Cargando…
Segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on multi-atlas likelihood fusion: testing using data with a broad range of anatomical and photometric profiles
We propose a hierarchical pipeline for skull-stripping and segmentation of anatomical structures of interest from T1-weighted images of the human brain. The pipeline is constructed based on a two-level Bayesian parameter estimation algorithm called multi-atlas likelihood fusion (MALF). In MALF, esti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25784852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00061 |
_version_ | 1782359814864633856 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Xiaoying Crocetti, Deana Kutten, Kwame Ceritoglu, Can Albert, Marilyn S. Mori, Susumu Mostofsky, Stewart H. Miller, Michael I. |
author_facet | Tang, Xiaoying Crocetti, Deana Kutten, Kwame Ceritoglu, Can Albert, Marilyn S. Mori, Susumu Mostofsky, Stewart H. Miller, Michael I. |
author_sort | Tang, Xiaoying |
collection | PubMed |
description | We propose a hierarchical pipeline for skull-stripping and segmentation of anatomical structures of interest from T1-weighted images of the human brain. The pipeline is constructed based on a two-level Bayesian parameter estimation algorithm called multi-atlas likelihood fusion (MALF). In MALF, estimation of the parameter of interest is performed via maximum a posteriori estimation using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. The likelihoods of multiple atlases are fused in the E-step while the optimal estimator, a single maximizer of the fused likelihoods, is then obtained in the M-step. There are two stages in the proposed pipeline; first the input T1-weighted image is automatically skull-stripped via a fast MALF, then internal brain structures of interest are automatically extracted using a regular MALF. We assess the performance of each of the two modules in the pipeline based on two sets of images with markedly different anatomical and photometric contrasts; 3T MPRAGE scans of pediatric subjects with developmental disorders vs. 1.5T SPGR scans of elderly subjects with dementia. Evaluation is performed quantitatively using the Dice overlap as well as qualitatively via visual inspections. As a result, we demonstrate subject-level differences in the performance of the proposed pipeline, which may be accounted for by age, diagnosis, or the imaging parameters (particularly the field strength). For the subcortical and ventricular structures of the two datasets, the hierarchical pipeline is capable of producing automated segmentations with Dice overlaps ranging from 0.8 to 0.964 when compared with the gold standard. Comparisons with other representative segmentation algorithms are presented, relative to which the proposed hierarchical pipeline demonstrates comparative or superior accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4347448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-43474482015-03-17 Segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on multi-atlas likelihood fusion: testing using data with a broad range of anatomical and photometric profiles Tang, Xiaoying Crocetti, Deana Kutten, Kwame Ceritoglu, Can Albert, Marilyn S. Mori, Susumu Mostofsky, Stewart H. Miller, Michael I. Front Neurosci Neuroscience We propose a hierarchical pipeline for skull-stripping and segmentation of anatomical structures of interest from T1-weighted images of the human brain. The pipeline is constructed based on a two-level Bayesian parameter estimation algorithm called multi-atlas likelihood fusion (MALF). In MALF, estimation of the parameter of interest is performed via maximum a posteriori estimation using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. The likelihoods of multiple atlases are fused in the E-step while the optimal estimator, a single maximizer of the fused likelihoods, is then obtained in the M-step. There are two stages in the proposed pipeline; first the input T1-weighted image is automatically skull-stripped via a fast MALF, then internal brain structures of interest are automatically extracted using a regular MALF. We assess the performance of each of the two modules in the pipeline based on two sets of images with markedly different anatomical and photometric contrasts; 3T MPRAGE scans of pediatric subjects with developmental disorders vs. 1.5T SPGR scans of elderly subjects with dementia. Evaluation is performed quantitatively using the Dice overlap as well as qualitatively via visual inspections. As a result, we demonstrate subject-level differences in the performance of the proposed pipeline, which may be accounted for by age, diagnosis, or the imaging parameters (particularly the field strength). For the subcortical and ventricular structures of the two datasets, the hierarchical pipeline is capable of producing automated segmentations with Dice overlaps ranging from 0.8 to 0.964 when compared with the gold standard. Comparisons with other representative segmentation algorithms are presented, relative to which the proposed hierarchical pipeline demonstrates comparative or superior accuracy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4347448/ /pubmed/25784852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00061 Text en Copyright © 2015 Tang, Crocetti, Kutten, Ceritoglu, Albert, Mori, Mostofsky and Miller. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Tang, Xiaoying Crocetti, Deana Kutten, Kwame Ceritoglu, Can Albert, Marilyn S. Mori, Susumu Mostofsky, Stewart H. Miller, Michael I. Segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on multi-atlas likelihood fusion: testing using data with a broad range of anatomical and photometric profiles |
title | Segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on multi-atlas likelihood fusion: testing using data with a broad range of anatomical and photometric profiles |
title_full | Segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on multi-atlas likelihood fusion: testing using data with a broad range of anatomical and photometric profiles |
title_fullStr | Segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on multi-atlas likelihood fusion: testing using data with a broad range of anatomical and photometric profiles |
title_full_unstemmed | Segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on multi-atlas likelihood fusion: testing using data with a broad range of anatomical and photometric profiles |
title_short | Segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on multi-atlas likelihood fusion: testing using data with a broad range of anatomical and photometric profiles |
title_sort | segmentation of brain magnetic resonance images based on multi-atlas likelihood fusion: testing using data with a broad range of anatomical and photometric profiles |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25784852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangxiaoying segmentationofbrainmagneticresonanceimagesbasedonmultiatlaslikelihoodfusiontestingusingdatawithabroadrangeofanatomicalandphotometricprofiles AT crocettideana segmentationofbrainmagneticresonanceimagesbasedonmultiatlaslikelihoodfusiontestingusingdatawithabroadrangeofanatomicalandphotometricprofiles AT kuttenkwame segmentationofbrainmagneticresonanceimagesbasedonmultiatlaslikelihoodfusiontestingusingdatawithabroadrangeofanatomicalandphotometricprofiles AT ceritoglucan segmentationofbrainmagneticresonanceimagesbasedonmultiatlaslikelihoodfusiontestingusingdatawithabroadrangeofanatomicalandphotometricprofiles AT albertmarilyns segmentationofbrainmagneticresonanceimagesbasedonmultiatlaslikelihoodfusiontestingusingdatawithabroadrangeofanatomicalandphotometricprofiles AT morisusumu segmentationofbrainmagneticresonanceimagesbasedonmultiatlaslikelihoodfusiontestingusingdatawithabroadrangeofanatomicalandphotometricprofiles AT mostofskystewarth segmentationofbrainmagneticresonanceimagesbasedonmultiatlaslikelihoodfusiontestingusingdatawithabroadrangeofanatomicalandphotometricprofiles AT millermichaeli segmentationofbrainmagneticresonanceimagesbasedonmultiatlaslikelihoodfusiontestingusingdatawithabroadrangeofanatomicalandphotometricprofiles |