Cargando…

Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy

INTRODUCTION: Although lip bumpers (LBs) provide significant clinical gain of mandibular arch perimeter in mixed-dentition patients, orthodontists are reluctant to use them due to the possibility of permanent second molar eruptive disturbances. OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to assess se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob, Helder Baldi, LeMert, Shawn, Alexander, Richard G., Buschang, Peter H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.099-104.oar
_version_ 1782359810886336512
author Jacob, Helder Baldi
LeMert, Shawn
Alexander, Richard G.
Buschang, Peter H.
author_facet Jacob, Helder Baldi
LeMert, Shawn
Alexander, Richard G.
Buschang, Peter H.
author_sort Jacob, Helder Baldi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Although lip bumpers (LBs) provide significant clinical gain of mandibular arch perimeter in mixed-dentition patients, orthodontists are reluctant to use them due to the possibility of permanent second molar eruptive disturbances. OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to assess second molar impaction associated with the use of LBs, and to investigate how they can be solved. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral and panoramic radiographs of 67 patients (34 females and 33 males) were assessed prior (T(1)) and post-LB treatment (T(2)). LB therapy lasted for approximately 1.8 ± 0.9 years. Concomitant rapid palatal expansion (RPE) was performed in the maxilla at LB treatment onset. Impaction of mandibular second molars was assessed by means of panoramic radiographs in relation to the position of first mandibular molars. Horizontal and vertical movements of first and second molars were assessed cephalometrically on lateral cephalometric radiographs based on mandibular superimpositions. RESULTS: Eight (11.9%) patients had impacted second molars at the end of LB therapy. Two patients required surgical correction, whereas five required spacers and one patient was self-corrected. Mandibular first molar tip and apex migrated forward 1.3 mm and 2.3 mm, respectively. Second molar tip showed no statistically significant horizontal movement. CONCLUSION: Although LB therapy increased the risk of second molar impaction, impactions were, in most instances, easily solved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4347417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43474172015-03-03 Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy Jacob, Helder Baldi LeMert, Shawn Alexander, Richard G. Buschang, Peter H. Dental Press J Orthod Articles INTRODUCTION: Although lip bumpers (LBs) provide significant clinical gain of mandibular arch perimeter in mixed-dentition patients, orthodontists are reluctant to use them due to the possibility of permanent second molar eruptive disturbances. OBJECTIVE: The present study was conducted to assess second molar impaction associated with the use of LBs, and to investigate how they can be solved. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral and panoramic radiographs of 67 patients (34 females and 33 males) were assessed prior (T(1)) and post-LB treatment (T(2)). LB therapy lasted for approximately 1.8 ± 0.9 years. Concomitant rapid palatal expansion (RPE) was performed in the maxilla at LB treatment onset. Impaction of mandibular second molars was assessed by means of panoramic radiographs in relation to the position of first mandibular molars. Horizontal and vertical movements of first and second molars were assessed cephalometrically on lateral cephalometric radiographs based on mandibular superimpositions. RESULTS: Eight (11.9%) patients had impacted second molars at the end of LB therapy. Two patients required surgical correction, whereas five required spacers and one patient was self-corrected. Mandibular first molar tip and apex migrated forward 1.3 mm and 2.3 mm, respectively. Second molar tip showed no statistically significant horizontal movement. CONCLUSION: Although LB therapy increased the risk of second molar impaction, impactions were, in most instances, easily solved. Dental Press International 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4347417/ /pubmed/25628086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.099-104.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Jacob, Helder Baldi
LeMert, Shawn
Alexander, Richard G.
Buschang, Peter H.
Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy
title Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy
title_full Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy
title_fullStr Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy
title_full_unstemmed Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy
title_short Second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy
title_sort second molar impaction associated with lip bumper therapy
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.099-104.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobhelderbaldi secondmolarimpactionassociatedwithlipbumpertherapy
AT lemertshawn secondmolarimpactionassociatedwithlipbumpertherapy
AT alexanderrichardg secondmolarimpactionassociatedwithlipbumpertherapy
AT buschangpeterh secondmolarimpactionassociatedwithlipbumpertherapy