Cargando…

Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding

INTRODUCTION: At orthodontic treatment completion, knowledge about the effects of adhesive remnant removal on enamel is paramount. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the effect of different adhesive remnant removal methods on enamel topography (ESI) and surface roughness (Ra) after bracket deb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira, Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina, Vedovello, Mario, Correr, Américo Bortolazzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.105-112.oar
_version_ 1782359811114926080
author Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira
Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina
Vedovello, Mario
Correr, Américo Bortolazzo
author_facet Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira
Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina
Vedovello, Mario
Correr, Américo Bortolazzo
author_sort Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: At orthodontic treatment completion, knowledge about the effects of adhesive remnant removal on enamel is paramount. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the effect of different adhesive remnant removal methods on enamel topography (ESI) and surface roughness (Ra) after bracket debonding and polishing. METHODS: A total of 50 human premolars were selected and divided into five groups according to the method used for adhesive remnant removal: high speed tungsten carbide bur (TCB), Sof-Lex discs (SL), adhesive removing plier (PL), ultrasound (US) and Fiberglass burs (FB). Metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT, stored at 37(o)C for 24 hours before debonding with adhesive removing plier. Subsequently, removal methods were carried out followed by polishing with pumice paste. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted with pre-bonding, post-debonding and post-polishing analyses. Results were submitted to statistical analysis with F test (ANOVA) and Tukey's (Ra) as well as with Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests (ESI) (P < 0.05). RESULTS: US Ra and ESI were significantly greater than TCB, SL, PL and FB. Polishing minimized Ra and ESI in the SL and FB groups. CONCLUSION: Adhesive remnant removal with SL and FB associated with polishing are recommended due to causing little damage to the enamel.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4347418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43474182015-03-03 Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina Vedovello, Mario Correr, Américo Bortolazzo Dental Press J Orthod Articles INTRODUCTION: At orthodontic treatment completion, knowledge about the effects of adhesive remnant removal on enamel is paramount. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at assessing the effect of different adhesive remnant removal methods on enamel topography (ESI) and surface roughness (Ra) after bracket debonding and polishing. METHODS: A total of 50 human premolars were selected and divided into five groups according to the method used for adhesive remnant removal: high speed tungsten carbide bur (TCB), Sof-Lex discs (SL), adhesive removing plier (PL), ultrasound (US) and Fiberglass burs (FB). Metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT, stored at 37(o)C for 24 hours before debonding with adhesive removing plier. Subsequently, removal methods were carried out followed by polishing with pumice paste. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted with pre-bonding, post-debonding and post-polishing analyses. Results were submitted to statistical analysis with F test (ANOVA) and Tukey's (Ra) as well as with Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests (ESI) (P < 0.05). RESULTS: US Ra and ESI were significantly greater than TCB, SL, PL and FB. Polishing minimized Ra and ESI in the SL and FB groups. CONCLUSION: Adhesive remnant removal with SL and FB associated with polishing are recommended due to causing little damage to the enamel. Dental Press International 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4347418/ /pubmed/25628087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.105-112.oar Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Cardoso, Larissa Adrian Meira
Valdrighi, Heloísa Cristina
Vedovello, Mario
Correr, Américo Bortolazzo
Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding
title Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding
title_full Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding
title_fullStr Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding
title_full_unstemmed Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding
title_short Effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding
title_sort effect of adhesive remnant removal on enamel topography after bracket debonding
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347418/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25628087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.105-112.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT cardosolarissaadrianmeira effectofadhesiveremnantremovalonenameltopographyafterbracketdebonding
AT valdrighiheloisacristina effectofadhesiveremnantremovalonenameltopographyafterbracketdebonding
AT vedovellomario effectofadhesiveremnantremovalonenameltopographyafterbracketdebonding
AT correramericobortolazzo effectofadhesiveremnantremovalonenameltopographyafterbracketdebonding