Cargando…

Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis

BACKGROUND: For diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis, the most accurate parameter among the conventional echocardiographic parameters remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic efficacy of conventional echocardiographic parameters in the diagnosis of significant coronary arte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Xiao Zhi, Yang, Bin, Wu, Jing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785175
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.11405
_version_ 1782359860974714880
author Zheng, Xiao Zhi
Yang, Bin
Wu, Jing
author_facet Zheng, Xiao Zhi
Yang, Bin
Wu, Jing
author_sort Zheng, Xiao Zhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis, the most accurate parameter among the conventional echocardiographic parameters remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic efficacy of conventional echocardiographic parameters in the diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis and their correlation with the percentage of stenosis considering conventional coronary angiography as gold standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy eight individuals were included in the study. The three echocardiographic parameters including the coronary sinus flow [flow (mL/minute)], the global left ventricular perfusion by dividing the coronary sinus flow by left ventricular mass [flow/LVM (mL/minute)] and the difference between the left ventricular mass at end diastole and peak systole using area-length calculation methods [LV (d-s) mass A-L] were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for their accuracy to distinguish between normal subjects and patients with significant (> 50%) coronary artery disease (CAD). RESULTS: Flow (mL/minute), flow/LVM (mL/minuteg) and LV (d-s) mass A-L all correlated significantly with the percentage of stenosis (r = -0.64, P < 0.001; r = -0.47, P < 0.001; r = -0.56, P < 0.001, respectively). With the use of the percentage of stenosis > 50% as the criteria to distinguish patients with or without CAD, the areas under the ROC curve for flow (mL/minute) were 0.75, while they were 0.57 for flow/LVM (mL/minuteg) and 0.59 for LV (d-s) mass A-L. The percentage of stenosis > 70% was best detected by coronary sinus flow < 198 mL/minute (sensitivity, 81.35%; specificity, 70.37%; positive predictive value, 63.63%; negative predictive value, 86.36% and accuracy, 75%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The coronary sinus flow per minute is the most accurate parameter among the three echocardiographic parameters mentioned above for the assessment of significant stenosis of the coronary artery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4347731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-43477312015-03-17 Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis Zheng, Xiao Zhi Yang, Bin Wu, Jing Iran J Radiol Cardiac Imaging BACKGROUND: For diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis, the most accurate parameter among the conventional echocardiographic parameters remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic efficacy of conventional echocardiographic parameters in the diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis and their correlation with the percentage of stenosis considering conventional coronary angiography as gold standard. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy eight individuals were included in the study. The three echocardiographic parameters including the coronary sinus flow [flow (mL/minute)], the global left ventricular perfusion by dividing the coronary sinus flow by left ventricular mass [flow/LVM (mL/minute)] and the difference between the left ventricular mass at end diastole and peak systole using area-length calculation methods [LV (d-s) mass A-L] were assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for their accuracy to distinguish between normal subjects and patients with significant (> 50%) coronary artery disease (CAD). RESULTS: Flow (mL/minute), flow/LVM (mL/minuteg) and LV (d-s) mass A-L all correlated significantly with the percentage of stenosis (r = -0.64, P < 0.001; r = -0.47, P < 0.001; r = -0.56, P < 0.001, respectively). With the use of the percentage of stenosis > 50% as the criteria to distinguish patients with or without CAD, the areas under the ROC curve for flow (mL/minute) were 0.75, while they were 0.57 for flow/LVM (mL/minuteg) and 0.59 for LV (d-s) mass A-L. The percentage of stenosis > 70% was best detected by coronary sinus flow < 198 mL/minute (sensitivity, 81.35%; specificity, 70.37%; positive predictive value, 63.63%; negative predictive value, 86.36% and accuracy, 75%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The coronary sinus flow per minute is the most accurate parameter among the three echocardiographic parameters mentioned above for the assessment of significant stenosis of the coronary artery. Kowsar 2015-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4347731/ /pubmed/25785175 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.11405 Text en Copyright © 2015, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cardiac Imaging
Zheng, Xiao Zhi
Yang, Bin
Wu, Jing
Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis
title Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis
title_full Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis
title_fullStr Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis
title_short Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Significant Coronary Artery Stenosis
title_sort comparison of the efficacy of conventional echocardiographic parameters in the diagnosis of significant coronary artery stenosis
topic Cardiac Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4347731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25785175
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.11405
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengxiaozhi comparisonoftheefficacyofconventionalechocardiographicparametersinthediagnosisofsignificantcoronaryarterystenosis
AT yangbin comparisonoftheefficacyofconventionalechocardiographicparametersinthediagnosisofsignificantcoronaryarterystenosis
AT wujing comparisonoftheefficacyofconventionalechocardiographicparametersinthediagnosisofsignificantcoronaryarterystenosis