeMert, Shawn Alexander, Richard G. Buschang, Peter H. |
author_sort | Jacob, Helder Baldi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Although lip bumpers (LBs) provide significant clinical gain of mandibular arch perimeter in mixed-dentition patients, orthodontists are reluctant to use them due to the possibility of permanent second molar eruptive disturbances. OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to assess second molar impaction associated with the use of LBs, and to investigate how they can be solved. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral and panoramic radiographs of 67 patients (34 females and 33 males) were assessed prior (T(1)) and post-LB treatment (T(2)). LB therapy lasted for approximately 1.8 ± 0.9 years. Concomitant rapid palatal expansion (RPE) was performed in the maxilla at LB treatment onset. Impaction of mandibular second molars was assessed by means of panoramic radiographs in relation to the position of first mandibular molars. Horizontal and vertical movements of first and second molars were assessed cephalometrically on lateral cephalometric radiographs based on mandibular superimpositions. RESULTS: Eight (11.9%) patients had impacted second molars at the end of LB therapy. Two patients required surgical correction, whereas five required spacers and one patient was self-corrected. Mandibular first molar tip and apex migrated forward 1.3 mm and 2.3 mm, respectively. Second molar tip showed no statistically significant horizontal movement. CONCLUSION: Although LB therapy increased the risk of second molar impaction, impactions were, in most instances, easily solved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4347417 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43474172015-03-03 Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy Jacob, Helder Baldi LeMert, Shawn Alexander, Richard G. Buschang, Peter H. Dental Press J Orthod Articles INTRODUCTION: Although lip bumpers (LBs) provide significant clinical gain of mandibular arch perimeter in mixed-dentition patients, orthodontists are reluctant to use them due to the possibility of permanent second molar eruptive disturbances. OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to assess second molar impaction associated with the use of LBs, and to investigate how they can be solved. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral and panoramic radiographs of 67 patients (34 females and 33 males) were assessed prior (T(1)) and post-LB treatment (T(2)). LB therapy lasted for approximately 1.8 ± 0.9 years. Concomitant rapid palatal expansion (RPE) was performed in the maxilla at LB treatment onset. Impaction of mandibular second molars was assessed by means of panoramic radiographs in relation to the position of first mandibular molars. Horizontal and vertical movements of first and second molars were assessed cephalometrically on lateral cephalometric radiographs based on mandibular superimpositions. RESULTS: Eight (11.9%) patients had impacted second molars at the end of LB therapy. Two patients required surgical correction, whereas five required spacers and one patient was self-corrected. Mandibular first molar tip and apex migrated forward 1.3 mm and 2.3 mm, respectively. Second molar tip showed no statistically significant horizontal movement. CONCLUSION: Although LB therapy increased the risk of second molar impaction, impactions were, in most instances, easily solved. Dental Press International 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4347417/ /pubmed/25628086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.099-104.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Jacob, Helder Baldi LeMert, Shawn Alexander, Richard G. Buschang, Peter H. Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy |
title | Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy |
title_full | Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy |
title_fullStr | Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy |
title_short | Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy |
title_sort | second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347417/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.099-104.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacobhelderbaldi secondmolarimpactionassociatedwithlipbumpertherapy AT lemertshawn secondmolarimpactionassociatedwithlipbumpertherapy AT alexanderrichardg secondmolarimpactionassociatedwithlipbumpertherapy AT buschangpeterh secondmolarimpactionassociatedwithlipbumpertherapy |