Cargando…
Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding
INTRODUCTION: At orthodontic treatment completion, knowledge about the effects of adhesive remnant removal on enamel is paramount. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the effect of different adhesive remnant removal methods on enamel topography (ESI) and surface roughness (Ra) after bracket deb...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.105-112.oar |
_version_ | 1782359811114926080 |
---|---|
author | Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina Vedovello, Mario Correr, Américo Bortolazzo |
author_facet | Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina Vedovello, Mario Correr, Américo Bortolazzo |
author_sort | Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: At orthodontic treatment completion, knowledge about the effects of adhesive remnant removal on enamel is paramount. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the effect of different adhesive remnant removal methods on enamel topography (ESI) and surface roughness (Ra) after bracket debonding and polishing. METHODS: A total of 50 human premolars were selected and divided into five groups according to the method used for adhesive remnant removal: high speed tungsten carbide bur (TCB), Sof-Lex discs (SL), adhesive removing plier (PL), ultrasound (US) and Fiberglass burs (FB). Metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT, stored at 37(o)C for 24 hours before debonding with adhesive removing plier. Subsequently, removal methods were carried out followed by polishing with pumice paste. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted with pre-bonding, post-debonding and post-polishing analyses. Results were submitted to statistical analysis with F test (ANOVA) and Tukey's (Ra) as well as with Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests (ESI) (P < 0.05). RESULTS: US Ra and ESI were significantly greater than TCB, SL, PL and FB. Polishing minimized Ra and ESI in the SL and FB groups. CONCLUSION: Adhesive remnant removal with SL and FB associated with polishing are recommended due to causing little damage to the enamel. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4347418 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43474182015-03-03 Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina Vedovello, Mario Correr, Américo Bortolazzo Dental Press J Orthod Articles INTRODUCTION: At orthodontic treatment completion, knowledge about the effects of adhesive remnant removal on enamel is paramount. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the effect of different adhesive remnant removal methods on enamel topography (ESI) and surface roughness (Ra) after bracket debonding and polishing. METHODS: A total of 50 human premolars were selected and divided into five groups according to the method used for adhesive remnant removal: high speed tungsten carbide bur (TCB), Sof-Lex discs (SL), adhesive removing plier (PL), ultrasound (US) and Fiberglass burs (FB). Metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT, stored at 37(o)C for 24 hours before debonding with adhesive removing plier. Subsequently, removal methods were carried out followed by polishing with pumice paste. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted with pre-bonding, post-debonding and post-polishing analyses. Results were submitted to statistical analysis with F test (ANOVA) and Tukey's (Ra) as well as with Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests (ESI) (P < 0.05). RESULTS: US Ra and ESI were significantly greater than TCB, SL, PL and FB. Polishing minimized Ra and ESI in the SL and FB groups. CONCLUSION: Adhesive remnant removal with SL and FB associated with polishing are recommended due to causing little damage to the enamel. Dental Press International 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4347418/ /pubmed/25628087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.105-112.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina Vedovello, Mario Correr, Américo Bortolazzo Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding |
title | Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket
debonding |
title_full | Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket
debonding |
title_fullStr | Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket
debonding |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket
debonding |
title_short | Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket
debonding |
title_sort | effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket
debonding |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347418/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.105-112.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cardosolarissaadrianmeira effectofadhesiveremnantremovalonenameltopographyafterbracketdebonding AT valdrighiheloisacristina effectofadhesiveremnantremovalonenameltopographyafterbracketdebonding AT vedovellomario effectofadhesiveremnantremovalonenameltopographyafterbracketdebonding AT correramericobortolazzo effectofadhesiveremnantremovalonenameltopographyafterbracketdebonding |